13978.9.
(a) For purposes of this section, the following definitions apply:(1) “Commission” means the Metropolitan Transportation Commission.
(2) “Consolidation” means a reform to transit agencies that includes one or more of the following:
(A) Combining staffs or back office functions of two or more transit agencies while retaining separate governing boards.
(B) Replacing multiple governing boards with a unified governing board representing a broader jurisdiction.
(C) Creating a more effective umbrella structure under which existing transit agencies are brought together but still operate as distinct agencies with separate governing boards.
(3) “Enhanced coordination” means increasing coordination across two or more transit agencies to improve service, efficiency, safety, or other benefits. Enhanced coordination may include, but is not limited to, any of the following:
(A) Colocation of facilities, programs, or services.
(B) Collaborating on grant applications, state or local plans, or both, training, vehicle purchasing, or maintenance.
(C) Federal fund braiding.
(D) Initiatives included in the 2021 Bay Area Transit Transformation Action Plan or any successor plan adopted by the commission.
(4) “Labor institute” means the University of California, Berkeley Labor Center or the UCLA Labor Center.
(5) “San Francisco Bay area” means the region comprising the commission’s jurisdiction, as prescribed by Section 66502.
(6) “Transit agency” has the same meaning as “public transportation operator” as defined in subdivision (b) of Section 99312.2 of the Public Utilities Code.
(7) “Transportation institute” means either the University of California Institute of
Transportation Studies or the Mineta Transportation Institute at San José State University.
(b) The Transportation Agency shall oversee the completion of the assessment required pursuant to subdivision (c) and the report of legislative recommendations required pursuant to subdivision (d) in a manner that emphasizes, across all facets of analysis and recommendations, benefits to riders and disabled riders, including those who use paratransit. The completion of the assessment and report shall include consultation with impacted stakeholders including, but not limited to, impacted transit agencies, transit unions, transit riders, and local governments. It is the intent of the Legislature that the assessment and the report help achieve all of the following goals with regard to the operation of public transit in the San Francisco Bay area:
(1) Improving the speed, efficiency, and reliability of service.
(2) Improving the affordability of fares.
(3) Improving the safety and cleanliness of service.
(4) Promoting the achievement of the state’s climate goals, including through the incorporation and diffusion of zero-emission technologies.
(5) Incorporating other technological changes that improve rider experience and safety.
(6) Improving accessibility of, and connections to, regional and interregional transit service in a manner that competes with private automobile travel,
particularly for low-income residents and those residing in equity priority communities, as defined by the commission.
(7) Improving and simplifying the accountability of the transportation systems to the public and riders.
(8) Reducing administrative costs and improving cost efficiencies within and across transit agencies.
(c) (1) The Transportation Agency shall select a transportation institute to conduct an assessment in accordance with the requirements of this section. The transportation institute shall consult with a labor institute, if it chooses to participate, in conducting all aspects of the assessment with respect to impacts on the workforce and labor relations. The transportation institute shall
complete the assessment on or before January 1, 2026, and upon completion, shall submit the assessment to the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795, and to the commission and each of the transit agencies located in the San Francisco Bay area.
(2) The transportation institute shall identify each transit agency that has authority to create policy or assess charges with regard to transit and that is located in the San Francisco Bay area and, at a minimum, all of the following information in the assessment:
(A) The county where each transit agency and its governing body is located.
(B) The governance structure of each transit agency, including all of the following information:
(i) The size of the membership, terms of service of the members, and whether the members are voting members, and whether the governing body of those agencies is appointed or elected.
(ii) Any qualifications required to serve as a member of the governing board of the transit agency.
(iii) Whether the governing body of the transit agency was created pursuant to state law, local ordinance, city charter, federal law, or ballot measure or initiative.
(C) The funding structures, including any tax assessments, and revenue mechanisms, including any temporary or permanent state or federal support, or both, established for each transit agency.
(D) The fares or other
fees imposed on riders by each transit agency and the available routes provided by each transit agency.
(E) The fleet type and size of each transit agency.
(F) The programs and services offered to riders by each transit agency, including any subsidies or discounts offered to riders.
(G) The workforce size and type of each transit agency, whether there are any applicable labor contracts for that workforce, and the socioeconomic makeup of that workforce.
(H) The socioeconomic makeup of the riders of each transit agency.
(I) The number and rate of transfers between public transit services operated by
different agencies.
(J) An analysis of existing transit service gaps compared to regional travel patterns and how it relates to transit agencies’ boundaries.
