(1) Existing law establishes a workers’ compensation system, administered by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, which requires employers to secure the payment of workers’ compensation, including medical treatment, for injuries incurred by their employees that arise out of, or in the course of, employment.
Existing law authorizes collective bargaining agreements between a private employer or groups of employers engaged in construction-related activities and a recognized or certified exclusive bargaining representative that establishes, among other things, a vocational rehabilitation or retraining program utilizing an agreed list of providers of rehabilitation services that may be the exclusive source of providers of rehabilitation services.
This bill would delete the provision providing that a collective bargaining
agreement may establish a vocational rehabilitation or retraining program and would make conforming changes.
(2) Existing law authorizes labor‑management agreements between an employer or groups of employers and a union that is the recognized or certified exclusive bargaining representative regarding various issues that are negotiated separate and apart from any collective bargaining agreement covering affected employees. The labor-management agreements may establish an alternative dispute resolution system, use of an agreed list of providers of medical treatment that may be the exclusive source of all workers’ compensation medical treatment, the use of an agreed, limited list of qualified medical evaluators that may be used exclusively for workers’ compensation purposes, joint labor management safety committees, a light‑duty modified job, or return‑to‑work program, or a vocation rehabilitation or retraining program that may be used exclusively
for workers’ compensation purposes.
This bill would delete the provision providing that the labor-management agreement may include a vocation rehabilitation or retraining program and would make conforming changes.
(3) Existing law provides that each inmate of a state penal or correctional institution shall be entitled to workers’ compensation benefits for injury arising out of, and in the course of, assigned employment and for the death of the inmate if the injury proximately causes the death, subject to specified conditions. Existing law provides that an employee who is an inmate, as defined, who is eligible for vocational rehabilitation, as defined, shall only be eligible for direct placement services.
This bill would delete the provision limiting eligibility to direct placement services.
(4) Existing workers’ compensation law requires the treating physician primarily responsible for managing the care of an injured worker, or a physician designated by the treating physician, to render opinions on all medical issues necessary to determine eligibility for compensation.
This bill would provide that no disputed medical issue, as specified, shall be the subject of declaration of readiness to proceed to a hearing unless there has been an evaluation by the treating physician or agreed or qualified medical evaluator.
(5) Existing law provides that if an employer objects to a report of the treating physician recommending that spinal surgery be performed, an orthopedic surgeon or neurosurgeon shall prepare a second opinion report resolving the disputed surgical recommendation, as specified. Existing law provides
that if the second opinion report does not recommend surgery, the employer shall file a declaration of readiness to proceed.
This bill would provide that if the second opinion does not recommend surgery, the employer shall file a declaration of readiness to proceed, unless the employee agrees in writing with the recommendation of the second opinion physician.
(6) Existing law provides that if a qualified medical evaluator selected from a panel of evaluators fails to complete the formal medical evaluation within the timeframes established by the Administrative Director of the Division of Workers’ Compensation, a new evaluation may be obtained, upon the request of either party.
This bill would require that a new evaluation may only be obtained if the party requests the new evaluation prior to the receipt of the evaluator’s report.
(7) Existing law provides that neither the employee nor the employer shall have any liability for payment for the formal medical evaluation that was not completed within the required timeframes unless the employee or employer, on prescribed forms, each then waives the right to a new evaluation and elects to accept the original evaluation even though it was not completed within the required timeframes.
This bill would, instead, provide that neither the employee nor the employer shall have any liability if either party objects to the report prior to receipt of the report and that if neither objects, each then waives the right to a new evaluation and elects to accept the original evaluation.
(8) Existing law provides that where an asbestos worker, as defined, is injured as a result of asbestosis, as defined, and makes a claim for workers’
compensation, if the responsible employer cannot be located or fails to provider workers’ compensation within 30 days, the worker may seek the payment of workers’ compensation temporary disability and medical benefits from the continuously appropriated Asbestos Workers’ Account in the Uninsured Employers Fund in the State Treasury. Existing law provides that once a decision establishing the responsible employer or insurance carrier is agreed upon between the parties, or is issued by the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board, and becomes final, the Asbestos Workers’ Account shall terminate payment of compensation benefits, notify all interested parties accordingly, and seek reimbursement for the benefits the account paid out.
(9) Existing law provides that the above provisions shall be operative only until January 1, 1989, and as of that date all payments from the fund shall be terminated, and the state shall have no further obligation to pay
asbestos workers’ benefits, unless a later enacted act that is chaptered before January 1, 1989, deletes or extends that date. Existing law provides, however, that if no statute is enacted to delete or extend that date prior to January 1, 1989, the authority of the Asbestos Workers’ Account to recover the benefits and costs paid to asbestos workers prior to that date shall continue until the benefits and costs have been recovered.
