(1) Existing law provides for the establishment of standards for various agricultural products, including fruits, nuts, and vegetables, and authorizes the use of the term “California grown” and similar terms for marketing, advertising, or promotional purposes only to identify food or agricultural products that have been produced in the state or harvested in its surface or coastal waters, and makes the fraudulent use of the term or a deliberately misleading or unwarranted use of the term a misdemeanor punishable by a fine of not less than $100 or more than $3,000, or by imprisonment in the county jail for not more than 6 months, or by both the fine and imprisonment.
This bill would make it unlawful for any person or entity, or employee or agent of that person or entity, to make any statement, representation, or assertion
relating to the sale or availability of agricultural products that is false, deceptive, or misleading, as specified, and would make a violation of those provisions a misdemeanor punishable by imprisonment in the county jail not exceeding 6 months, by a fine not exceeding $2,500, or both the fine and imprisonment. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The bill would also authorize the Secretary of Food and Agriculture or a county agricultural commissioner, in lieu of prosecution, to levy a civil penalty, as specified. The bill would make those penalties applicable to the fraudulent use of the term “California grown,” as specified above. The bill would require the civil penalties collected by a county agricultural commissioner to be paid to the county treasurer, and would require civil penalties collected by the secretary to be deposited in the Direct Agricultural Marketing Penalty Account, which would be created in the
Department of Food and Agriculture Fund, as continuously appropriated funds to be used to conduct investigations and enforcement actions relating to false, deceptive, or misleading statements relating to agricultural products, and for other specified purposes. By establishing a continuously appropriated fund, the bill would make an appropriation.
(2) Existing law regulates the direct marketing of agricultural products, and authorizes the secretary to adopt regulations in that regard.
This bill would define the terms “producer,” “practice of agricultural arts,” and “agricultural product” for purposes of the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize the secretary to enter into a cooperative agreement with any county agricultural commissioner for purposes relating to the direct marketing of agricultural products, and would require compensation to be paid under those cooperative
agreements from moneys derived from assessments and fees collected pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing. The bill would authorize a certified farmers’ market operator to contract with a county agricultural commissioner for verification inspections, as specified.
(3) Existing law specifies that certified farmers’ markets are locations established in accordance with local ordinances, and requires the governing body of a certified farmers’ market with more than one participating certified producer to adopt written rules and procedures pertaining to the operation of the certified farmers’ market.
This bill would instead provide that certified farmers’ markets are California agricultural product point of sale locations that are registered and operated in accordance with specified provisions of law. The bill would require vendors of agricultural products selling within a certified farmers’
market to comply with specified signage and labeling requirements, and would make those representations subject to criminal, civil, and administrative penalties, as specified. By creating a new crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program. The bill would repeal provisions authorizing an aggrieved certified producer to submit a request to the Department of Food and Agriculture for an advisory opinion, and for the department to issue the advisory opinion, and would repeal provisions requiring the department to provide for an informal hearing process for grievances relating to certified farmers’ markets.
(4) Existing law requires the secretary to establish the Certified Farmers’ Market Advisory Committee, composed of 17 members serving 2-year terms, to advise the secretary on matters relating to direct marketing and certified farmers’ markets.
This bill would revise the primary goals of the
committee and the matters on which the committee may make recommendations to the secretary. The bill would decrease the number of members on the committee from 17 members to 14 members, and would specify that members of the committee serve for 2-year terms or at the pleasure of the secretary.
(5) Existing law specifies that a certified farmers’ market certificate or a certified producer’s certificate obtained from a county agricultural commissioner is valid for 12 months and requires a county agricultural commissioner to inspect certified farmers’ markets and the properties of certified producers, as specified. Existing law authorizes a county agricultural commissioner to charge a certification and inspection fee of up to $60 per hour, except as specified.
This bill would instead require a certified farmers’ market operator or producer to annually register with the department by applying for and
receiving a certificate from a county agricultural commissioner, and would revise the requirements for obtaining that certificate.
(6) Existing law requires, until January 1, 2018, that an operator of a certified farmers’ market remit to the department a fee, as established by the department each year, equal to the number of certified producer certificates and other agricultural producers participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter, to be deposited in the Food and Agriculture Fund and, upon appropriation by the Legislature, to be used by the department for specified purposes.
This bill would instead require a fee of $2 for each vendor participating and selling goods under the authority and management of the certified farmers’ market operator participating on each market day for the entire previous quarter to be remitted to the department. The bill would authorize operators of
certified farmers’ markets meeting specified requirement to petition the secretary for a vendor fee of $1. The bill would revise the purposes for which the fees may be used, including, among other things, for investigation and enforcement expenses, including expenses incurred by county agricultural commissioners for actions conducted pursuant to the provisions relating to direct marketing.
(7) Because the bill would create new crimes, and by imposing new requirements on county agricultural commissioners, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is
required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.