(1) Existing law establishes a public school financing system that requires state funding for county superintendents of schools, school districts, and charter schools to be calculated pursuant to a local control funding formula, as specified. Existing law requires, for the 2013–14 fiscal year and for each fiscal year thereafter, the Superintendent of Public Instruction to annually calculate a county local control funding formula for each county superintendent of schools, as provided.
This bill, commencing with the 2017–18 fiscal year, would require the Superintendent to add a specified amount to the annual apportionment to each county superintendent of schools as part of the county local control funding formula, as provided. The bill, commencing with the 2018–19 fiscal year, would require that amount to be adjusted by a
specified cost-of-living adjustment.
(2) The Child Care and Development Services Act, administered by the State Department of Education, requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to administer child care and development programs that offer a full range of services to eligible children from infancy to 13 years of age. The act requires the department to contract with local contracting agencies to provide for alternative payment programs, and authorizes alternative payments to be made for child care services, as provided. The act requires families to meet specified requirements to be eligible for federal and state subsidized child development services. The act authorizes the Superintendent to enter into and execute local contractual agreements with any public or private entity or agency for the delivery of child care and development services.
The act requires the
Superintendent to administer all California state preschool programs and provides that 3- and 4-year-old children are eligible for the part-day California state preschool program if the family meets specified criteria.
This bill would update the definition of a homeless child or youth for these purposes. The bill would authorize alternative payment programs and providers operating or providing child care services pursuant to these programs, and contractors operating or providing child care and development services, to use digital forms to allow families to apply for services, as provided. The bill would authorize a part-day California state preschool program, after all otherwise eligible children have been enrolled, to provide services to 3- and 4-year-old children in families whose income is above a certain income eligibility threshold if those children have been identified as “children with exceptional needs,” as defined.
(3) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to adopt rules and regulations on eligibility, enrollment, and priority of services needed to implement the Child Care and Development Services Act. The act, and regulations adopted pursuant to the act, set forth eligibility requirements for families to receive federal and state subsidized child development services, including income eligibility requirements, and impose various time limits for receipt of services and recertification for continued services.
This bill would provide that a family, upon establishing initial eligibility or ongoing eligibility for services under the act, shall be considered to meet all eligibility and need requirements for those services for not less than 12 months, shall receive those services for not less than 12 months before having their eligibility or need recertified, and shall not be required to report
changes to income or other changes for at least 12 months, except as provided. The bill would require the State Department of Education to implement this provision through management bulletins or similar letters of instruction on or before October 1, 2017, until regulations are filed with the Secretary of State to implement the provision. The bill would require the department to initiate a rulemaking action to implement the provision on or before December 31, 2018. The bill would require the department to convene a workgroup of parents, advocates, department staff, child development program representatives, and other stakeholders to develop recommendations regarding implementing the provision.
The bill would revise the definition of “income eligible” for purposes of establishing initial income eligibility for services under the act, and would add a definition of “ongoing income eligible” for purposes of establishing ongoing income eligibility for services under the
act. The bill would require income eligibility and ongoing income eligibility calculations to be adjusted for family size, as provided. The bill would require the Department of Finance to calculate the state median income for various family sizes for this purpose, as provided, and to update those calculations and provide them to the State Department of Education no later than May 1 of each fiscal year.
The bill would, except as provided, prohibit a payment made by a child development program for a child, during the period between a family’s most recent eligibility certification or recertification and its next eligibility recertification, from being considered an error or an improper payment due to a change in the family’s circumstances during that same period.
The bill would repeal certain time limits on the receipt of services under the act and an authorization for the Superintendent to grant an extension of services, as
specified.
(4) The Child Care and Development Services Act requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to implement a plan that establishes reasonable standards and assigned reimbursement rates for child care services, as provided. Existing law provides that the standard reimbursement rate for a 250-day year is $9,572.50 per unit of average daily enrollment, and the full-day state preschool reimbursement rate for a 250-day year is $9,632.50 per unit of average daily enrollment. Existing law makes those rates effective only until December 31, 2016, and, commencing January 1, 2017, increases those rates to $10,529.75 and $10,595.75, respectively.
This bill would, commencing July 1, 2017, make the standard reimbursement rate $11,360.00 and would make the full-day state preschool reimbursement rate $11,432.50. The bill would, commencing with the 2018–19 fiscal year, require these
reimbursement rates to be increased by a specified cost-of-living adjustment.
