(1) Existing law authorizes the Department of Boating and Waterways to make loans to cities, counties, and districts for the planning, acquisition, construction, improvement, maintenance, or operation of small craft harbors and facilities in connection with those harbors, and connecting waterways. Existing law requires the department to establish, by rules and regulations, policies and standards to be followed in making these loans, and authorizes these rules and regulations to include policies and standards for restrooms, vessel pumpout facilities, oil recycling facilities, and receptacles for the purpose of separating, reusing, or recycling all solid waste materials.
This bill would, instead, require the rules and regulations established by the department under this provision to include policies and standards for restrooms, vessel pumpout facilities, oil recycling facilities, and receptacles for the purpose of separating, reusing, or recycling all solid waste materials.
(2) Existing law defines a “mercury-added novelty” as a mercury-added product intended mainly for personal or household enjoyment or adornment.
This bill would exclude from that definition a product that contains no mercury other than in a mercury-added button cell battery.
(3) The existing California Environmental Quality Act requires that all public and private activities or undertakings pursuant to, or in furtherance of, a redevelopment plan be deemed to be a single project.
This bill would specify that an environmental impact report for a redevelopment plan may be a master environmental impact report, a program environmental impact report, or a project environmental impact report. The bill would require the environmental impact report for a redevelopment plan to specify the type of environmental impact report to be prepared for that plan.
(4) The existing California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, establishes an integrated waste management program. Under existing law, the act requires each city, county, city and county, and regional agency, if any, to develop a source reduction and recycling element of an integrated waste management plan containing specified components. The first and each subsequent revision of the element is required to divert 50% of the solid waste subject to the element, on and after January 1, 2000, except as specified.
This bill would revise the requirements for the granting of a time extension from these diversion requirements applicable to cities incorporated after January 1, 1990, and before January 1, 2001, and applicable to cities incorporated on or after January 1, 2001. The bill would make related and conforming changes.
(5) Existing law requires a community service district or sanitary district that provides solid waste handling services or implements source reduction and recycling programs to comply with the source reduction and recycling element and household hazardous waste element of the jurisdiction in which the district is located, and to provide the city, county, or regional agency in which it is located information on the programs implemented by the district and the amount of waste disposed and diverted within the district. A district is authorized to impose a fee, in a specified manner, for the costs of complying with these requirements.
This bill would additionally include a public utility district that provides these services or implements these programs within those requirements. The bill would impose a state-mandated local program by imposing new duties upon local agencies.
(6) Existing laws relating to the storage and disposal of used and waste tires and the transportation of waste tires define “used tire” to mean a tire meeting specified requirements, including a requirement of being stored by size in a rack or a stack, but not in a pile.
This bill would amend this requirement to specify that, for purposes of the storage and disposal of used tires, the used tire is ready for resale, stored by size in a rack or a stack not more than 2 rows wide, and stored in accordance with local fire and vector control requirements and with state minimum standards, but for purposes of the transportation of used tires, the bill would delete the storage requirement.
(7) Existing law relating to the storage and disposal of used and waste tires exempts from the definition of “minor waste tire facility” a tire dealer or an automobile dismantler, as defined, who stores used or waste tires on the dealer’s or dismantler’s premises for less than 90 days under prescribed conditions.
This bill would delete a tire dealer or automobile dismantler who stores used tires from this exemption from the definition of “minor waste tire facility.”
(8) Existing law authorizes the California Integrated Waste Management Board to refuse to issue or renew or to suspend or revoke a waste tire facility permit under certain conditions. Any person who stores, stockpiles, or accumulates waste tires at a location for which a waste tire facility permit is required, or in violation of the terms and conditions of the permit, existing law, or the regulations adopted under existing law, is required, upon order of the board, to clean up those waste tires or abate the effects thereof, or, in the case of threatened pollution or nuisance, take other necessary remedial action. The board is authorized, individually or in cooperation with any other governmental agency, to expend available moneys to perform any cleanup, abatement, or remedial work required under these circumstances if that action is required by the magnitude of endeavor or the need for prompt action to prevent substantial pollution, nuisance, or injury to the public health or safety. A governmental agency that cooperates with the board in the cleanup, abatement, or remedial work is authorized to recover its costs in a civil action.
