Compare Versions


Add To My Favorites | print page

SB-352 Workers’ compensation: medical treatment utilization schedule.(2007-2008)



Current Version: 02/20/07 - Introduced

Compare Versions information image


SB352:v99#DOCUMENT


CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2007–2008 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill
No. 352


Introduced  by  Senator Padilla

February 20, 2007


An act to amend Section 4604.5 of the Labor Code, relating to workers’ compensation.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 352, as introduced, Padilla. Workers’ compensation: medical treatment utilization schedule.
Existing workers’ compensation law requires employers to secure the payment of workers’ compensation, including medical treatment, for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, or in the course of, employment. Existing law requires the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation to adopt a medical treatment utilization schedule, containing specified guidelines covering the extent and scope of medical treatment to be provided to an injured employee. Existing law specifies that, notwithstanding the medical treatment utilization schedule or other specified medical practice guidelines, for injuries occurring on and after January 1, 2004, an employee is entitled to no more than 24 chiropractic, 24 occupational therapy, and 24 physical therapy visits per industrial injury, except when an employer authorizes, in writing, additional visits to a health care practitioner for physical medicine services.
This bill would exempt from the above-described limits on chiropractic, occupational therapy, and physical therapy visits specified employees of a sheriff’s office or police or fire department, peace officers, and active firefighters.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 4604.5 of the Labor Code is amended to read:

4604.5.
 (a) Upon adoption by the administrative director of a medical treatment utilization schedule pursuant to Section 5307.27, the recommended guidelines set forth in the schedule shall be presumptively correct on the issue of extent and scope of medical treatment. The presumption is rebuttable and may be controverted by a preponderance of the scientific medical evidence establishing that a variance from the guidelines is reasonably required to cure or relieve the injured worker from the effects of his or her injury. The presumption created is one affecting the burden of proof.
(b) The recommended guidelines set forth in the schedule adopted pursuant to subdivision (a) shall reflect practices that are evidence and scientifically based, nationally recognized, and peer-reviewed. The guidelines shall be designed to assist providers by offering an analytical framework for the evaluation and treatment of injured workers, and shall constitute care in accordance with Section 4600 for all injured workers diagnosed with industrial conditions.
(c) Three months after the publication date of the updated American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, and continuing until the effective date of a medical treatment utilization schedule, pursuant to Section 5307.27, the recommended guidelines set forth in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines shall be presumptively correct on the issue of extent and scope of medical treatment, regardless of date of injury. The presumption is rebuttable and may be controverted by a preponderance of the evidence establishing that a variance from the guidelines is reasonably required to cure and relieve the employee from the effects of his or her injury, in accordance with Section 4600. The presumption created is one affecting the burden of proof.
(d) (1) Notwithstanding the medical treatment utilization schedule or the guidelines set forth in the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines, for injuries occurring on and after January 1, 2004, an employee shall be entitled to no more than 24 chiropractic, 24 occupational therapy, and 24 physical therapy visits per industrial injury.
(2) This subdivision shall not apply when an employer authorizes, in writing, additional visits to a health care practitioner for physical medicine services. This subdivision shall also not apply to an injured worker who is an employee of a sheriff’s office, of a police or fire department of a city, county, city and county, district, or other public or municipal corporations or political subdivisions, is an individual described in Chapter 4.5 (commencing with Section 830) of Title 3 of Part 2 of the Penal Code, regardless of volunteer, partly paid, or paid status, or is an active firefighting member of the Department of Forestry and Fire Protection, or of any county forestry or firefighting department or unit, regardless of volunteer, partly paid, or paid status, unless the injured worker’s principal duties are clerical or otherwise do not clearly fall within the scope of active law enforcement service or active firefighting service, such as stenographers, telephone operators, and other office workers.
(e) For all injuries not covered by the American College of Occupational and Environmental Medicine’s Occupational Medicine Practice Guidelines or official utilization schedule after adoption pursuant to Section 5307.27, authorized treatment shall be in accordance with other evidence based medical treatment guidelines generally recognized by the national medical community and that are scientifically based.