SEC. 2.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(1) It is the intent of the Legislature in adopting this act to ensure that native species of California mammals are not commercially exploited for their fur.
(2) Historically, fur trapping played a significant role in the extirpation of wolves and wolverines and the severe declines in sea otters, fishers, marten, beaver, and other fur-bearing species in California. Because individual trappers concentrate their operations in limited geographical areas, they can locally deplete populations of the species they
target, impairing the ecological functioning of the area and diminishing opportunities for wildlife watching in these areas.
(3) Under existing law, both fur trappers and pest-control operators are required to procure a trapping license to lawfully trap certain fur-bearing and nongame mammals. Holders of a fur dealer license may also lawfully trap certain fur-bearing and nongame mammals.
(4) Under existing law, the raw furs of certain fur-bearing and nongame mammals may be sold by the holder of a trapping license or fur dealer license.
(5) Under existing law, the raw furs of any fur-bearing and nongame mammal taken by a pest-control operation or otherwise for depredation purposes pursuant to Sections 4152 and 4180
of the Fish and Game Code may not be sold.
(6) Nothing in this act is intended to alter existing law related to the hunting of fur-bearing and nongame mammals or to provisions of the Fish and Game Code related to the taking of fur-bearing and nongame mammals found injuring crops or property pursuant to Sections 4152 and 4180 of the Fish and Game Code.
(7) Subdivision (c) of Section 4006 of the Fish and Game Code requires that the cost of a trapping license must be adjusted by the Fish and Game Commission to fully recover the administrative and implementation costs of the Department of Fish and Wildlife and commission related to the licenses.
(8) In 2017, a total of 133 trapping licenses were sold in California
for purposes of recreation and commerce in fur. A total of four fur dealer licenses were also sold. The total revenue received by the Department of Fish and Wildlife for the sale of these trapping licenses was $15,544 and for the sale of the fur dealer licenses was $709.
(9) In 2017, a total of 68 trappers reported killing a total of 1,568 animals in California. Among the 10 species reported killed were grey fox, coyote, beaver, badger, and mink. Of the 1,568 animals killed, 1,241 were reported
sold. Based on average pelt prices, the total income generated by all the pelts trappers reported sold is likely less than $9,000.
(10) The revenue generated by the sale of trapping licenses would only cover a fraction of the costs of even a single warden. Proper management and enforcement of a fur trapping program would cost far more than the revenue generated by the Department of Fish and Wildlife, resulting in a de facto subsidy of commercial fur trapping. Similarly, the minimal revenue generated by the sale of the furs of the animals killed by trappers is dwarfed by the
millions of dollars that nonconsumptive wildlife watching generates in California’s economy.
(11) Prohibiting fur trapping would eliminate the needless taxpayer subsidized killing of California’s native species for the international fur trade, while better protecting the role these species place in our ecosystems and economy.
(b) In light of these findings and declarations, it is the intent of the Legislature to prohibit commercial and recreational trapping of all fur-bearing and nongame mammals in California.