Amended
IN
Assembly
June 30, 2016 |
Amended
IN
Senate
May 31, 2016 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 13, 2016 |
Introduced by Senator Huff (Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Chang and Olsen) (Coauthor: Senator Roth) (Coauthor: Assembly Member Medina) |
February 19, 2016 |
This bill would require, instead of authorize, the governing board of the school district of choice to ensure, by resolution, that pupils accepted for transfer are selected through a random, unbiased
process that prohibits an evaluation of whether or not the pupil should be enrolled based upon his or her academic or athletic performance. The bill would authorize only a pupil’s school district of residence to prohibit the transfer of a pupil into a school district of choice or limit the number of pupils transferred into a school district of choice if the governing board of the school district of residence determines that the transfer would negatively impact a court-ordered or voluntary desegregation plan of the school district of residence or the racial and ethnic balance of the school district of residence. The bill would revise the provisions relating to the audit. To the extent this would impose additional duties on county superintendents of schools, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(2)Existing law authorizes a school district of residence, as defined, to limit the number of pupils who transfer out each year by a
certain percentage, and also authorizes a school district with an average daily attendance of less than 50,000 to limit the maximum number of pupils transferring out for the duration of the program to 10% of the average daily attendance for that period. Existing law authorizes a school district of residence to limit transfers if it has a negative or qualified status on the most recent budget certification, or to limit the number of pupils to a number identified by the county superintendent of schools, as specified, if the county superintendent determines that the school district will not meet the standards and criteria for fiscal stability for the subsequent fiscal year due to the impact of additional pupil transfers in that fiscal year.
This bill would authorize a school district of residence with an average daily attendance of 50,000 or less to limit the maximum number of pupils enrolled in all school districts of choice, at any given time, to 10% of the average
daily attendance. The bill would also establish procedures, as provided, by which school districts of residence may implement the limits.
(3)Existing law authorizes a school district of choice to notify a school district of residence when the school district of choice accepts a pupil from that school district of residence.
This bill would instead require a school district of choice to notify a school district of residence when the school district of choice accepts or provisionally accepts a pupil from that school district of residence, as specified.
(4)Existing law authorizes school districts to make information regarding their schools, programs, policies, and procedures available to any interested person upon request.
This bill would require a school district of choice to make public
announcements regarding its schools, programs, policies, and procedures during the enrollment period. To the extent this would impose additional duties on school districts, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(5)Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst annually to make specified information regarding districts of choice transfers available to the Governor and the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature.
This bill would instead assign those duties to the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
(6)Existing law requires the Legislative Analyst to conduct, after consulting with appropriate legislative staff, a comprehensive evaluation of the district of choice program, make recommendations regarding the extension of the program, incorporate in that evaluation the data annually made available by the
Department of Finance, and complete and submit the evaluation and the recommendations to the appropriate education policy committees of the Legislature and the Governor by January 31, 2016.
This bill would, instead, require the Legislative Analyst to complete and submit the evaluation and the recommendations to the appropriate education policy committees of the Legislature and the Governor by January 31, 2020.
(7)
(8)This bill would make other related changes, make clarifying changes, recast certain provisions of existing law, and make other nonsubstantive changes.
(9)
(c)
(d)
(e)
(7)