Amended
IN
Assembly
January 04, 2010 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
April 20, 2009 |
Introduced by
Assembly Member
Nava, Arambula (Principal Coauthor(s): Assembly Member Galgiani) (Coauthor(s): Assembly Member Beall, Block, Buchanan, Caballero, Carter, Conway, Coto, Davis, De Leon, DeVore, Fong, Gilmore, Hagman, Huber, Bonnie Lowenthal, Ma, Mendoza, Monning, John A. Perez, Ruskin, Salas, Saldana, Audra Strickland, Swanson, Torrico, Tran, Villines) (Coauthor(s): Senator Alquist, Ashburn, Benoit, Cogdill, Correa, Cox, DeSaulnier, Ducheny, Florez, Lowenthal, Maldonado, Negrete McLeod, Price, Romero, Runner, Strickland, Walters) |
December 10, 2008 |
Existing law generally makes actionable the use of libelous or slanderous materials in campaign advertising and communications.
This bill would prohibit a person, as defined, from knowingly using the name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness of a minor in an advertisement or communication for or against a candidate or a ballot measure without the written consent of the parent or legal guardian of the minor, if the minor is under 12 years of age, or the written consent of the minor, if the minor is 12 years of age or older. The bill would provide that violation of this provision is subject to a civil penalty for each instance in which the violating advertisement or communication is aired or published, if a court finds that the privacy interests of the minor outweigh the speech interests of the person.
(a)A person shall not knowingly use the name, voice, signature, photograph, or likeness of a minor in an advertisement or communication for or against a candidate or a ballot measure without prior written consent from either of the following:
(1)The parent or legal guardian of the minor, if the minor is under 12 years of age.
(2)The minor, if he or she is 12 years of age or older.
(b)A violation of subdivision (a) is subject to a civil penalty of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) for each instance in which the advertisement or communication is published or aired if a court of competent jurisdiction finds that the privacy interests of the minor whose identifying information was used in the advertisement or communication outweigh the speech interests of the
person who used the identifying information of the minor in the advertisement or communication.
(c)For purposes of this chapter, the following terms have the following meanings:
(1)“Minor” has the same meaning as used in Section 6500 of the Family Code.
(2)“Person” has the same meaning as used in Section 20200.