This bill would provide that any costs or damages incurred under these provisions by the board constitute a lien upon the real property owned by any responsible party that is subject to the remedial action. The bill would prohibit the board from being considered a responsible party for a remediated site merely because a lien is imposed under this provision. The bill would require all funds recovered under this provision on behalf of the board’s waste tire stabilization and abatement program to be deposited in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund, which contains money that is available, upon appropriation, for expenditure for specified purposes.
(9) Existing law requires the board to initiate a program for the cleanup of solid waste disposal sites and for the cleanup of solid waste at codisposal sites, as defined, where the responsible party either cannot be identified or is unable or unwilling to pay for timely remediation, and where cleanup is needed to protect public health and safety or the environment. The board is required, to the extent possible, to seek repayment from responsible parties for its expenses incurred under the cleanup program, in an amount equal to the amount expended, a reasonable amount for the board’s cost of contract administration, and an amount equal to the interest that would have been earned on the expended funds. The amount of any cost incurred by the board under these provisions are recoverable from responsible parties in a civil action brought by the board or, upon the request of the board, by the Attorney General.
This bill would provide that, in addition to the remedies in existing law described above, any costs or damages incurred under these provisions by the board constitute a lien upon the real property owned by any responsible party that is subject to the remedial action. The bill would prohibit the board from being considered a responsible party for a remediated site merely because a lien is imposed under this provision. The bill would require all funds recovered under this provision on behalf of the solid waste disposal and codisposal site cleanup program to be deposited in the Solid Waste Disposal Site Cleanup Trust Fund, which is a continuously appropriated fund in the State Treasury. The bill thereby would make an appropriation by increasing the amount of funds available for appropriation in a continuously appropriated fund.
(10) Existing law imposes a California tire fee in a specified amount on every person who purchases a new tire.
This bill would exempt from the California tire fee any tire sold with, or sold separately for use on, any self-propelled wheelchair, any motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle, as defined, and any vehicle that is similar to a motorized tricycle or motorized quadricycle and is designed to be operated by a person who, by reason of the person’s physical disability, is otherwise unable to move about as a pedestrian.
(11) Existing law requires the board to adopt a 5-year plan, to be updated every 2 years, to establish goals and priorities for the waste tire program and each program element. Existing law requires the 5-year plan to describe the effectiveness of each program element, including, among other things, a description of the effectiveness of cleanup, abatement, or other remedial action related to tire stockpiles throughout the state, and a description of the research directed at promoting and developing alternatives to the landfill disposal of tires.
This bill would specify that these descriptions relate to waste tires.
(12) Under existing law, the money in the California Tire Recycling Management Fund is authorized to be expended by the board, upon appropriation in the annual Budget Act, for specified purposes concerning tire recycling, the disposal of used tires, and for a program of grants to local government entities.
This bill would make technical revisions to the authorized purposes for expenditure of the money in the fund.
(13) Existing law requires the Department of Transportation to annually report to the Legislature and the board on the use of waste tires in transportation and civil engineering projects during the previous 5 years, including, but not limited to, the approximate number of tires used every year.
This bill would specify that this report is to include the approximate number of waste tires used every year.
(14) Existing law defines, among other things, “tire derived product” and “used tire” for the purposes of the provisions regulating the transportation of used and waste tires.
This bill would make technical changes in these definitions, and would add definitions of the terms “waste tire generator” and “waste tire generating business” to those provisions.
(15) Existing law requires a registered waste and used tire hauler to only transport waste or used tires to a facility that is permitted by the board, or exempted to accept waste and used tires, or to a facility that lawfully accepts waste or used tires for reuse or disposal.
This bill would, instead, require a registered waste and used tire hauler to only transport waste or used tires to a facility that is permitted, excluded, exempted, or otherwise authorized by the board, by statute, or by regulation, to accept waste and used tires, or to a facility that lawfully accepts waste or used tires for reuse or disposal.
(16) Existing law provides that a person who hauls waste or used tires is exempt from registration if the person meets at least one of 9 specified standards, including status as a solid waste collector operating under a license or franchise from any local government who transports fewer than 10 waste or used tires at any one time.
This bill would delete that standard.
(17) The bill would also make various technical changes in existing law relating to solid waste and hazardous waste.
(18) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
(19) The bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.