(3) The assessment shall analyze the benefits and disbenefits to riders, and the administrative, financial, legal, contractual, and governance feasibility, of various forms of consolidation and enhanced coordination among transit agencies that are located within the San Francisco Bay area.
(4) The assessment shall consider all of the following:
(A) The impacts of consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, on all of the following:
(i) Wages, work conditions, and pension and retirement benefits of workers covered by collective bargaining agreements at relevant agencies and contracted services.
(ii) Operating budgets.
(iii) Existing costs.
(iv) Costs associated with implementation.
(v) Governance.
(vi) The total number of people employed and employment opportunities.
(B) Challenges associated with any form of consolidation or enhanced coordination, including consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, of transit agencies with different service modes,
rolling stock, and technologies, and with other key operational differences across agencies.
(C) Regulatory and legal barriers to any form of consolidation or enhanced coordination.
(D) Existing and planned regional network management efforts, including efforts to modify and improve the commission’s regional network management authority, and how consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, would relate to, or impact, those efforts.
(5) If the Transportation Agency selects the University of California Institute of Transportation Studies to conduct the assessment, the requirement to conduct the assessment shall only apply to the University of California to the extent that the Regents of the University of California, by
appropriate resolution, make that requirement applicable.
(d) (1) Based on the findings of the assessment conducted pursuant to subdivision (c), the Transportation Agency shall develop a report of recommendations to the Legislature. The Transportation Agency shall complete the report on or before January 1, 2027, and, upon completion, shall submit the report to the Legislature in compliance with Section 9795, and to the commission and each of the transit agencies located in the San Francisco Bay area. In the report, the Transportation Agency shall do all of the following:
(A) Identify opportunities for the consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, of two or more agencies and provide specific recommendations for the consolidation or enhanced
coordination, or both, of transit agencies and their governing bodies without resulting in the elimination of programs and transportation services, with consideration for existing and planned regional network management efforts or structures.
(B) Identify steps to maintain and transfer labor agreements and bargaining units to maintain employee wages, benefits, protections, and working conditions secured by those agreements.
(C) Identify barriers to the consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, of transit agencies, including local, state, or federal laws, and alternative actions to the consolidation or
enhanced coordination, or both.
(D) Recommend opportunities for securing federal, state, and local moneys that can be used to fund consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both.
(E) Recommend a strategy for a public education and outreach program on any proposed consolidation or enhanced coordination efforts, or both.
(2) If the Transportation Agency recommends a new governing structure and governing board member qualifications, as appropriate, for a new consolidated agency or agencies, the Transportation Agency shall base that recommendation on research of effective international models of transit delivery excellence, and consideration of recent regional and state studies of effective transit
governance. In making a recommendation described in this paragraph, the Transportation Agency shall do all of the following:
(A) Identify any future legislative steps required to implement the recommended governing structure.
(B) Consider other reforms necessary to ensure that commission policy is democratically accountable and serves the regional welfare.
(C) Assess any impact that consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, would have on wages, work conditions, and pension and retirement benefits of workers covered by collective bargaining agreements at the relevant transit agencies, including paratransit and other contracted services.
(3) The
Transportation Agency may contract with a consultant to complete the report required pursuant to this subdivision if the Transportation Agency does both of the following:
(A) Establishes a team to advise the consultant that, at minimum, includes a transportation institute and a labor institute, if they choose to participate, and that may additionally include, as needed, individuals with expertise in the legal, governance, financial, and operational aspects of public transportation in the state.
(B) Oversees the consultant consistent with subdivision (b).
(e) (1) The Bay Area Transit Consolidation and Coordination Technical Assistance Fund is hereby established in the State Treasury for the deposit of
moneys that can be used for the following purposes:
(A) Paying for the cost of conducting the assessment pursuant to subdivision (c) and preparing the report pursuant to subdivision (d).
(B) Paying for administrative expenses related to the implementation of the consolidation or enhanced coordination, or both, of transit agencies located in the San Francisco Bay area, if those consolidations or enhanced coordinations occur.
(2) Any moneys deposited into the fund, including moneys deposited into the fund pursuant to Section 66538.40, shall be available to the Transportation Agency, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for the purposes described in paragraph (1).
(3) The Transportation Agency may accept private donations to be used for the purposes described in this section. Any donations received pursuant to this paragraph shall be deposited into the fund established pursuant to paragraph (1).