(1) Existing law designates air pollution control districts and air quality management districts as having the primary responsibility for the control of air pollution from all sources other than vehicular sources. Existing law also designates the State Air Resources Board as the state entity responsible for the coordination and review of all levels of government in their efforts to control air pollution.
This bill would require the state board to develop guidelines by December 31, 2005, for districts to permit the installation of distributed energy resources and for determining the criteria for qualification as an ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation resource, as prescribed.
(2) Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations and gas corporations, and authorizes the commission to fix just and reasonable rates and charges, subject to control by the Legislature. Existing law defines the term “public utility” for the purposes of regulation the Public Utilities Act.
This bill would exempt from that definition the ownership, control, operation, or management of a distributed energy resource, as defined.
(3) Existing law defines the term “cogeneration” to mean the sequential use of energy for the production of electrical and useful thermal energy, and requires, where useful thermal energy follows power production, or the reverse, that (1) at least 5% of the facility’s total annual energy output be in the form of useful thermal energy, and (2) the useful annual power output plus one-half1/2 the useful annual thermal energy output to equal not less than 42.5 percent % of any natural gas and oil energy input.
This bill would modify that the second requirement to allow, as an alternative, that the facility’s total system efficiency at 100% equals equal at least 60% efficiency on a high heating value.
(4) Existing law defines “distributed energy resources” to mean any electric generation technology that meets certain criteria, including (1) having commenced initial operation between May 1, 2001, and June 1, 2003, except that gas-fired distributed energy resources that are not operated in a combined heat and power application must commence operation no later than September 1, 2002, (2) being located within a single facility, and (3) being 5 megawatts or smaller in aggregate capacity. Existing law defines “ultra-clean ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation” as an electric generation technology that produces zero emissions during operation or that produces emissions that are equal to or less than limits established by the State Air Resources Board, if the electric generation technology commences operation between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008. That definition requires that technologies operating by combustion operate in a combined heat and power application with a 60-percent 60% system efficiency on a higher heating value.
This bill would expand the distributed energy resources criterion in the definition of distributed energy resources to include electric generation technology that commenced initial operation between after May 1, 2001, and June 1, 2008 that is located within a single facility or contiguous area of common ownership, and that is 20 megawatts or smaller in aggregate capacity. The bill would modify the ultra-clean ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation requirement to require technologies operating by combustion in a combined heat and power application operate with a 60-percent system efficiency on a higher heating value (1) that the facility meet the definition of a distributed energy resource except for the commencement of operations, (2) commence initial operation between January 1, 2003, and December 31, 2008, and (3) produce zero emissions during its operation or produce emissions that are at least equal to the 2007 State Air Resources Board emission limits for distributed generation. Until the board establishes the 2007 emission limits, ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation would be required to meet those emission requirements, discussed below, to be eligible for the self-generation incentive program. Ultraclean and low-emission technologies operated by combustion would be required to meet the requirements for cogeneration.
(5) Existing law requires the commission to require each electrical corporation under the operational control of the Independent System Operator (ISO) as of January 1, 2001, to modify its tariffs so that all customers that install new distributed energy resources in accordance with specified criteria are served under rates, rules, and requirements identical to those of a customer within the same rate schedule that does not use distributed energy resources, and to withdraw any provisions in otherwise applicable tariffs that activate other tariffs, rates, or rules if a customer uses distributed energy resources. Existing law imposes certain requirements on customers with distributed energy resources to qualify for the modified tariffs. Existing law requires each electrical corporation, as part of its distribution planning process, to consider nonutility owned distributed energy resources as a possible alternative to investments in its distribution system in order to ensure reliable electric service at the lowest possible cost.
This bill would require each electrical corporation, in setting rates and establishing tariffs, to treat customer use of distributed energy resources as a reduction of customer load an energy efficiency measure. The bill would delete those the tariff qualification requirements.
The bill would prohibit the ISO from requiring the metering, telemetry, or scheduling of a retail customer’s consumption of electric energy that is satisfied by onsite or over-the-fence generation by distributed energy resources beyond the point of interconnection. The bill would also prohibit the ISO from assessing any grid management or transmission charges on a retail customer’s consumption of electric energy that is satisfied by onsite or over-the-fence generation by distributed energy resources beyond the point of interconnection. The bill would require the ISO to establish and maintain an ongoing demand reduction tariff that allows for the participation of distributed energy resources no later than January 1, 2005. The bill would require the ISO to establish and maintain a capacity market that recognizes the value of generation capacity supplied by distributed energy resources as being functionally equivalent to central station generation.