This bill would delete the above provisions.
(10) Under existing law, the employee, or the dependents of a deceased employee, shall be reimbursed for his or her medical-legal expenses, as defined. Existing law provides that, except as provided, no comprehensive medical-legal evaluations, except those at the request of the employer, shall be performed during the first 60 days after the notice of claim has been filed, and neither the employer nor the employee shall be liable
for any expenses incurred for comprehensive medical-legal evaluations performed within the first 60 days after the notice of claim has been filed.
This bill would, instead, provide that neither the employer nor the employee shall be liable for any medical-legal expenses incurred outside of specified provisions.
(11) Existing law requires that a disability indemnity payment made by any written instrument be immediately negotiable and payable in cash on demand. Existing law provides that an employer may deposit the disability indemnity payment in an account in any bank, savings and loan association, or credit union of the employee’s choice in California, provided the employee has voluntarily authorized the deposit.
This bill would no longer authorize an employer to deposit the disability indemnity payment in an account in a savings and loan association.
(12) Under the workers’ compensation system, the Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board has jurisdiction to determine claims by employees who have sustained injuries in the course of his or her employment.
Existing law prohibits petitions filed with the appeals board concerning a continuing temporary disability award from being granted while the injured worker is pursuing a rehabilitation plan.
This bill would delete the above provision.
(13) Existing workers’ compensation law authorizes the appeals board to determine and allow specified expenses, including reasonable attorney’s fees for legal services, as liens against any sum to be paid as compensation. Existing law prohibits a fee for legal services from being awarded to any representative who is not an attorney, except with respect to those claims
for compensation for which an application, as specified, has been filed with the appeals board on or before December 31, 1991, or for which a disclosure form, as specified, has been sent to the employer, or insurer or 3rd-party administrator, if either is known, on or before December 31, 1991.
This bill would, instead, prohibit a fee for legal services from being awarded to any representative who is not an attorney and would no longer provide for an exception.
(14) Existing law prohibits a lien claim for reasonable expenses incurred by or on behalf of the injured employee and medical-legal expenses from being filed after 6 months from the date on which the appeals board or a workers’ compensation administrative law judge issues a final decision, findings, order, including an order approving compromise and release, or award, on the merits of the claim, after 5 years from the date of the injury for which
the services were provided, or after one year from the date the services were provided, whichever is later.
(15) Existing law provides that where it appears in any proceeding pending before the appeals board that a lien should be allowed if it had been duly requested by the party entitled thereto, the appeals board may, without any request for the lien having been made, order the payment of the claim to be made directly to the person entitled, as specified.
This bill would prohibit the appeals board from ordering the payment of the claim if the party entitled to it did not comply with the 6-month timeframe relating to reasonable expenses incurred by or on behalf of the injured employee and medical-legal expenses.
(16) Existing law requires the workers’ compensation judge at each district office to prepare a list of all eligible attorneys
who apply to be placed on the list of eligible arbitrators. Existing law prohibits an attorney from being included in the panel of arbitrators if he or she has served as a judge in any proceeding involving the same case.
This bill would authorize the parties to the case to waive the prohibition of an attorney who had served as a judge in any proceeding involving the same case.
(17) Under existing law, when a workers’ compensation dispute is submitted for arbitration, the workers’ compensation judge is required to add certain arbitrators to the arbitration panel depending upon the composition of the parties in the case.
This bill would provide that when an applicant or lien claimant is a party to the relevant claim, for each additional party in the capacity of employer, the presiding judge shall assign a retired workers’ compensation judge or retired appeals
board commissioner and an applicant’s attorney to the arbitration panel. The bill would provide that when the dispute involves solely defendants, for each additional party in the capacity of employer beyond 2 employers, the presiding judge shall assign a workers’ compensation judge or retired appeals board commissioner and an applicant’s attorney.
(18) Existing law specifies locations where a workers’ compensation claim may be filed. Under existing law, if the venue site where the application is to be filed is the county where the employee’s attorney maintains his or her principal business, the attorney for the employee shall indicate that venue site when forwarding a information request form. Existing law provides the employer with 30 days from receipt of the information request form to object to the selected venue site.
This bill would, instead, provide that if the venue site where the application is
to be filed is the county where the employee’s attorney maintains his or her principal business, the employer shall have 30 days from receipt of the conforming application, as defined, to file and serve an objection to the selected venue site.
(19) Existing law requires all oral testimony, objections, and rulings at all hearings and investigations before the appeals board or a workers’ compensation judge to be taken down in shorthand by a competent phonographic reporter.
This bill would, instead, require all oral testimony, objections, and rulings to be recorded on a permanent accessible record by a competent hearing reporter.