Status


Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | print page

AB-2124 Pupil Support Training Program.(2021-2022)

Senate
Assembly
Int
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto
Senate
Assembly
Int
Cmt
2nd
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto

Bill Status
AB-2124
Cristina Garcia (A)
Portantino (S)
-
Pupil Support Training Program.
03/18/22
An act to add Article 3.5 (commencing with Section 49445) to Chapter 9 of Part 27 of Division 4 of Title 2 of the Education Code, relating to pupil health.
Assembly
08/26/22
08/11/22

Type of Measure
Inactive Bill - Vetoed
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
09/18/22 Vetoed by Governor.
08/31/22 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
08/24/22 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 77. Noes 0. Page 6125.).
08/24/22 Assembly Rule 77(a) suspended. (Ayes 56. Noes 16. Page 6114.)
08/23/22 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 25 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
Governor's Message
To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 2124 without my signature.

This bill would establish a high school Pupil Peer Support Training Program, developed and administered by the State Superintendent of Public Instruction, before January 1, 2024, contingent on funding in a future state budget.

Peer support programs are valuable, which is why the 2022 Budget Act funded a substantially similar program. AB 178 allocated $10 million for the School-Based Peer Mental Health Demonstration project. This grant program will provide competitive grants to high schools to develop peer-to-peer support programs.
With our state facing lower-than-expected revenues over the first few months of this fiscal year, it is important to remain disciplined when it comes to spending, particularly spending that is ongoing. We must prioritize existing obligations and priorities, including education, health care, public safety and safety-net programs.
The Legislature sent measures with potential costs of well over $20 billion in one-time spending commitments and more than $10 billion in ongoing commitments not accounted for in the state budget. Bills that create significant General Fund cost pressure, such as this measure, should be considered in the annual budget process. For these reasons, I cannot sign this bill.




Sincerely,




Gavin Newsom