Existing law requires all state and local agencies with an aggregate spending of $50,000,000 or more annually to consider establishing an ongoing audit function.
This bill would require all state agencies with an aggregate spending of $50,000,000 or more annually to establish an ongoing audit function.
Existing law requires any governing body, as defined, that oversees a state agency that performs or reviews internal audits to establish an audit committee. Existing law, the Bagley-Keene Open Meeting Act (Bagley-Keene Act), requires that all meetings of a state body, as defined, be open and public, and all persons be permitted to attend any meeting of a state body, except as provided. Violation of the Bagley-Keene Act is a crime.
This bill would extend the
requirements of the Bagley-Keene Act to the internal audit committees established by any governing body if the governing body is subject to the Bagley-Keene Act. By expanding the scope of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law generally requires all internal auditor operations of state agencies to meet specified criteria. If a state agency does not report to a governing body, existing law requires the internal auditor operations to, among other things, report audit findings and recommendations to the head or deputy head of the state agency and to the general counsel of the state agency, if applicable. If a state agency is overseen by a governing body, existing law requires the internal audit operations to, among other things, report audit findings and recommendations to the audit committee and general counsel of the governing body.
This bill would require both of these types
of state agencies to post audit findings and recommendations on its internet website within 5 days of reporting its audit findings and recommendations, as described above.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.