(1) Existing law establishes the Department of Consumer Affairs, specifies the various boards that comprise the department, and requires the boards to meet at least 3 times a year.
This bill would instead require the boards to meet at least 2 times a year.
(2) Existing law requires the Director of Consumer Affairs to implement complaint prioritization guidelines for boards to use in prioritizing their respective complaint and investigative workloads.
This bill would require the director to amend those guidelines to include the category of “allegations of serious harm to a minor,” as specified.
(3) Existing law, the Medical Practice Act, establishes the
Medical Board of California for the licensure and regulation of physicians and surgeons. Existing law prohibits a postgraduate trainee, intern, resident, postdoctoral fellow, or instructor from engaging in the practice of medicine unless he or she holds a valid, unrevoked, and unsuspended physician’s and surgeon’s certificate issued by the board. Existing law provides an exemption to this provision and authorizes a graduate of an approved medical school to engage in the practice of medicine as a part of a postgraduate training program, as specified. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2020, limits to 12 months the practice of medicine, and receipt of compensation for that practice, by a medical school graduate as a part of an approved first-year postgraduate training program. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2020, limits to 27 months the practice of medicine, and receipt of compensation for that practice, by a medical school graduate as a part of an approved residency or fellowship. Existing law, on
and after January 1, 2020, requires all privileges and exemptions under these provisions to cease automatically if the resident or fellow fails to receive a license to practice medicine within 27 months from the commencement of the residency or fellowship or if the board denies his or her application for licensure. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2020, requires all approved postgraduate training that the medical school graduate has successfully completed in the United States or Canada to count toward the aggregate 39-month license exemption. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2020, requires a medical school graduate to successfully complete a minimum of 36 months of approved postgraduate training with at least 24 consecutive months in the same program to be eligible for a California physician’s and surgeon’s certificate.
This bill would, on and after January 1, 2020, delete the 12-month and 27-month limitations on the license exemptions for medical school
graduates in first-year postgraduate training programs and residencies and fellowships, respectively. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2020, authorize the board, upon review of supporting documentation, to grant an extension beyond the 39-month license exemption to a postgraduate training licensee to successfully complete the 36 months of required approved postgraduate training. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2020, require an applicant who has successfully completed 36 months of approved postgraduate training in another state or in Canada and who is accepted into an approved postgraduate training program in California to obtain his or her license within 90 days after beginning the program. The bill would, on and after January 1, 2020, replace the requirement that the 24 months in the postgraduate training program be consecutive with a requirement that there be successful progression through the 24 months.
The bill would, on and after January 1, 2020,
require the program director for a postgraduate training program in California to report to the board, on a form approved by the board, and provide any supporting documents as required by the board, specified events regarding a postgraduate trainee’s status in the postgraduate program within 30 days of the event.
Existing law requires the board to issue a physician’s and surgeon’s certificate to an applicant who holds a specified license from another state or a Canadian province or Canadian provinces and who, in addition to meeting other requirements, has satisfactorily completed at least 2 years of approved postgraduate training or has satisfactorily completed at least one year of approved postgraduate training and takes and passes the clinical competency written examination. Existing law, on and after January 1, 2020, revises this provision to, among other things, exclude the applicant from licensure.
This bill instead
would continue to include such an applicant who meets the other requirements as revised on and after January 1, 2020.
Existing law authorizes a person who voluntarily cancels his or her license or fails to renew his or her license within 5 years after its expiration under the Medical Practice Act to apply for and obtain a new license upon satisfaction of specified requirements, including satisfactory completing 2 years of approved postgraduate training.
This bill would instead require the person to satisfactorily complete 3 years of approved postgraduate training.
Existing law establishes various fees in connection with the issuance of licenses under the Medical Practice Act, and requires those fees to be paid into the State Treasury and credited to the Contingent Fund of the Medical Board of California, available to the board for specified purposes upon appropriation by the
Legislature. Existing law requires that an applicant for a physician’s and surgeon’s postgraduate training license be required to pay only 50% of the initial license fee. Existing law requires the applicant to, among other things, pay the reduced licensing fee to be considered for a postgraduate training license.
This bill would instead require the applicant to pay a nonrefundable application and processing fee.
