SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) The coast of California is a vital and invaluable natural resource of statewide importance belonging to all the people, and its preservation and accessibility by current and future generations is of paramount concern to the residents of this state and nation.
(b) Burning nonrenewable fossil fuels that are extracted from California’s public lands and state tidelands contributes to global climate change and sea level rise, which threatens the state’s coastal natural resources, human, plant, and animal communities, public infrastructure, coastal tourism and recreational opportunities, and the state’s
fifty-billion-dollar ($50,000,000,000) coastal economy.
(c) Royalty revenue generated from leases authorizing the extraction of nonrenewable resources on the state’s trust lands should be prioritized for planning, minimizing, and mitigating the environmental impacts of those activities, including, but not limited to, sea level rise.
(d) Revenues generated from state tideland, oil, and gas leases were historically allocated for environmental projects and programs with a nexus to the extraction activities.
(e) Recent “King Tide” events, during which residents photographed the local consequences of extreme high tide events around the state, illustrate that California’s coastal communities are not prepared for the
coming “new normal” of rising sea levels, and that enhanced coastal planning and management of coastal resources and development continue to be of preeminent concern to the state.
(f) The current rate of global sea level rise calls for an urgent, coordinated, statewide initiative to actively plan for adaption and mitigation strategies to address the inevitable economic and environmental impacts of sea level rise in this state.
(g) In 2008, Executive Order S-13-08 called on state agencies to develop California’s first strategy to identify and prepare for expected climate impacts, and specifically called for statewide consistency in planning for sea level rise. It also directed the Natural Resources Agency to coordinate with local, regional, state, and federal public and private entities to develop a state Climate Adaptation Strategy.
(h) In 2009, the Natural Resources Agency issued the 2009 Climate Adaptation Strategy, which specifically called for state agencies to prepare sea level rise plans and encouraged the protection of existing critical ecosystems using a variety of factors and strategies including providing a natural shoreline, cost benefit analysis accounting for all public and private costs and benefits, and approaches that can be resilient over a range of sea level possibilities.
(i) Protection of coastal resources from sea level rise impacts can provide additional valuable public benefits including, but not limited to, flood protection, improved water quality, habitat for fish, shellfish, and wildlife, recreational opportunities, enhanced quality of life, and increased property values.
(d)
(j) California’s coastal management agencies, the California Coastal Commission, the San Francisco Bay Conservation and Development Commission, and the State Coastal Conservancy, have broad authority for protecting coastal resources, enhancing public access to and along the shoreline, and working in partnership with local governments in long-range land use planning, permitting, and projects.
(e)
(k) The State Lands Commission, Ocean Protection Council, and the Department of Fish and Wildlife have
constitutional and statutory obligations to protect natural resources on other coastal public lands while ensuring public access.
(f)Recent “King Tide” events, during which residents photographed the local consequences of extreme high tide events around the state, illustrate that California’s coastal communities are not prepared for the coming “new normal” of rising sea levels, and that enhanced coastal planning and management of coastal resources and development continue to be of preeminent concern to the state.
(g)The current rate of global sea level rise calls for an urgent, coordinated,
statewide initiative to actively plan for adaptation and mitigation strategies to address the inevitable economic and environmental impacts of sea level rise in this state.
(h)
(l) California has an existing “planning infrastructure” already in place to address sea level rise, coastal management, and associated planning and land use issues in the form of local coastal programs and the San Francisco Bay Plan.
(i)
(m) Maintaining
a strong state coastal management program, including comprehensive updates of existing planning documents, is the most efficient, cost-effective, and practical method for ensuring that statewide coastal management and climate change policies are locally implemented and that unplanned and costly ad hoc responses that risk more significant environmental and social harm are avoided.
(j)Revenues generated from state tideland, oil, and gas leases were historically allocated for environmental projects and programs with a nexus to the extraction activities.
(k)
(n) In order for the state to maintain its strong coastal management program and to plan and prepare comprehensively for sea level rise in the face of a rapidly changing climate, it is appropriate to allocate revenues from nonrenewable resource royalties to purposes related to coastal resource protection and management, including forward-thinking sea level rise and climate change planning.