Status


Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | print page

AB-2088 K–14 classified employees: part-time or full-time vacancies: public postings.(2023-2024)

Senate
Assembly
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto
Senate
Assembly
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto

Bill Status
AB-2088
McCarty (A)
-
-
K–14 classified employees: part-time or full-time vacancies: public postings.
03/07/24
An act to add Sections 45139.5 and 88039 to the Education Code, relating to classified employees.
Assembly
09/04/24
08/23/24

Type of Measure
Inactive Bill - Vetoed
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Non-Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
09/22/24 Vetoed by Governor.
09/11/24 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
08/30/24 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 52. Noes 14.).
08/30/24 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
08/29/24 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 22. Noes 14.).
Governor's Message
To the Members of the California State Assembly: 

I am returning Assembly Bill 2088 without my signature. 

This bill requires school and community college employers, in both merit and non-merit districts, to offer part-time and full-time classified positions to current regular non-probationary classified employees a first refusal over all applicants, with specified exceptions, during a 10-day notice period. This bill allows the employer to advertise the position, but prohibits them from offering it to an external applicant until the 10-day notice period expires and no eligible employee candidate has applied.

This bill is significantly similar to Assembly Bill 1699 of 2023, which I vetoed, and several of the same concerns remain. In particular, like Assembly Bill 1699, this bill may have unintended consequences that are not in the best interest of students. As noted previously, this issue is already bargainable and several local bargaining agreements have such provisions in place. Placing specific requirements in statute - as this bill does - may make it more difficult for local processes to develop an alternative that best meets the needs of the district, employees, and students.

For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.

Sincerely, 




Gavin Newsom