SEC. 2.
(a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(1) Despite efforts to ensure youth exit California’s child welfare system to family and other permanent connections, nearly 4,600 youth find themselves alone each year, often facing extreme housing precarity, according to the University of California, Berkeley’s California Child Welfare Indicators Project.
(2) One-quarter of former foster youth experienced homelessness in California between the ages of 21 and 23, inclusive, with an additional 28 percent reporting that they had “couch surfed,” according to
seminal research. Of unsheltered adults identified in the 2022 Greater Los Angeles Homeless Count alone, 35 percent had experienced the foster care or juvenile justice systems, a total of 15,612 individuals.
(3) Between the ages of 18 and 25, inclusive, young people in and exiting the foster care system have a myriad of benefits and housing subsidies. In 2008, Congress passed the Fostering Connections to Success and Increasing Adoptions Act (H.R. 693). The law offered states matching federal Title IV-E entitlement dollars to extend foster care through the age of 21.
(4) In 2010, California passed the California Fostering Connections to Success Act (Chapter 229 of the Statues of 2010) to extend foster care in the state, and has since drawn down many millions of dollars to
support foster youth success.
(5) Alongside an array of transitional housing programs administered by the State Department of Social Services, youth who have experienced foster care have a network of housing opportunities, albeit frayed and insufficient to forestall the dire housing precarity they face.
(6) The need is to create more housing on a dramatic scale for this, a population to whom the state and every Californian has a deep responsibility.
(7) A key problem with most of the rental subsidies current and former foster youth receive is that they are portable, akin to tenant-based Housing Choice Vouchers administered by the federal Department of Housing and Urban Development.
(8) The federal Transportation Infrastructure Finance and Innovation Act of 1998 (P.L. 105-178) provided loan guarantees, low-interest financing, and lines of credit for major infrastructure projects. This strategy drew billions in private investment to build
roads, bridges, and tunnels.
(9)Similarly, the Community Investment Guarantee Pool (CIGP), launched in 2019, has pulled together major names in philanthropy and impact investing, including, among others, the Chan Zuckerberg Initiative, Arnold Ventures, the Annie E. Casey and Kresge foundations, to offer loan guarantees for a range of socially conscious private enterprises. In 2021, the CIGP used $15,000,000 in guarantees to leverage $131,000,000 in capital to develop affordable housing.
(10)The solution for foster youth is the stable, predictable, and affordable housing they need to find
their footing and success. The state needs to create an unfunded loan guarantee pool, administered by the California Infrastructure and Economic Development Bank (IBank), to spur private debt financing to develop housing for current and former foster youth. In conjunction with existing rental
subsidies this strategy portends a dramatic ramp-up in housing for this particularly vulnerable population.
(b) It is the intent of the Legislature to help end the foster care-to-homelessness pipeline by providing loan guarantees for the development and acquisition of housing for the more than 4,600 youth who exit California’s child welfare system every year.