(5) Existing law requires the cost of child care services provided to recipients of the California Work Opportunity and Responsibility to Kids (CalWORKs) program under specified law to be governed by regional market rates. Existing law requires the regional market rate ceilings to be established at the greater of 2 figures from January 1, 2017, until June 30, 2018, and at the 75th percentile of the 2014 regional market rate survey for that region commencing July 1, 2018.
This bill would instead require, commencing January 1, 2017, and until December 31, 2017, the regional market rate ceilings to be established at the greater of those 2 figures. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2018, and until December 31, 2018, the regional market rate ceilings to be established at the 75th percentile of the
2016 regional market rate survey for that region or at the regional market rate ceiling that existed in that region on December 31, 2017, whichever is greater. The bill would require, commencing January 1, 2019, the regional market rate ceilings to be established at the 75th percentile of the 2016 regional market rate survey for that region.
(6) Existing law establishes the K–12 High-Speed Network (K–12 HSN) to, among other things, provide high-speed, high-bandwidth Internet connectivity to the public school system. Existing law provides for the administration of the K–12 HSN by a lead education agency selected by the Superintendent of Public Instruction, and requires the lead education agency to, among other things, develop an annual budget request for K–12 HSN for submission to the State Department of Education and the Department of Finance to be included in the annual Budget Act.
This bill would
instead require the lead education agency to develop an annual budget request for K–12 HSN to be considered for the annual Budget Act. The bill would require the lead education agency, before expending any funds for planned network upgrade projects that exceed $25,000 in cost, to develop a methodology to determine and prioritize planned network upgrade projects, as specified, and, commencing with the 2017–18 fiscal year and in each fiscal year thereafter, to utilize that methodology for planned network upgrade projects that exceed $25,000 in cost. The bill would authorize the Superintendent to request data and other programmatic information from the lead education agency as needed to oversee the program.
(7) Existing law establishes the Career Technical Education Facilities Program to provide funding for qualified local educational agencies for purposes of constructing new facilities or reconfiguring existing facilities for career technical
education, as specified. Existing law prohibits the State Allocation Board from approving any projects pursuant to the program on and after January 1, 2015.
This bill would repeal that prohibition.
(8) Existing law requires, whenever moneys transferred to the General Fund each year from moneys deposited into the Public School Building Loan Fund and the State School Building Aid Fund exceed the amounts required to reimburse the General Fund on account of principal and interest due and payable for that fiscal year on all school building aid bonds outstanding against the state, an amount equal to the excess to be appropriated from the General Fund for purposes of the School Facilities Emergency Repair Account.
This bill would make these provisions inoperative on July 1, 2018, and would repeal them as of
January 1, 2019.
(9) Existing law requires any funds in the State School Site Utilization Fund, including interest, that are not subject to return to a school district, as specified, to be allocated, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of administering the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998. Existing law requires any unencumbered funds in the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund on July 1, 2014, to be transferred to the State School Site Utilization Fund.
This bill would instead require any unencumbered funds in the State School Deferred Maintenance Fund after July 1, 2014, to be transferred to the State School Site Utilization Fund.
(10) Existing law establishes the School Facilities Emergency Repair Account in the State Treasury, and requires the State Allocation Board to
administer the account. Existing law establishes the Proposition 98 Reversion Account in the General Fund, and requires that the Legislature, from time to time, transfer into this account moneys previously appropriated in satisfaction of the constitutional minimum funding requirements that have not been disbursed or otherwise encumbered for the purposes for which they were appropriated.
This bill would require any unencumbered balance available in the School Facilities Emergency Repair Account after July 1, 2018, to revert to the Proposition 98 Reversion Account.
(11) Existing law authorizes a school district offering kindergarten to maintain kindergarten classes at different schoolsites within the school district for different lengths of time during the schoolday.
This bill would instead authorize a school district to maintain
kindergarten or transitional kindergarten classes for different lengths of time during the schoolday, either at the same or a different schoolsite.
(12) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to develop or approve courses for training school pupil activity bus, transit bus, schoolbus, and farm labor vehicle drivers, as provided. Existing law requires the department to train or approve the necessary instructional personnel to conduct the driver training courses. Existing law authorizes the department to assess fees to any instructor applicant who will be training drivers of a transit bus.
This bill would also authorize the department to assess fees to any instructor applicant who will be training drivers of a farm labor vehicle, schoolbus, or school pupil activity bus.
(13) Existing law requires the Controller, in
consultation with the Department of Finance and the State Department of Education, to develop a plan to review and report on financial and compliance audits of school districts and the offices of county superintendents of schools, and to propose the content of an audit guide that is required to be submitted by the Controller to the Education Audit Appeals Panel for review and possible amendment.
