SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Leading gaming consultants estimate that in 2005, United States citizens illegally wagered four billion dollars ($4,000,000,000) online at off-shore, non-United States Internet gambling Web sites, and that every week more than 1,000,000 California citizens play poker on the Internet.
(b) Currently, 2,300 Internet gambling Web sites operate outside the United States, unregulated by any United States governmental entity and in violation of United States laws. Questions often arise about the honesty and the fairness of the games played on these Internet Web sites, and about
the true purpose for, and use of, proceeds generated by these unregulated Internet Web sites.
(c) In 2006, Congress passed, and the President signed, the Unlawful Internet Gambling Enforcement Act of 2006 (UIGEA). While UIGEA prohibits the use of banking instruments such as credit cards, checks, or fund transfers for interstate Internet gambling, the statute has not eliminated illegal, unregulated Internet gambling, nor has it provided any increased protection for participants from game operators and others who would impair the integrity of online gambling activity.
(d) Congress included specific provisions in the UIGEA for individual states to permit intrastate Internet gambling, provided that state laws permitting and regulating that activity could impose reasonable protections against participation by underage persons or by persons located outside the boundaries of the states
authorizing that activity.
(e) It is in the best interest of the state and its citizens to permit operation of government-regulated intrastate Internet poker wagering Web sites because only through that authorization and regulation can Californians be ensured that the games they are playing are honest, that winners are paid when and in amounts due, and that the state and its citizens, rather than illegal off-shore companies operating outside the reach of, and contrary to, state and federal laws, will benefit from economic activity in the state. Further, it is in the interest of the state to adopt a statutory basis for the regulation of intrastate Internet poker adequate to shield the state and players from organized crime and other corrupting influences, ensure that intrastate Internet poker is conducted fairly and honestly by both licensed entities and the players, confirm the integrity of all activities conducted pursuant to this act, and
protect the public health, welfare, and safety of all Californians.
(f) The California Constitution provides that “slot machines” can only be played if located on Indian lands and offered by an Indian tribe pursuant to a tribal-state gaming compact, and thus, the use of the devices connected to the Internet for gambling would violate the California Constitution unless those devices are solely used for the conveyance of information related to the play of nonbanked, nonpercentage poker games.
(g) The only practical and economically feasible way to ensure that Internet poker conducted entirely within California’s borders receives governmental oversight adequate to ensure that the Internet Web site offering the gaming remains honest, safe, and in compliance with all applicable state and federal laws, and that the State of California receives the economic benefits from that activity to
which the state is entitled, would be to limit that activity to up to five intrastate Internet Web sites owned and operated by entities formed under the laws of this state, or otherwise qualified to do business in this state, and owned and operated by business (1) persons or entities licensed under the Gambling Control Act to own and operate gambling establishments in this state as of January 1, 2011, and, (2) the governments or wholly owned
subentities of federally recognized California tribal governments. Because California law permits the operation of poker and other nonbanking, nonpercentage card games, those tribal governments are entitled under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (IGRA), to operate poker and other nonbanking and nonpercentage card games without having to enter into class III gaming compacts with the State of California. California tribal governments that have adopted a tribal gaming ordinance approved by the National Indian Gaming Commission (NIGC) under the federal Indian Gaming Regulatory Act (25 U.S.C. Sec. 2701 et seq.) (IGRA), (3) any combination of persons or entities licensed under the Gambling Control Act to own and operate gambling establishments in this state or the governments or wholly owned subentities of federally recognized California
tribal governments that have adopted a tribal gaming ordinance approved by the NIGC under IGRA, or (4) any person or entity determined to be eligible for licensure under the Gambling Control Act to own and operate a gambling establishment in this state.
(h) There is statutory precedent for the state to authorize existing entities to form associations or corporations to offer simulcast wagering and advance deposit wagering over the Internet on live horse racing meetings.
(i) Because the game of poker will be played live over the Internet pursuant to this act, it is the intent of the Legislature that similar authorization be given to California’s existing poker industry to form business entities that may be licensed to conduct the live online play of poker under this act.
(j) There are 109
federally recognized tribal governments in California and 91 California licensed gambling establishments. To provide the broadest distribution of these Internet poker licenses within a geographic area confined within the borders of this state to comply with UIGEA, recognize the large number of licensed gambling establishments and tribal governments currently offering or authorized to offer the game of poker in land-based operations, and maximize and expedite the receipt of revenue to the State of California, the eligible entities that include the greatest numbers of licensed gambling establishments and
federally recognized California tribal governments shall be selected for licensure to own and operate intrastate Internet poker Web sites pursuant to this act. California, entities formed under the laws of this state, or otherwise qualified to do business in this state, and owned and operated by (1) persons or entities licensed under the Gambling Control Act to own gambling establishments in this state, (2) the governments or wholly owned subentities of federally recognized California tribal governments that have adopted a tribal gaming ordinance approved by the NIGC under IGRA, or (3) any combination of persons or entities licensed under the Gambling Control Act to own gambling establishments in this state, or the governments or wholly owned subentities of federally recognized California tribal governments that have adopted a tribal gaming ordinance approved by the NIGC under IGRA, shall be presumed suitable for
immediate licensure under this chapter. All other applicants for licensure under this chapter shall first complete a full background investigation, in accordance with the Gambling Control Act and the requirements of this chapter, and shall not be eligible to receive a temporary or provisional license pending the completion of the investigation. A person or entity that has accepted wagers from persons in the United States on any form of Internet gaming that has not been affirmatively authorized by the laws of this state or the United States subsequent to the effective date of UIGEA, or is or has been the holder of a direct or indirect financial interest in such a person or entity, shall not be eligible for either a license to operate an intrastate Internet poker Web site or to be found suitable to provide goods or services to an entity licensed under this chapter.
(k) The purpose of this act is to provide persons over 21
years of age who are physically present within the State of California and desire to use the Internet to play poker games that are not prohibited by California law, and in a manner consistent with existing law, with a lawful, highly regulated means of doing so in conformity with all applicable laws and regulations. Therefore, nothing in this act, which authorizes the intrastate use of the Internet to conduct poker games, shall be construed to expand the term “gambling,” as used in Article 13 (commencing with Section 19960) of Chapter 5 of Division 8 of the Business and Professions Code.
(l) It is in the interest of the state and its citizens to increase sources of nontax, nonstate revenue for tribal governments to enhance their ability to provide services to their communities.
(m) By enacting this act, the Legislature is expressly authorizing intrastate Internet poker within the
State of California only in the limited and regulated form provided herein. This express authorization does not authorize any other form or type of gambling over the Internet.