(1) The existing California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the Department of Conservation, for each beverage container, as defined, sold or transferred, for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. Existing law sets the amount of the redemption payment as 2.5¢ for every beverage container, and 5¢ for beverage containers with a capacity of 24 or more fluid ounces. The department is required to pay a processor the refund value for every empty beverage container received by the processor from a recycler and existing law sets the refund value as 5¢ for every 2 beverage containers redeemed or for a single beverage container with a capacity of 24 or more ounces and 3¢ for a single beverage container. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, processing payments, and for other purposes.
A violation of the act is a crime.
This bill would increase the amount of the redemption payment to 4¢ for every beverage container sold or transferred and would increase the redemption payment for beverage containers with a capacity of 24 or more ounces to 8¢. The bill would increase the refund value to 8¢ for every 2 beverage containers redeemed or for a single beverage container with a capacity of 24 or more ounces, and 4¢ for a single beverage container. The bill would also provide for an increase in the amount of the redemption payment and refund value, on July 1, 2007, to 5¢ and, if the beverage container has a capacity of 24 ounces or more, to 10¢, if the aggregate recycling rate for all beverage containers subject to the act is less than 75% for the 12-month reporting period from January 1, 2006, to December 31, 2006, or for any calendar year thereafter. Since these funds would be deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation. The bill would also make conforming changes regarding the labeling requirements for beverage containers subject to the act.
(2) The existing act authorizes the department to pay a quality glass incentive payment of up to $25 per ton, not to exceed a total amount of $3,000,000 per calendar year. The department is authorized to make these payments to an operator of any curbside recycling program or any certified entity that color-sorts glass beverage containers for recycling.
This bill would increase the amount of the payment to $30 per ton.
(3) The act authorizes the department to annually pay curbside programs and neighborhood dropoff programs up to $15,000,000, based on the volume of containers collected during the fiscal year.
This bill would revise the method of determining the volume of beverage containers collected, for purposes of these payments, to the volume collected during the calendar year.
(4) Under the act, whenever a glass container manufacturer rejects a load of redeemed glass, the glass container manufacturer is required to fill out a standardized rejection form. A certified processor seeking to dispose of those containers is prohibited from disposing of those rejected postfilled containers unless the certified processor first submits to the department, in writing, a request to dispose of the rejected material. Existing law requires glass container manufacturers and processors to take all possible steps to avert the disposal of the loads of postfilled containers, as determined by the department.
This bill would revise these provisions to instead require every container manufacturer to fill out a standardized rejection form and would include all beverage container materials within those disposal prohibitions. Because a violation of the act is a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by changing the definition of a crime.
(5) Existing law requires the department to annually review and, if necessary in order to ensure payment of the most accurate commingled rate feasible, recalculate commingled rates paid for beverage containers and postfilled containers paid to curbside recycling programs, collection programs, and recycling centers.
This bill would require the department to conduct this review by the 90th day after the effective date of the bill, and annually thereafter.
The bill would authorize the department to calculate a specified curbside program commingled rate for bimetal containers and specified types of plastic containers. The bill would authorize the department to enter into a contract to calculate the commingled rate and would authorize the department to not calculate the commingled rate, if the department determines specified revenues are insufficient to pay for that contract.
(6) The existing act requires the department to calculate a processing fee and a processing payment for each beverage container with a specified scrap value. The scrap value is required to be based upon the actual costs for recycling a container type and the department is required to make this determination every 3rd year. The processing fee is required to be paid by beverage manufacturers for each beverage container sold or transferred to a dealer. The department is required to set the processing fee to equal 65% of the processing payment that the department pays to processors, but the department is required to reduce the amount of the processing fee, based upon the availability of funds in each materials processing fee account for that beverage material type, so that the amount of the processing fee equals 25% of the processing payment.
Existing law requires the department to deposit the processing fees and an amount of funds equal to 75% of the processing payments in separate processing fee accounts in the fund, and the money in each processing fee account is continuously appropriated to the department to pay processing payments. A processing fee is not imposed on a PET plastic beverage container if a willing purchaser offers to purchase empty plastic beverage containers at a voluntary artificial scrap value, as defined, that, when combined with specified payments, is equal to or less than the recycling cost.
This bill would require the department to calculate the processing payments for 2003, based on the January 1, 2002, recycling costs, and to determine the actual costs for certified recycling centers, on and after January 1, 2004, every 2nd year, as annually adjusted for inflation.
The bill would delete the requirement that the department reduce the amount of the processing fee to equal 25% of the processing payment, and would instead require that the processing fee be reduced to a specified percentage of the processing payment, based on the recycling rate of that container type. The bill would also revise the amount of funds that the department is required to deposit in the separate processing fee accounts in accordance with the changes made by the bill, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would prescribe the recycling costs for non-PET plastic containers for the January 1, 2002, calculation of the processing fee.
The bill would authorize the department to adjust the amount of the processing payment not more than once every 3 months, if the department makes certain determinations.
