| Type of Measure |
|---|
| Inactive Bill - Vetoed |
| Majority Vote Required |
| Non-Appropriation |
| Fiscal Committee |
| Non-State-Mandated Local Program |
| Non-Urgency |
| Non-Tax levy |
| Last 5 History Actions | |
|---|---|
| Date | Action |
| 10/07/11 | Vetoed by Governor. |
| 09/21/11 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m. |
| 09/09/11 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 62. Noes 14. Page 3197.). |
| 09/09/11 | From committee: That the Senate amendments be concurred in. (Ayes 7. Noes 0.) (September 9). |
| 09/09/11 | Joint Rule 62(a), file notice suspended. (Ayes 50. Noes 26. Page 3172.) |
| Governor's Message |
|---|
| To the Members of the California State Assembly: I am sympathetic to the author's concerns that voters should understand more clearly the consequences of initiatives that dedicate revenue to a specific purpose. But the rote disclaimer mandated by this bill won't provide voters greater clarity. I am returning Assembly Bill 65 without my signature. Sincerely, Edmund G. Brown Jr. |