Status


Add To My Favorites | print page

AB-2389 Contractor disclosure requirements.(2011-2012)

Senate
Assembly
Int
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto
Senate
Assembly
Int
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto

Bill Status
AB-2389
Bonnie Lowenthal (A)
-
-
Contractor disclosure requirements.
03/27/12
An act to add Title 18 (commencing with Section 3273) to Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, relating to contractor disclosure requirements.
Assembly
09/06/12
08/16/12

Type of Measure
Inactive Bill - Vetoed
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Non-Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
09/30/12 Vetoed by Governor.
09/10/12 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 5:10 p.m.
08/28/12 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 51. Noes 28. Page 6417.).
08/27/12 Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Page 6357.)
08/24/12 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 28 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
Governor's Message
To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 2389 without my signature.

This is a bill that ultimately is about the growing practice of subcontracting in the service industry. I agree that this is a topic that requires greater scrutiny - and more detailed information.

It is not clear to me that requiring logos on uniforms and vehicles solves any problems, but it may spawn confusion and some costs. I think we need to know more before prescribing practices such as those suggested by this bill.

Sincerely,



Edmund G. Brown Jr.