This bill would require, commencing April 1, 2017, a local educational agency that receives any of specified funds relating to school facilities projects to annually report a detailed list of all expenditures of state funds, including interest, and of the local educational agency’s matching funds for completed projects until all state funds, including interest, all of the local educational agency’s matching funds, and savings achieved, including interest, are expended in accordance with specified requirements. The bill would require the Controller, commencing with audits of
the 2018–19 fiscal year, to include instructions in the audit guide that include certain procedures for conducting the audit.
(14) Existing law requires, for the 1990–91 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, that moneys to be applied by the state for the support of school districts, community college districts, and direct elementary and secondary level instructional services provided by the state be distributed in accordance with certain calculations governing the proration of those moneys among the 3 segments of public education. Existing law makes that provision inapplicable to the 1992–93 to 2016–17 fiscal years, inclusive.
This bill would also make that provision inapplicable to the 2017–18 fiscal year.
(15) Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution sets forth a formula for computing the minimum amount of revenues
that the state is required to appropriate for the support of school districts and community college districts for each fiscal year.
This bill would appropriate $89,637,000 from the General Fund to the Controller for allocation to school districts and community college districts for the purpose of reducing the 2009–10 fiscal year outstanding balance of the minimum funding obligation to school districts and community college districts, as specified. The bill would also require that, if the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the Director of Finance jointly determine that, for the 2016–17 fiscal year, the state has applied moneys for the support of school districts and community college districts that exceed the minimum funding obligation for that year, the excess, up to a specified amount, of the moneys shall be deemed a payment in satisfaction of the 2009–10 fiscal year outstanding balance of the minimum funding obligation.
Existing law requires a supplemental appropriation to be made from the General Fund for the support of school districts and community college districts in any fiscal year in which a specified formula is applied to meet the minimum funding obligation required by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, as provided.
This bill would suspend the supplemental appropriation for the 2016–17 fiscal year to the 2020–21 fiscal year, inclusive.
(16) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district that maintains a junior high school or high school to schedule classes so that each pupil attends classes for at least 1,200 minutes during any 5-schoolday period or 2,400 minutes during any 10-schoolday period.
This bill would also authorize the governing board of a school district
that maintains an early college high school or middle college high school to schedule classes so that each pupil who satisfies the applicable attendance requirements for early college high school and middle college high school attends classes for at least 900 minutes during any 5-schoolday period or 1,800 minutes during any 10-schoolday period.
(17) Existing law establishes the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence to advise and assist school districts, county superintendents of schools, and charter schools in achieving their local control and accountability plan goals, and requires individuals and entities contracted by the collaborative for those purposes to have expertise, experience, and a record of success in certain areas. Existing law authorizes the Superintendent of Public Instruction, at the request of the chartering authority and with the approval of the State Board of Education, to assign the collaborative to provide
advice and assistance to a charter school that, for 3 out of 4 consecutive school years, fails to improve pupil outcomes for one or more priorities identified in the school’s charter.
This bill would instead authorize the collaborative, at the request of the chartering authority, and after consulting with the Superintendent and with the approval of the state board, to provide advice and assistance to such a charter school.
Existing law requires the Superintendent, with the approval of the state board, to contract with a local educational agency, or consortium of local educational agencies, to serve as the fiscal agent of the collaborative. Existing law requires, at the direction of the governing board of the collaborative, the fiscal agent to contract with individuals, local educational agencies, or organizations with the expertise, experience, and a record of success to carry out the purposes of these provisions described
above.
This bill would instead require the governing board of the collaborative, with the approval of the Department of Finance, to contract with a local educational agency, or consortium of local educational agencies, to serve as the fiscal agent of the collaborative. The bill would provide that the individuals with whom the fiscal agent enters into employment contracts at the direction of the governing board of the collaborative to carry out the purposes of these provisions are required to be deemed employees of the fiscal agent and eligible for participation in either the State Teachers’ Retirement System or the Public Employees’ Retirement System, as appropriate to the nature of the work to be performed by the employees.
(18) Existing law requires the California School Finance Authority to administer the Charter School Facility Grant Program, and provides that the grant program is intended to
provide assistance with facilities rent and lease costs for pupils in charter schools. Existing law requires eligible charter schools to receive an amount of up to, but not more than, $750 per unit of average daily attendance to provide an amount of up to, but not more than, 75% of annual facilities rent and lease costs for the charter school.
This bill would instead require, commencing with the 2017–18 fiscal year, and subject to available funding in the annual Budget Act, eligible charter schools to receive the lesser of 75% of annual facilities rent and lease costs for the charter school or $1,117 per unit of average daily attendance in the 2017–18 fiscal year and subject to a specified adjustment in any fiscal year thereafter.
