Compare Versions


Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | print page

AB-3100 Workers’ compensation: Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: meningitis.(2017-2018)



Current Version: 03/22/18 - Amended Assembly

Compare Versions information image


AB3100:v98#DOCUMENT

Amended  IN  Assembly  March 22, 2018

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 3100

Introduced by Assembly Member Flora

February 16, 2018

An act to amend Section 3600.1 repeal and add Section 3212.9 of the Labor Code, relating to workers’ compensation.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 3100, as amended, Flora. Workers’ compensation: firefighters: off-duty fire suppression. Department of Forestry and Fire Protection: meningitis.
Existing law establishes a workers’ compensation system to compensate an employee for injuries arising out of, and in the course of, his or her employment. Existing law designates illnesses and conditions, including meningitis, that constitute a compensable injury for various employees, such as members of the Department of the California Highway Patrol, firefighters, and certain peace officers.
This bill would expand the coverage of the workers’ compensation provisions relating to meningitis to include an active firefighting member of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection. The bill would also make technical and clarifying organizational changes.

Existing law establishes a workers’ compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, to compensate an employee for injuries sustained in the course of his or her employment. Existing law requires, when a firefighter is injured, dies, or disabled from performing his or her duties as a firefighter by reason of his or her proceeding to or engaging in a fire-suppression or rescue operation, or the protection or preservation of life or property, anywhere in this state, but is not at the time acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer, the firefighter or his or her dependents to be accorded by his or her employer all of the same workers’ compensation benefits that he, she, or they would have received had that firefighter been acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer, as specified.

This bill would make technical, nonsubstantive changes to that provision.

Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: NOYES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 3212.9 of the Labor Code is repealed.
3212.9.

In the case of a member of a police department of a city, county, or city and county, or a member of the sheriff’s office of a county, or a member of the California Highway Patrol, or a county probation officer, or an inspector or investigator in a district attorney’s office of any county whose principal duties consist of active law enforcement service, when that person is employed on a regular, full-time salary, or in the case of a member of a fire department of any city, county, or district, or other public or municipal corporation or political subdivision, or any county forestry or firefighting department or unit, when those members are employed on a regular full-time salary, excepting those whose principal duties are clerical or otherwise do not clearly fall within the scope of active law enforcement or firefighting, such as stenographers, telephone operators, and other officeworkers, the term “injury” includes meningitis that develops or manifests itself during a period while that person is in the service of that department, office, or unit. The compensation that is awarded for the meningitis shall include full hospital, surgical, medical treatment, disability indemnity, and death benefits as provided by the provisions of this division.

The meningitis so developing or manifesting itself shall be presumed to arise out of and in the course of the employment. This presumption is disputable and may be controverted by other evidence, but unless so controverted, the appeals board is bound to find in accordance with it. This presumption shall be extended to a person following termination of service for a period of three calendar months for each full year of the requisite service, but not to exceed 60 months in any circumstance, commencing with the last date actually worked in the specified capacity.

SEC. 2.

 Section 3212.9 is added to the Labor Code, to read:

3212.9.
 (a) The term “injury” includes meningitis that develops or manifests itself when one of the following persons is in the service of the agency, department, or unit as described in this subdivision, and the compensation that is awarded for meningitis shall include full hospital, surgical, medical treatment, disability indemnity, and death benefits as provided by this division:
(1) A member of a police department of a city, county, or city and county, or a member of the sheriff’s office of a county, or a member of the Department of the California Highway Patrol.
(2) A county probation officer, or an inspector or investigator in a district attorney’s office of a county whose principal duties consist of active law enforcement service and who is employed on a regular, full-time salary.
(3) (A) A member of a fire department of any city, county, or district, or other public or municipal corporation or political subdivision, or a county forestry or firefighting department or unit, who is employed on a regular, full-time salary.
(B) An active firefighting member of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection.
(b) For purposes of this section, meningitis shall be presumed to arise out of, and in the course of, the employment. This presumption is disputable and may be controverted by other evidence, but unless so controverted, the appeals board is bound to find in accordance with it. This presumption shall be extended to a person following termination of service for a period of three calendar months for each full year of the requisite service, but not to exceed 60 months in any circumstance, commencing with the last date actually worked in the specified capacity.
(c) This section does not apply to persons whose principal duties are clerical or otherwise do not clearly fall within the scope of active law enforcement, including custody and corrections, or firefighting, such as stenographers, receptionists, and other office workers.

SECTION 1.Section 3600.1 of the Labor Code is amended to read:
3600.1.

(a)Whenever any firefighter of the state, as defined in Section 19886 of the Government Code, is injured, dies, or is disabled from performing his or her duties as a firefighter by reason of his or her proceeding to or engaging in a fire-suppression or rescue operation, or the protection or preservation of life or property, anywhere in this state, including the jurisdiction in which he or she is employed, but is not at the time acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer, he, she, or his or her dependents, as the case may be, shall be accorded by his or her employer all of the same benefits of this division that he, she, or they would have received had that firefighter been acting under the immediate direction of his or her employer. An injury, disability, or death that occurs under the circumstances described in this section shall be deemed to have arisen out of, and been sustained in, the course of employment for purposes of workers’ compensation and all other benefits.

(b)This section does not do either of the following:

(1)Require the extension of any benefits to a firefighter who, at the time of his or her injury, death, or disability, is acting for compensation from one other than the state.

(2)Require the extension of any benefits to a firefighter employed by the state if, by departmental regulation, whether now in force or hereafter enacted or promulgated, the activity giving rise to the injury, disability, or death is expressly prohibited.

(c)If the provisions of this section are in conflict with the provisions of a memorandum of understanding reached pursuant to Section 3517.5 of the Government Code, the memorandum of understanding shall be controlling without further legislative action, except that if the provisions of a memorandum of understanding require the expenditure of funds, the provisions are not effective unless approved by the Legislature in the annual Budget Act.