(4) Existing law regulates the practice of podiatric medicine by the California Board of Podiatric Medicine and prescribes various fees relating to, among others, an application, licensure, and renewal. All revenue received by the board is required to be deposited into the Board of Podiatric Medicine Fund, which is available to the board upon appropriation by the Legislature.
This bill would revise those fee provisions by, among other things, deleting
the oral examination fee and increasing, until January 1, 2021, the amount of the biennial renewal fee.
(5) Existing law, the Nursing Practice Act, regulates the practice of nursing by the Board of Registered Nursing and authorizes the board to appoint an executive officer.
This bill would authorize the executive officer to adopt a decision entered by default and a stipulation for surrender of a license.
Existing law establishes various fees in connection with the issuance of licenses under the act, and requires those fees to be deposited in the Board of Registered Nursing Fund, available to the board upon appropriation by the Legislature. Existing law establishes that the fee paid by a registered nurse for an evaluation of his or her qualifications to use the title “public health nurse” shall be not less than $500 or more than $1,500.
This bill would instead establish a fee for that purpose of not less than $300 or more than $1,000, would establish a penalty for failure to renew a certificate to practice as a public health nurse within the prescribed time, and would require the Board of Registered Nursing to reimburse any registered nurse who paid more than $300 for an evaluation between April 5, 2018, and December 31, 2018.
(6) Existing law, the Vocational Nursing Practice Act, provides for the regulation of vocational nurses by the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California, establishes the Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technician Fund, and makes those funds available to the board upon appropriation by the Legislature. Existing law prescribes various fees in connection with the issuance of licenses under the act and requires the board to collect a biennial fee not to exceed $200 from a
continuing education course provider.
This bill would instead require the board to collect an initial approval and a biennial renewal fee of $150 unless a higher fee, not to exceed $250, is established by the board. The bill would also require the board to collect an initial approval and a biennial renewal fee of $150, unless a higher fee, not to exceed $250, is established by the board, from any provider of a course in intravenous therapy, blood withdrawal, or intravenous therapy with blood withdrawal. The bill would revise the fees and fee amounts to be assessed under the act, including, but not limited to, application, examination, and renewal fees.
(7) Existing law, the Optometry Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of the practice of optometry by the State Board of Optometry. Existing law authorizes a person to renew an expired optometrist license by paying specified fees and
filing a form prescribed by the board. Existing law, commencing July 1, 2018, requires the board to charge an applicant for licensure a fee of $2, and an applicant for renewal a fee of $4, for purposes of developing an interface with the National Practitioner Data Bank.
This bill would also authorize the renewal of expired statements of licensure, branch office licenses, and fictitious name permits by filing an application for renewal and paying renewal and delinquency fees prescribed by the board, and would make the National Practitioner Data Bank fee $4 for both licensure and renewal applicants.
(8) Existing law, the Naturopathic Doctors Act, provides for the regulation of the practice of naturopathic medicine by the Naturopathic Medicine Committee within the Osteopathic Medical Board of California. Existing law establishes various fees in connection with the issuance of a license to practice
naturopathic medicine, which are deposited in the Naturopathic Doctor’s Fund and are available to the committee upon appropriation by the Legislature.
This bill would revise those provisions by, among other things, increasing the application, initial licensing, and renewal fees, and establishing a fee for a certified license verification.
(9) Existing law makes it unprofessional conduct for certain unlicensed persons who have completed clinical training in psychoanalysis and are registered to engage in psychoanalysis to use controlled substances, dangerous drugs, or alcoholic beverages under prescribed circumstances, including if the use impairs the ability of the registrant to practice safely. Existing law requires an unlicensed person registered to engage in psychoanalysis pursuant to those provisions to pay a sum not in excess of $100 and a renewal fee not in excess of $50 to the Contingent Fund of
the Medical Board of California. Existing law requires the board to revoke the exemption from licensure of any person who has been required to register as a sex offender, as specified. Existing law makes all of the these provisions inoperative on and after January 1, 2019.
This bill would delete the repeal of the above-specified provisions. By extending the term for an existing appropriation, the bill would make an appropriation.
