Status


Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | print page

SB-1065 California Abandoned and Derelict Commercial Vessel Program.(2021-2022)

Senate
Assembly
1st
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto
Senate
Assembly
1st
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto

Bill Status
SB-1065
Eggman (S)
-
Cooper (A) , Dodd (S) , Grayson (A) , Nielsen (S)
California Abandoned and Derelict Commercial Vessel Program.
-
An act to add Section 528 to the Harbors and Navigation Code, and to add Sections 6112 and 6113 to the Public Resources Code, relating to vessels.
Senate
09/01/22
08/23/22

Type of Measure
Active Bill - In Floor Process
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
11/30/22 Last day to consider Governor's veto pursuant to Joint Rule 58.5.
09/28/22 In Senate. Consideration of Governor's veto pending.
09/28/22 Vetoed by the Governor.
09/06/22 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
08/30/22 Assembly amendments concurred in. (Ayes 37. Noes 0. Page 5332.) Ordered to engrossing and enrolling.
Governor's Message
To the Members of the California State Senate: 

I am returning Senate Bill 1065 without my signature.

This bill would establish the California Abandoned and Derelict Commercial Vessel Program and a multi-agency task force to identify, prioritize, and fund the removal of abandoned and derelict commercial vessels across the state.

While I support the author's attempt to create a statewide approach to address abandoned and derelict commercial vessels in California that pose significant public health, safety, and environmental risks, this program was not accounted for in the budget. Implementation across the relevant agencies is expected to cost about $25 million in year 1 with ongoing general fund impacts.

With our state facing lower-than-expected revenues over the first few months of this fiscal year, it is important to remain disciplined when it comes to spending, particularly spending that is ongoing. We must prioritize existing obligations and priorities, including education, health care, public safety and safety-net programs.

The Legislature sent measures with potential costs of well over $20 billion in one-time spending commitments and more than $10 billion in ongoing commitments not accounted for in the state budget. Bills with significant fiscal impact, such as this measure, should be considered and accounted for as part of the annual budget process.


For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.


Sincerely, 




Gavin Newsom