The
(6) Existing law imposes cost responsibility surcharges on retail end-use customers of electrical corporations and community choice aggregators to repay certain costs of the Department of Water Resources and electrical corporations. Under the existing Public Utilities Act, the commission requires electrical corporations to identify a separate rate component to fund programs that enhance system reliability and provide in-state benefits (a system benefits charge). This system benefits charge is a nonbypassable element of local distribution and collected on the basis of usage.
Existing law requires each electrical corporation, as part of its distribution planning process, to consider nonutility owned distributed energy resources as a possible alternative to investments in its distribution system in order to ensure reliable electric service at the lowest possible cost. Existing law provides that notwithstanding this requirement, no customer employing distributed energy resources is exempt from reasonable interconnection charges, that the use of distributed energy resources does not relieve the customer of its obligation to pay cost recovery surcharges, and that the use of distributed energy resources is prohibited from resulting in a reduction in contributions by each customer class to system benefits charges.
This bill would additionally require each electrical corporation, as part of its distribution planning process, to establish a minimum target for nonutility owned distributed energy resources in its procurement plans. The bill would require the commission to authorize each electrical corporation to retain certain a percentage of ratepayer savings as profits a shareholder benefit, that is equal to the authorized rate of return for the year the savings occur. The bill would provide that, except for these requirements, no customer employing distributed energy resources is exempt from reasonable interconnection charges, that the use of distributed energy resources does not relieve the customer of its obligation to pay cost recovery surcharges, and that the use of distributed energy resources is prohibited from resulting in a reduction in contributions by each customer class to system benefits charges. The bill would provide that a customer receiving electricity through a direct transaction that is subject to a cost responsibility surcharge, that installs ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation resources, is responsible for the cost responsibility surcharge that is applicable to the distributed energy resource departing load, and is not responsible for paying the direct access cost responsibility surcharge for the electricity that the ultraclean and low-emission distributed generation resource generates.
(6)
(7) Existing law requires the commission to require each electrical corporation to establish new tariffs on or before January 1, 2003, for customers using distributed energy resources, but, after January 1, 2003, distributed energy resources that meet certain criteria are subject only to those tariffs in existence, until June 1, 2011, subject to a specified exception. Existing law requires those tariffs to ensure that all net distribution costs incurred to serve each customer class are fully recovered only from that class. Existing law requires the commission to prepare and submit to the Legislature, on or before June 1, 2002, a report describing its proposed methodology for determining the new rates and the process by which it will establish those rates.
This bill would extend all of those deadlines by 3 years, would delete that specified exception, and, with respect to cost recovery, would require the commission to require that benefits that inure to all rate classes be netted from the costs, if any, in each customer class. The bill would require the commission to require the modification of tariffs as prescribed.
The bill would provide that, if nonbypassable charges are duplicated as a result of switching from electric to gas service, charges levied under gas rate schedules that support the same programs covered by the nonbypassable electric charges may not be assessed on customers.
(7)
(8) Existing law requires the commission, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, to administer until January 1, 2008, a self-generation incentive program for distributed generation resources, in the same form as existed on January 1, 2004, but requires that combustion-operated distributed generation projects using fossil fuels commencing January 1, 2005, meet a NOx emission standard, and commencing January 1, 2007, meet a more stringent NOx emission standard and a minimum efficiency standard, to be eligible for incentive rebates under the program.
This bill would also require the self-generation incentive program to allow all projects that meet the definition of distributed energy resources to participate in the program, except that only the first 1,000 kilowatts of facility capacity would be eligible for funding.
(8)Under existing law, the commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including gas corporations, and authorizes the commission to fix just and reasonable rates and charges.
This
(9) This bill would require the commission, on or before May 1, 2005, to require a gas corporation to establish a new distributed energy resources gas rate.
(9)
(10) Under existing law, the violation of an order, decision, or other requirement of the commission is a crime.
This bill, by requiring the commission to impose a number of requirements on electrical corporations, the violation of which requirements by an electrical corporation would be crimes, would create new crimes, thereby imposing a state-mandated local program.
(10)(11) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.