(10) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of psychiatric technicians by the Board of Vocational Nursing and Psychiatric Technicians of the State of California, and authorizes the board, if it adopts a continuing education program, to collect a fee from continuing education course providers. Existing law also prescribes various fees in connection with the issuance of a psychiatric technician license.
This bill would
instead require the board, if it adopts a continuing education or blood withdrawal program, to collect an initial approval and a biennial renewal fee from a provider of a course in continuing education or blood withdrawal, as specified. The bill would also revise the fees and fee amounts required for licensure as a psychiatric technician.
(11) Existing law, the Massage Therapy Act, provides for the certification and regulation of massage therapists by the California Massage Therapy Council and requires an applicant for certification as a massage therapist to pass a massage and bodywork competency assessment examination.
This bill would make that examination requirement inoperative from January 1, 2019, until January 1, 2021.
(12) The Veterinary Medicine Practice Act regulates the practice of veterinary medicine by the Veterinary Medical
Board and makes a violation of its provisions a crime. Existing law separately provides immunity from liability to a veterinarian or registered veterinary technician who renders services during certain states of emergency.
This bill would authorize a California-licensed veterinarian at a registered premises located within a 25-mile radius of any declared condition of emergency to, in good faith, provide veterinary services without establishing a veterinarian-client-patient relationship and dispense or prescribe a dangerous drug or device where failure to provide services or medications may result in loss of life or intense suffering. The bill would provide immunity from liability for a veterinarian providing those services.
Existing law excludes specified persons from the provisions regulating the practice of veterinary medicine, including veterinary medicine students in 2 specified schools of veterinary medicine who
participate in diagnosis and treatment, as specified.
This bill would instead exclude students from any veterinary medical program accredited by the American Veterinary Medical Association Council on Education who participate in diagnosis or treatment with direct supervision, or surgery with immediate supervision, subject to specified conditions.
Existing law provides for a veterinary assistant controlled substance permit issued by the Veterinary Medical Board to qualified applicants and authorizes the board to deny, revoke, or suspend a veterinary assistant controlled substance permit for specified reasons.
This bill would add to the list of reasons the conviction of a crime substantially related to the qualifications, functions, or duties of veterinary medicine, veterinary surgery, or veterinary dentistry. The bill would also authorize the board, in addition to denial,
revocation, or suspension, to issue a probationary veterinary assistant controlled substance permit.
The bill would prohibit a graduate of a veterinary college from performing animal health care tasks otherwise performed by a registered veterinary technician, except as specified, and would require a veterinarian to offer a consultation to the client each time he or she initially prescribes, dispenses, or furnishes a dangerous drug, as defined, to an animal patient in an outpatient setting. Because a violation of that provision would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
Existing law requires the Veterinary Medical Board to establish a regular inspection program, and provides that the board is required to make every effort to inspect at least 20% of veterinary premises annually.
This bill would instead require the board to inspect at least 20% of
veterinary premises annually.
(13) Existing law requires a person to meet specified requirements in order to use the title “certified common interest development manager,” and requires a certified common interest development manager to make specified disclosures to the board of directors of a common interest development before providing services to the common interest development. Existing law repeals those provisions governing certified common interest development managers on January 1, 2019.
This bill would delete the repeal provision, thereby extending those provisions indefinitely.
(14) Existing law, the Chiropractic Act, enacted by initiative, provides for the licensure and regulation of chiropractors by the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners, which is composed of 7 members appointed by the Governor, and establishes an application
fee of not more than $100 and, on and after January 1, 2019, a renewal fee of $250. Existing law authorizes the Legislature to fix the amounts of the fees payable by applicants and licensees, and directs the deposit of these fees into the State Board of Chiropractic Examiners’ Fund, a continuously appropriated fund.
This bill would delete the provisions providing for the application and renewal fees and would instead establish a schedule of regulatory fees necessary to carry out the responsibilities required by the Chiropractic Initiative Act, including, among others, application and renewal fees for licensure, fees to apply for approval for a continuing education course, and satellite office certificate fees. By increasing specified fees and establishing new fees for deposit into a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.
(15) The bill would make technical changes to
various provisions of the Business and Professions Code. The bill would also make technical changes to various provisions of the Health and Safety Code by eliminating cross-references to obsolete provisions governing cemeteries.
(16) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.