(19) Existing law requires a sponsoring local educational agency to annually transfer to each of its charter schools funding in lieu of property taxes,
as specified. Existing law requires the sponsoring local educational agency to transfer funding in lieu of property taxes to the charter school in monthly installments, as provided. Existing law requires final adjustments to the amount of funding in lieu of property taxes allocated to a charter school to be made in February, in conjunction with the final reconciliation of annual apportionments to schools. Existing law authorizes, for a pupil attending a county charter program school, as specified, for whom the county office of education is not educationally responsible, the county charter program school to seek in lieu property tax reimbursement from the pupil’s school district of residence, as provided.
This bill would instead require final adjustments to the amount of funding in lieu of property taxes allocated to a charter school to be made in June, in conjunction with the 3rd recertification of annual apportionments to schools. The bill would also delete the
provision authorizing, for a pupil attending a county charter program school for whom the county office of education is not educationally responsible, the county charter program school to seek in lieu property tax reimbursement from the pupil’s school district of residence.
(20) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to accept pupils from other school districts by adopting a resolution to become a school district of choice, as defined, in accordance with specified procedural requirements and limitations.
This bill would revise and recast these provisions. The bill would, among other things, expand the list of pupil characteristics that a school district of choice is prohibited from considering in selecting pupils for admission and would revise the requirements for admitting or rejecting and the manner of selecting pupils who apply to transfer to a school district of choice.
The bill would revise the procedural requirements for becoming a school district of choice, including requiring a school district to register as a school district of choice with both the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the county board of education. The bill would reduce the amount of funds to be apportioned for average daily attendance to school districts of choice under certain circumstances. The bill would delete a provision limiting transportation assistance that the school district of choice may provide to pupils enrolled in the school district of choice program to the boundaries of the school district of choice. The bill would revise data, information, and reporting requirements relating to the school district of choice program, including requiring the Superintendent to maintain a list of the school districts of choice in the state and to collect specified other information relating to school districts of choice, and by requiring the Superintendent rather than the Legislative Analyst to make
specified information available to the appropriate fiscal and policy committees of the Legislature and the Department of Finance each year. The bill would require the Legislative Analyst to conduct an evaluation of the school district of choice program and to make recommendations on specified matters to the appropriate education policy committees of the Legislature and the Department of Finance by January 31, 2021. The bill would require the State Department of Education to investigate complaints regarding schools operating as school districts of choice without being registered and for school districts of choice failing to report the required data, as specified, and would authorize the Superintendent to withhold a specified amount of the school district’s apportionment if the school district is accepting pupils through a school district of choice program without being registered or if the Superintendent finds that a school district of choice is not reporting the required data.
Existing law makes the school district of choice program inoperative on July 1, 2017.
This bill would instead make the program inoperative on July 1, 2023.
(21) Existing law sets the reimbursement a school receives for free and reduced-price meals sold or served to pupils in elementary, middle, or high schools at $0.2271 per meal, and for meals served in child care centers and homes at $0.1691 per meal.
This bill would increase the reimbursement rate for elementary, middle, and high schools to $0.2306 per meal and for meals served in child care centers and homes to $0.1717 per meal.
(22) Existing law requires the State Board of Education to appoint a Child Nutrition Advisory Council composed of 13 members, as specified, to recommend
plans and guidelines for school and child care meal service and nutrition education programs.
This bill would instead require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to appoint the members of the council.
(23) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, with the approval of the State Board of Education, to develop an Academic Performance Index (API), as specified, to measure the performance of schools and school districts. Existing law authorizes the Superintendent, with the approval of the state board, for the 2013–14, 2014–15, and 2015–16 school years only, to not provide an API score to a school or school district due to a determination by the Superintendent that a transition to new standards-based assessments would compromise comparability of results across schools or school districts.
This bill would extend that authorization to the
2016–17 school year as well.
(24) Existing law requires, on or before July 1, 2014, governing boards of school districts and county boards of education to adopt a local control and accountability plan using a state template adopted by the State Board of Education. Existing law requires, on or before March 31, 2014, the state board to adopt templates for these purposes. Existing law authorizes the state board to adopt the template in accordance with specified requirements relating to meetings, and makes that provision inoperative on January 31, 2018. Existing law requires revisions to a template or evaluation rubric to be approved by the state board by January 31 before the fiscal year during which the template or evaluation rubric is to be used by a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school.