This bill would revise the definition of voluntary artificial scrap value and would instead prohibit the imposition of a processing fee on PET plastic containers, if a willing purchaser offers to purchase empty PET containers at a voluntary artificial scrap value that is equal to the reduced processing fee when applied to all containers sold.
The bill would require the department to establish a supplemental processing payment that would be paid by the department to a processor, who would be required to pay that amount to a recycler. The bill would authorize a recycler to receive a supplemental processing payment if the recycler receives processing payments and would require those supplemental processing payments to be based on the volume of redeemed containers subject to that supplemental processing fee that the recycler reports for each whole month, commencing on July 1, 2004, and continuing for a period of 12 consecutive months. The bill would specify the amount of the supplemental processing payments for glass, PET plastic containers, and HDPE plastic containers. The bill would require a recycler to report to a processor the volume of redeemed containers subject to the supplemental processing payments. The bill would require the department to pay the supplemental processing payments on eligible redeemed containers to processors in the same manner as it pays refund values, except as specified.
The bill would require the department to establish a processing fee rebate for manufacturers for all beverage containers for which a processing fee was paid on containers sold between January 1, 2002, and December 31, 2003. The bill would continuously appropriate the money in the fund to the department to make those rebates, thereby making an appropriation.
(7) Existing law requires the department to pay a total of $23,500,000 annually in handling fees to supermarket sites and certain recyclers to provide an incentive to redeem beverage containers, and requires, as a condition of eligibility for these payments, that the site or recycler redeem not less than 60,000 beverage containers or, except for nonprofit organizations, not more than 500,000 beverage containers, during the calendar month in which the handling fee is paid.
This bill would increase, as of July 1, 2002, to $26,500,000 the amount the department is annually required to expend to pay these handling fees, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would provide for an alternative handling fee eligibility requirement of redeeming an average of not less than 60,000 beverage containers per month during the previous 12 months and would delete the limit of 500,000 beverage containers.
(8) Existing law requires the department to annually expend $300,000 until January 1, 2003, pursuant to a cooperative agreement with Keep California Beautiful, to conduct a statewide public education campaign to prevent and cleanup beverage container litter. Under the existing program, $500,000 may be expended annually in the form of grants for beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs. Existing law requires the department to expend, from January 1, 2000, to January 1, 2002, up to $10,000,000 for a statewide public education campaign to promote increased recycling.
This bill would extend the date for the statewide public education campaign to prevent and cleanup beverage container litter to January 1, 2005, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would authorize the department to annually expend up to $5,000,000 for a statewide public education campaign to increase recycling, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would increase to $1,500,000, the sum authorized to be spent annually in the form of grants for beverage container recycling and litter reduction programs, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would authorize the department to spend up to $10,000,000 annually, until January 1, 2007, to issue grants for recycling market development and expansion-related activities aimed at increasing the recycling of beverage containers, thereby making an appropriation.
The bill would authorize the department to transfer up to $10,000,000 to the Recycling Infrastructure Loan Guarantee Account on a one-time basis, which the bill would create as a revolving account in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund. The bill would continuously appropriate the money in the account to the department to issue loan guarantees for capital expenditures for new recycling infrastructure located in the state and would allow the department to issue a loan guarantee from the account only if the department makes specified determinations.
(9) The California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act defines “convenience zone” for the purposes of the act and requires that every convenience zone be served by at least one certified recycling center, with specified operating hours. The act requires, if the recycling center consists of reverse vending machines or other unmanned automated equipment, that the equipment be properly functioning, accept all types of empty beverage containers at the recycling location, and pay posted refund values.
This bill would require the department, from January 1, 2004, to December 31, 2006, inclusive, to establish a pilot program using supermarket sites that use both reverse vending machines and staffed recycling centers to determine whether or not these recycling centers increase recycling rates and provide greater convenience and ease of use for consumers. The bill would provide that a recycling center that is a supermarket site and consists of reverse vending machines is open for business for purposes of the act if the department authorizes the supermarket site to participate in the pilot program, pursuant to specified eligibility requirements, and the supermarket site complies with specified operating requirements. The bill would require a supermarket site participating in the pilot program to be operational at least 95% of operable time as defined, to provide a receptacle adjacent to the reverse vending machine for certain types of beverage containers larger than 3 liters, and to be open for business at least 20 hours per week.
The bill would require a supermarket site participating in the pilot project to be open for business for at least 30 hours each week if the department determines that the volume of beverage containers redeemed at the supermarket site has decreased by a specified amount. The bill would require the department to monitor the volume of beverage containers redeemed at each supermarket site participating in the pilot program at least once every 3-month period, and to conduct an annual review of each supermarket site participating in the pilot program.
The bill would repeal the authorization for the pilot program January 1, 2007, unless a later enacted statute that is enacted before January 1, 2007, deletes or extends that date. The bill would require the department to report to the Governor and Legislature by July 1, 2006, on the effectiveness of the pilot program and make recommendations.
(10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement, including the creation of a State Mandates Claims Fund to pay the costs of mandates that do not exceed $1,000,000 statewide and other procedures for claims whose statewide costs exceed $1,000,000.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.