SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Until January 1, 2013, California had a California Recreational Trails Committee.
(b) Due in large part to the COVID-19 pandemic and the fundamental human need to interact with people and nature, the popularity of California’s nonmotorized natural surface recreation trails exploded over the past two years.
(c) Nonmotorized recreation trails are the venues of choice for diverse outdoor activities, including hiking, mountain and gravel biking, trail running,
equestrian use, and passive nature experience.
(d) According to the Outdoor Industry Association, trail activities are the most popular form of outdoor engagement in the country, yet California spends less than $3 million per year on nonmotorized natural surface trail enhancements through federally funded programs.
(e) Several strategy documents produced by Governor Gavin Newsom’s administration to combat climate change and promote resilient landscapes, including the “Pathways to 30x30” draft document, which emphasizes the need for sustainable and equitable recreation and trail investments, will help to facilitate this objective.
(f) In an effort to combat wildfire through the joint management of lands, California and the
United States Forest Service entered into the “Agreement for Shared Stewardship of California’s Forests and Rangelands” wherein this agreement calls for a shared vision around access and diversity that includes “increasing accessible trails and targeting low-income communities that lack access.”
(g) To further promote the multibenefit element of climate and resiliency investments, California should further explore opportunities that feature the incorporation of new trails and trail corridors in future risk reduction buffers and shaded fuel break projects.
(h) According to the Outdoor Industry Association, California’s outdoor economy is one of the state’s primary economic drivers, contributing nearly $100 billion annually in goods and services to the financial health of the
state, and trail infrastructure is a critical component to this sector’s level of success.
(i) Through the enactment of Proposition 68, as approved at the June 5, 2018, statewide direct primary election, and the 2021–22 state budget, California has seen an infusion of resources for nature-based investments to accelerate the pace and scale of climate resiliency and public access projects.
(j) While the state has recently made a substantial commitment to outdoor programming, this investment is incongruous with the level of investment in trails infrastructure, which are the primary means to connect people and programs to nature, and California needs to establish a sustainable state-specific funding source to keep up with trail demand.
(k) To underscore the demand for funding in this area, during a recent grant cycle to secure awards relating to trails and greenway corridors, there were more than $300 million in funding requests but there was only $27 million available pursuant to Proposition 68, as approved at the June 5, 2018, statewide direct primary election.