This bill would extend the authorization for the state board to adopt the template in
accordance with the requirements relating to meetings until December 31, 2018. The bill would also authorize the state board to revise the template in accordance with those meetings requirements. The bill would no longer require revisions to an evaluation rubric to be approved by the state board by January 31 before the fiscal year during which the evaluation rubric is to be used.
This bill, for the 2017–18 fiscal year, would appropriate $400,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction for support and development of the Local Control and Accountability Plan Electronic Template system and the California School Dashboard mobile app, as provided.
(25) Existing law requires the governing board of a school district, not later than 5 days after adoption of a local control and accountability plan or annual update to a local control and accountability plan, to file the plan or annual
update to the plan with the county superintendent of schools. Existing law authorizes a complaint that a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school has not complied with the requirements relating to local control and accountability plans to be filed with a school district, county superintendent of schools, or charter school pursuant to specified procedures and authorizes an appeal of that complaint to the Superintendent of Public Instruction.
This bill, beginning with the 2018–19 fiscal year and in each fiscal year thereafter, would require a county superintendent of schools to prepare a summary of how it plans to support school districts and schools within the county in implementing local control and accountability plans and would require it to present the summary to the county board of education. To the extent that this bill would impose additional duties on county superintendents of schools, the bill would create a state-mandated local
program. If the Superintendent finds merit in an appeal of a complaint filed against a school district related to a local control and accountability plan approved by a county superintendent of schools or in an appeal against a county superintendent of schools related to the approval of a school district’s local control and accountability plan, the bill would require the Superintendent to provide technical assistance to the county superintendent of schools focused on improving the county superintendent of schools’ review and approval of local control and accountability plans.
(26) Existing law requires the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to, among other duties, establish standards for the issuance and renewal of credentials, certificates, and permits. Existing law requires the commission to issue an authorization for a teacher who meets specified requirements to provide instruction to English learners.
This bill would establish the Bilingual Teacher Professional Development Program and would require the State Department of Education to allocate grant funding to local educational agencies or a consortia of local educational agencies for purposes of providing professional development services to specified teachers and paraprofessionals to provide instruction to English learners. The bill would require the department to adopt criteria demonstrating a grant applicant’s ability to provide professional development services, as provided. The bill would require grant recipients to report specified information on the outcomes of the program to the department by January 1, 2021.
The bill would appropriate $5,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction to be available through the 2019–20 fiscal year for these purposes.
(27) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to convene, on or before September 1, 2017, a computer science strategic implementation advisory panel to develop recommendations for a computer science strategic implementation plan. Existing law requires the advisory panel to consist of various members, as provided. Existing law requires the Superintendent to appoint a statewide computer science liaison within the State Department of Education to serve the advisory panel, as provided. Existing law requires the department and the State Board of Education to consider the advisory panel’s recommendations, and requires the department to develop, and the state board to adopt, a computer science strategic implementation plan on or before January 1, 2019.
This bill would revise and recast these provisions. The bill would require the Superintendent to convene, on or before March 1, 2018, the computer science strategic implementation advisory
panel and would require the Governor, unless otherwise specified, to select its membership. The bill would repeal the provision requiring the Superintendent to appoint a statewide computer science liaison within the department to serve the advisory panel. The bill would require the Superintendent to receive the advisory panel’s recommendations, and would require the Superintendent to develop, and the state board to consider adopting, a computer science strategic implementation plan on or before July 15, 2019.
(28) Existing law requires the State Department of Education, on or before July 1, 2018, to develop a manual providing guidance to local educational agencies on identifying, assessing, supporting, and reclassifying English learners who may qualify for special education services and pupils with disabilities who may be classified as English learners, as specified, with the goal of providing guidance, for voluntary use by local educational
agencies, charter schools, and the state special schools on evidence-based and promising practices for the identification, assessment, support, and reclassification of those pupils and to promote a collaborative approach among general education teachers, special education teachers, school administrators, paraprofessionals, other involved personnel, and parents in determining the most appropriate academic placements and services for these pupils.
This bill instead would require the department, on or before January 1, 2019, to develop a manual providing guidance to local educational agencies on identifying English learners as individuals with exceptional needs, classifying individuals with exceptional needs as English learners, supporting pupils who are both English learners and individuals with exceptional needs, and determining when such dually identified pupils should be either removed from classification as English learners or exited from special education.
(29) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, commencing with the 2004–05 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, to make certain calculations for, and the State Department of Education to apportion certain amounts to, special education local plan areas, as provided, with respect to children and youth residing in foster family homes, small family homes, foster family agencies, group homes, skilled nursing facilities, intermediate care facilities, and community care facilities. Existing law requires the department to calculate an out-of-home care funding amount for each special education local plan area, as provided, for each fiscal year.
