SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Sixty percent of the young children in the state have a home language other than English. The state currently enrolls 1,100,000 pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, who are English learners. For these pupils, academic gaps persist, many never achieve English proficiency, and academic outcomes remain unacceptably low.
(b) In 2017, the State Board of Education unanimously adopted a new, comprehensive, assets-oriented, and research-based California English Learner Roadmap State Board of Education Policy: Educational Programs and Services for English Learners (EL Roadmap Policy), which superseded the
1998 English Learner policy that was based upon Proposition 227.
(c) The EL Roadmap Policy explicitly focuses on English learner pupils in the context of the state’s efforts to improve the educational system, the quality of teaching and learning, and educational outcomes.
(d) The EL Roadmap Policy centers on standards, curriculum frameworks, assessment, accountability and school improvement, educator quality, early childhood and preschool, social and family support services, and parent and community involvement.
(e) As a comprehensive, aspirational, assets-based, and principles-based policy, the EL Roadmap Policy differs significantly from previous English learner policies as it requires the involvement of multiple roles, departments, and functions within school systems as well as alignment across initiatives and
levels of the system.
(f) The intent is that the vision and principles of the EL Roadmap Policy provide a framework for alignment and coherence, capacity building, and continuous improvement across these areas.
(g) Though the EL Roadmap Policy is the state’s official policy and is research based, aspirational, comprehensive, and has been adopted by the State Board of Education, the road to fulfilling its promise has not yet been adequately scoped nor supported.
(h) Recent findings from the first years of EL Roadmap Policy implementation have documented a lack of alignment and coherence at the state, regional, and local levels. Local educational agencies have been required to develop multiple plans linked to education initiatives without any reference to the EL Roadmap Policy. For multiple years, local control and
accountability plans have repeatedly been found to inadequately address the needs and assets of English learners and have not leveraged the research-based principles of the EL Roadmap Policy.
(i) Since the state’s adoption of the EL Roadmap Policy in 2017, the state has periodically supported implementation with modest investments such as capacity-building grants through the Educator Workforce Investment Grant program, grants to support dual language educational programming, and efforts to grow the state’s bilingual teacher workforce. However, these investments have been too piecemeal and small to convert the EL Roadmap Policy from a vision and guidance document into a compelling means of systemic change to drive the state’s public schools to better meet the needs of the state’s 1,100,000 English learner pupils instead of merely proposing that they do so.
(j) The state has
articulated an equitable, comprehensive, multilingual, and multicultural public education vision for English learner pupils, but it needs to provide sufficient leadership, planning, resources, and accountability to make that vision a reality in public schools.