Status

PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | print page

AB-313 Water.(2017-2018)

Senate:1stCmt3rdPass
Assembly:1stCmt2nd3rdPassPassVeto
Bill Status
AB-313
Gray (A)
-
-
Water.
03/09/17
An act to add Article 2.5 (commencing with Section 11375) to Chapter 4 of Part 1 of Division 3 of Title 2 of the Government Code, and to amend Section 1825 of, to amend, repeal, and add Sections 1055, 1552, and 1845 of, to add Section 1837 to, and to repeal and add Article 2 (commencing with Section 1831) of Chapter 12 of Part 2 of Division 2 of, the Water Code, relating to water.
Assembly
09/19/17
07/18/17

Type of Measure
Inactive Bill - Vetoed
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
10/15/17 Vetoed by Governor.
09/27/17 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m.
09/16/17 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 54. Noes 13. Page 3547.).
09/16/17 Assembly Rule 63 suspended. (Page 3547.)
09/16/17 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending.
Governor's Veto Message
To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 313 without my signature.

This bill would transfer the responsibility for conducting adjudicative hearings of certain water rights enforcement actions from the State Water Resources Control Board to a new Water Rights Division in the Office of Administrative Hearings.

While I acknowledge the author's intent to increase fairness and transparency in enforcement actions taken by the Board, the bill would not work as intended. It would be difficult to recruit and retain qualified water lawyers to meet the rigid requirements of the bill. The bill creates a new division that would only conduct limited types of water right hearings, which may further complicate the process. The costs would be borne only by some water right holders but not others, regardless of who benefits.

I recognize, however, that administrative law judges can be effective in complex adjudicative matters, as evidenced in other state agencies. Therefore, I am directing the Secretary of the Environmental Protection Agency to evaluate the potential role for administrative law judges and provide a recommendation on improvements to the Board's hearing process by January 1, 2018.

Sincerely,



Edmund G. Brown Jr.