This bill would require, for purposes of the 2017–18 fiscal year out-of-home care funding amount for group homes, foster family homes, small family homes, and foster family agencies, the Superintendent to use the data
received from the State Department of Social Services that was used for the funding for the 2016–17 fiscal year. The bill would also require the department to adjust rates for payments to and from the resulting special education local plan areas, as provided, if those special education local plan areas reorganize, including by merger or division.
(30) Existing law requires the State Board of Education to adopt basic instructional materials for use in kindergarten and grades 1 to 8, inclusive, for governing boards of school districts, as provided. Existing law imposes various requirements on the State Department of Education and the state board for purposes of conducting an adoption of basic instructional materials for mathematics, as provided, and for purposes of conducting an adoption of basic instructional materials that are aligned to specified language arts content standards and specified English language development standards.
This bill would repeal the latter provisions. The bill would, among other things, require the department, before conducting an adoption in a given subject area, to provide notice, as specified, to all publishers or manufacturers, and would require each publisher or manufacturer choosing to participate in the adoption process to pay a fee, as specified, to offset the cost of conducting the adoption process.
(31) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to develop, and the Superintendent of Public Instruction and the State Board of Education to approve, contracts in connection with the California Assessment of Student Performance and Progress. Existing law requires the contracts to include provisions for progress payments to the contractor, as provided. Existing law requires not less than 10% of the amount budgeted for each separate and distinct component task
provided for in each contract to be withheld pending final completion of all component tasks by that contractor and prohibits the total amount withheld pending final completion from exceeding 10% of the total contract price for that fiscal year. Existing law provides that the contracts shall require liquidated damages to be paid by the contractor in the amount of up to 10% of the total cost of the contract for any component task that the contractor through its own fault or that of its subcontractors fails to substantially perform by the date specified in the agreement.
This bill would instead require not less than 10% of the amount budgeted for each separate and distinct component task per test administration provided for in each contract to be withheld pending final completion of all component tasks by that contractor and would prohibit the total amount withheld pending final completion from exceeding 10% of the total contract price for that test administration.
The bill would provide that the contracts shall require liquidated damages to be paid by the contractor in the amount of up to 10% of the total cost of the contract for any component task per test administration that the contractor through its own fault or that of its subcontractors fails to substantially perform as specified in the agreement.
(32) Existing law requires certain funds appropriated in the annual Budget Act for reimbursement for the cost of a new program or increased level of service of an existing program mandated by statute or executive order to be available as a block grant to school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education, to support specified state-mandated local programs. Existing law provides that a school district, charter school, or county office of education that submits a letter requesting funding to the Superintendent of Public Instruction and receives this block grant funding is not eligible to
submit a claim for reimbursement for those specified mandated programs for the fiscal year in which the block grant funding is received.
This bill would revise the list of programs that are authorized for block grant funding in lieu of program-specific reimbursement, as specified. The bill would require those block grant funds, commencing with the 2017–18 fiscal year, to be adjusted annually, as specified, according to the change in the Implicit Price Deflator for State and Local Government Purchases of Goods and Services, as published by the United States Department of Commerce.
(33) This bill would appropriate $876,581,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education for allocation by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to school districts and county superintendents of schools, as specified. The bill would require the funds to first satisfy any outstanding
claims for reimbursement of state-mandated local program costs for any fiscal year, but would authorize the governing boards of school districts to expend these one-time funds for any purpose.
(34) Existing law requires the State Department of Social Services to establish a registry of child care providers who have undergone criminal background checks called the trustline registry. Existing law requires the department to enter into a contract with the California Child Care Resource and Referral Network to administer its trustline duties and generally authorizes the department to enter into an interagency agreement for the purpose of transferring funds to offset the costs incurred by the California Child Care Resource and Referral Network to implement the trustline program.
This bill would additionally require the State Department of Education to enter into a contract with the California Child Care
Resource and Referral Network to administer trustline duties. The bill would exempt any contract or grant awarded pursuant to provisions related to the trustline program from personal services contracting requirements, requirements of the Public Contract Code, and the State Contracting Manual, and would no longer subject those contracts or grants to the approval of the Department of General Services.
(35) The California Child Day Care Facilities Act provides for the licensure and regulation of child day care facilities, day care centers, and family day care homes. The act exempts from its provisions certain types of these facilities, including, among others, a crisis nursery and extended day care programs operated by public or private schools. A violation of the act is a crime.
