(2) The high school exit examination developed pursuant to Section 60850.
(2)(A)Until July 1, 2013, results of the tests identified in paragraph (1) shall constitute at least 60 percent of the value of the index.
(B)From July 1, 2013,
to June 30, 2016, inclusive, results of tests identified in paragraph (1) shall constitute at least 50 percent of the value of the index.
(C)Commencing with the 2016–17 fiscal year, the Superintendent shall implement all of the following:
(i)Results of the achievement test and other tests specified in this subdivision shall constitute 50 percent of the value of the index.
(ii)The indicators described in subdivision (c) shall collectively constitute 50 percent of the value of the index.
(iii)Except as provided in clause (iv), the indicators described in subdivision (c) shall be assigned equal weight in the API.
(iv)The indicators described in subdivision (c) shall be designed in a manner that gives additional weight to the combined rates by which pupils satisfy
the conditions described in paragraphs (2) and (3) of subdivision (c).
(c) In addition to the pupil scores from the tests set forth in subdivision (b) and commencing with the 2012–13 fiscal year, the Superintendent, in consultation with the state board, shall incorporate the following indicators into the API for schools serving any of grades 8 to 12, inclusive, using the best available data:
(1) High school graduation rates calculated as specified in subparagraph (A) of paragraph (4) of subdivision (a).
(2) Rates by which pupils complete a course of study at an achievement level that fulfills the requirements and prerequisites for admission to California public institutions of postsecondary education, as set forth in subdivision (a) of Section 51228.
(3) Rates by which pupils complete a course of study that provides the skills and knowledge necessary to attain entry-level employment in business or industry when they graduate from high school, as set forth in subdivision (b) of Section 51228. For purposes of this paragraph, the Superintendent shall use indicators derived from one or more of the following:
(A) Satisfactory completion of a designated career and technical education course or series of courses that meet the career technical education content standards adopted by the state board.
(B) The number or percentage of pupils who earn a certificate, license, or the equivalent in the designated occupation for which it is issued.
(C) The scores of pupils on valid and reliable assessments, including portfolio assessments, that are designed to assess
the degree to which pupils have acquired the skills and knowledge necessary to be successful in a specific occupation or in the general workforce.
(D) Workforce outcomes for pupils graduating from high school may include, but are not limited to, employment rates and earnings.
(d) Based on the API, the Superintendent shall develop, and the state board shall adopt, expected annual percentage growth targets for all schools based on their API baseline score from the previous year. Schools are expected to meet these growth targets through effective allocation of available resources. For schools below the statewide API performance target adopted by the state board pursuant to subdivision (e), the minimum annual percentage growth target shall be 5 percent of the difference between the actual API score of a school and the statewide API performance target, or one API point, whichever is
greater. Schools at or above the statewide API performance target shall have, as their growth target, maintenance of their API score above the statewide API performance target. However, the state board may set differential growth targets based on grade level of instruction and may set higher growth targets for the lowest performing schools because they have the greatest room for improvement. To meet its growth target, a school shall demonstrate that the annual growth in its API is equal to or more than its schoolwide annual percentage growth target and that all numerically significant pupil subgroups, as defined in subdivision (a), are making comparable improvement.
(e) Upon adoption of state performance standards by the state board, the Superintendent shall recommend, and the state board shall adopt, a statewide API performance target that includes consideration of performance standards and represents the proficiency level required to meet the
state performance target. When the API is fully developed, schools, at a minimum, shall meet their annual API growth targets to be eligible for the Governor’s Performance Award Program as set forth in Section 52057. The state board may establish additional criteria that schools must meet to be eligible for the Governor’s Performance Award Program.
(f) The API shall be used for both of the following:
(1) Measuring the progress of schools selected for participation in the Immediate Intervention/Underperforming Schools Program pursuant to Section 52053.
(2) Ranking all public schools in the state for the purpose of the High Achieving/Improving Schools Program pursuant to Section 52056.
(g) (1) A school with 11 to 99 pupils with valid
test scores shall receive an API score with an asterisk that indicates less statistical certainty than API scores based on 100 or more test scores.
(2) A school annually shall receive an API score, unless the Superintendent determines that an API score would be an invalid measure of the performance of the school for one or more of the following reasons:
(A) Irregularities in testing procedures occurred.
(B) The data used to calculate the API score of the school are not representative of the pupil population at the school.
(C) Significant demographic changes in the pupil population render year-to-year comparisons of pupil performance invalid.
(D) The department discovers or receives
information indicating that the integrity of the API score has been compromised.
(E) Insufficient pupil participation in the assessments included in the API.
(3) If a school has fewer than 100 pupils with valid test scores, the calculation of the API or adequate yearly progress pursuant to the federal No Child Left Behind Act of 2001 (20 U.S.C. Sec. 6301 et seq.) and federal regulations may be calculated over more than one annual administration of the tests administered pursuant to Section 60640 and the high school exit examination administered pursuant to Section 60851, consistent with regulations adopted by the state board.
(h) Only schools with 100 or more test scores contributing to the API may be included in the API rankings.
(i) The
Superintendent, with the approval of the state board, shall develop an alternative accountability system for schools under the jurisdiction of a county board of education or a county superintendent of schools, community day schools, nonpublic, nonsectarian schools pursuant to Section 56366, and alternative schools serving high-risk pupils, including continuation high schools and opportunity schools. Schools in the alternative accountability system may receive an API score, but shall not be included in the API rankings.
(j) The advisory committee established pursuant to Section 52052.5 shall provide recommendations for the implementation of subdivisions (b) and (c). The advisory committee also shall develop recommendations for the inclusion of multiple measures in the API of middle and junior high schools.