This bill would, commencing July 1, 2018, exempt from the provisions of the act a California state preschool program, as
defined, that meets specified conditions and operates in a school building, as defined, under contract through a local educational agency. The bill would require, no later than October 1, 2017, the Legislative Analyst to convene a stakeholder process for the purpose of ensuring state preschools operated by local educational agencies are maintaining all existing necessary health and safety requirements.
(36) The California Clean Energy Jobs Act, an initiative approved by the voters as Proposition 39 at the November 6, 2012, statewide general election, made changes to corporate income taxes and, except as specified, provides for the transfer of $550,000,000 annually from the General Fund to the Clean Energy Job Creation Fund, or the Job Creation Fund, for 5 fiscal years beginning with the 2013–14 fiscal year. Moneys in the Job Creation Fund are available, upon appropriation by the Legislature, for purposes of funding eligible projects that create
jobs in California improving energy efficiency and expanding clean energy generation. Existing law provides for the allocation of available funds to local educational agencies and community college districts. Existing law requires a local educational agency to encumber funds received for these purposes by June 30, 2018.
This bill would instead require a local educational agency to encumber funds received for these purposes by June 30, 2019. By extending the date of encumbrance of an existing appropriation, the bill would make an appropriation.
(37) Existing law establishes the California Career Technical Education Incentive Grant Program as a state education, economic, and workforce development initiative with the goal of providing pupils in kindergarten and grades 1 to 12, inclusive, with the knowledge and skills necessary to transition to employment and postsecondary education. Existing law
appropriates $200,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education for purposes of this grant program for the 2017–18 fiscal year. Existing law requires that appropriation to be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts, imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution, for the 2017–18 fiscal year.
This bill would delete the provision applying the $200,000,000 appropriation for the grant program toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts for the 2017–18 fiscal year.
(38) Existing law requires the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to, among other things, establish professional standards, assessments, and examinations for entry and advancement in the education profession and to establish standards for the issuance and renewal of
credentials, certificates, and permits. Existing law establishes the California Center on Teaching Careers for the purpose of recruiting qualified and capable individuals into the teaching profession, as provided.
This bill would establish the California Educator Development (CalED) Program to enhance the state’s efforts to address teacher recruitment and retention issues throughout the state by assisting local educational agencies with attracting and supporting the preparation and continued learning of teachers, principals, and other school leaders. The bill would require the commission, in conjunction with the California Center on Teaching Careers, to develop a competitive grant program, as provided, and would require the California Center on Teaching Careers, in consultation with the commission, to issue a request for proposals to all school districts, charter schools, and county offices of education in the state to solicit applications for
the program. The bill would make these provisions contingent on an appropriation in the annual Budget Act or another statute.
(39) This bill would appropriate $1,362,383,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction to be allocated for the purpose of the annual local control funding formula transition adjustment for each school district and charter school.
(40) This bill would require an amount to be determined by the Director of Finance to be appropriated, on or before June 30, 2018, from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction in the event that the amount by which specified revenues distributed to local educational agencies for special education programs are less than the estimated amount reflected in the Budget Act of 2017. The bill would also require the Director of Finance to reduce the General Fund appropriation for these
programs by the amount that these revenues exceed the estimated amount.
(41) Existing law provides funding for various career technical education programs, including regional occupational centers and programs.
This bill would appropriate $4,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction for allocation to the Southern California Regional Occupational Center for instructional and operating costs for the 2017–18 fiscal year, and would condition the receipt of this money on the Southern California Regional Occupational Center submitting an operational plan containing specified information to the Department of Finance and the Legislative Analyst’s Office and providing annual updates, as specified.
(42) Existing law, the California Healthcare, Research, and Prevention Tobacco Tax Act of 2016, or
Proposition 56, which was approved by voters at the November 8, 2016, statewide general election, increases taxes imposed on distributors of cigarettes and tobacco products and allocates 15% of the revenue to the State Department of Education to be used for school programs to prevent and reduce the use of tobacco and nicotine products by young people, as provided.
This bill would require those funds described above to be allocated to support programs that prevent and reduce the use of tobacco and nicotine products by young people pursuant to other legislation enacted in the 2017–18 Regular Session that is consistent with Proposition 56, or, if no legislation is regarding the use of those funds is chaptered by October 15, 2017, the bill would require those funds to be allocated to the department to be used for school programs to prevent and reduce the use of tobacco and nicotine products by young people, as provided.
(43) Existing law sets forth the maximum ratios of administrative employees to each 100 teachers in the various types of school districts, and requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to determine the reduction in state support resulting from excess administrative employees, as provided.
This bill would exempt a school district with average daily attendance of more than 400,000 as of the 2016–17 second principal apportionment from any penalties calculated resulting from excess administrative employees for the 2016–17 and 2017–18 fiscal years.
(44) Existing law establishes the California Classified School Employee Teacher Credentialing Program for the purpose of recruiting classified school employees to participate in a program designed to encourage them to enroll in teacher training programs and to provide instructional service as
teachers in the public schools.
This bill would appropriate, for the 2017–18 fiscal year, $25,000,000 from the General Fund to the Commission on Teacher Credentialing to fund a second cohort for the California Classified School Employee Teacher Credentialing Program to be available through the 2021–22 fiscal year, as specified.
(45) This bill would appropriate, for the 2017–18 fiscal year, $10,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Social Services in order to provide additional services for refugee pupils by allocating funding to school districts impacted by significant numbers of refugee pupils and other eligible populations served by the federal Office of Refugee Resettlement based on the eligibility criteria and allocation methodology set forth for the federal Refugee School Impact program.
(46) This bill would
appropriate, for the 2017–18 fiscal year, $5,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction to allocate to the San Francisco Unified School District to contract with the California Historical Society, in partnership with the California History-Social Science Project, to create a free online open K-12 curriculum for History-Social Science, as specified, and would require that curriculum to be made available to teachers by July 1, 2019.
(47) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, by no later than July 1, 2017, to provide the Legislature with an evaluation of kindergarten program implementation in the state, including part-day and full-day kindergarten programs.
This bill would require the Legislative Analyst’s Office, no later than March 1, 2018, to submit a report to the Legislature proposing options for incentivizing full-day kindergarten programs,
including an option to provide differentiated funding rates for full-day and part-day kindergarten. The bill would require the Superintendent to make available to the Legislative Analyst’s Office all cost data it collected or analyzed pursuant to the kindergarten program implementation evaluation.
(48) Existing law requires the California Collaborative for Educational Excellence, commencing with the 2016–17 fiscal year, to establish a statewide process to provide specified professional development training to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools for the purpose of successfully utilizing the evaluation rubrics adopted by the State Board of Education. Existing law appropriates $24,000,000 from the General Fund to the State Department of Education for allocation by the Superintendent of Public Instruction to the Riverside County Office of Education to support the collaborative for purposes of the training described
above.
This bill would provide that, of the $24,000,000 that was appropriated, all funds not encumbered by the Riverside County Office of Education by July 1, 2017, are available for allocation by the Superintendent to the Marin County Office of Education to support the collaborative for the purposes described above, would provide that any of those funds encumbered by Riverside County Office of Education on July 1, 2017, but not spent as of December 31, 2017, are also available for allocation to the Marin County Office of Education for the same purposes. The bill would provide that the funds allocated to the Marin County Office of Education are available for encumbrance through the 2019–20 fiscal year.
(49) Existing law requires the State Department of Education to ensure that the nutrition levels of meals served to schoolage children pursuant to the federal National School Lunch Act be of the highest
quality and greatest nutritional value possible.
This bill would establish the California-Grown Fresh School Meals Grant Program as a one-time program for purposes of encouraging the purchase of California-grown food by schools and expanding the number of freshly prepared school meals offered within the state that use California-grown ingredients. The bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction to provide grants to school districts, county offices of education, and charter schools for these purposes. The bill would appropriate $1,500,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent for the 2017–18 fiscal year for purposes of the program.
This bill would authorize the donation of funds from public and private sources and would establish an account for these purposes. The bill would provide that these funds would be transferred to the General Fund if specified circumstances exist.
(50) This bill would appropriate $2,500,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction on a one-time basis to establish the California Equity Performance and Improvement Program to support and build capacity within local educational agencies and the State Department of Education to promote equity in California’s public schools. The bill would require the Superintendent to apportion those funds to at least 2 county offices of education to serve as designated lead agencies for the program. The bill would require the designated lead agencies to identify existing resources, professional development activities, and other efforts, as well as develop new resources and activities, designed to help local educational agencies take specified actions to promote pupil equity. The bill would require each designated lead agency to collaborate with the department to prepare information about how the designated lead agency used the funds
until the agency has fully expended the funds allocated for these purposes, and would require the Superintendent to prepare a report based on that information.
(51) This bill would make conforming and clarifying changes, delete obsolete provisions, correct and update cross-references, and make other nonsubstantive changes.
(52) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.
(53) Funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution.
(54) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as a bill providing for appropriations related to the Budget Bill.