(1) Existing law does not provide a system of health care coverage for all California residents. Existing law does not require employers to provide health care coverage for employees and dependents, other than coverage provided as part of the workers’ compensation system for work-related employee injuries, and does not require individuals to maintain health care coverage. Existing law provides for the creation of various programs to provide health care coverage to individuals who have limited incomes and meet various eligibility requirements. These programs include the Healthy Families Program, administered by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, and the Medi-Cal program, administered by the State Department of Health Care Services and county welfare departments. Existing law provides for the regulation of health care service plans by the Department of Managed
Health Care, under the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975, and health insurers by the Department of Insurance. Existing law sets forth various provisions governing individual contracts for health care coverage.
This bill would, on and after July 1, 2010, require all California residents, as defined, to obtain minimum health care coverage, as defined, and would require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services, subject to an appropriation of funds therefor, to establish methods to inform individuals of that requirement and to enforce the requirement by entering into an agreement with the Franchise Tax Board and through other specified means. However, compliance with the requirement to obtain minimum health care coverage would not be required until the provisions relating to enforcement are implemented. The bill would also require the Secretary of California Health and Human Services to, among other things, track and assess the effects of this
act, as specified.
The bill would require health care service plans and health insurers offering individual contracts and policies to offer individual contracts and policies that provide minimum health care coverage, as established by the Secretary of California Health and Human Services, and would require the Department of Managed Health Care and the Department of Insurance to jointly develop a system to categorize those contracts into 5 coverage choice categories. The bill would enact various health insurance market reforms, to be operative on specified dates, including requirements for guarantee issue and guarantee renewability of individual health care service plan contracts and individual health insurance policies. However, these requirements would only become operative when the provisions relating to enforcement of the requirement for individuals to obtain minimum health care coverage are implemented. The bill would require, on and after July 1, 2010, a health
care service plan and a health insurer, as specified, to expend for health care benefits, as defined, 85% of certain payments they receive. The bill would require the Department of Insurance and the Department of Managed Health Care to jointly adopt regulations to establish uniform reporting by plans and insurers to determine compliance with this requirement, as specified.
The bill would require specified group health care service plan contracts and group health insurance policies offered, amended, or renewed on or after January 1, 2009, to offer at least one benefit design that includes a Healthy Action Incentives and Rewards Program, as specified. The bill would also authorize an employer to provide health coverage that includes a Healthy Action Incentives and Rewards Program to his or her employees.
The bill would also, as of January 1, 2009, require the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to establish and administer
the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program to make subsidized and unsubsidized health care coverage meeting or exceeding the requirements for minimum health care coverage available effective July 1, 2010. The bill would also authorize the board, upon making certain determinations, to make available unsubsidized dental and vision coverage. The bill would establish the premiums applicable to and the eligibility criteria needed to purchase that coverage. The bill would provide for the appeal of certain decisions and enact related provisions. The bill would also create the California Health Trust Fund in the State Treasury and continuously appropriate moneys in that fund to the board to provide health care coverage and for the program’s expenses, as specified.
In addition, the bill would make it an unfair labor practice for an employer to refer an employee, or his or her dependent, to the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program or to arrange for their
application to that program to separate them from group coverage provided through the employment relationship, and for an employer to change the share-of-cost ratio or modify coverage in order for an employee or his or her dependents to enroll in that program. Because an unfair labor practice may be punishable as a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(2) Existing law requires health care service plans to collect and report to the Department of Managed Health Care specified information from providers and requires the department to conduct periodic onsite medical surveys of the health delivery system of each plan.
The bill would make a plan that provides services to a beneficiary of the Medi-Cal program, as specified, subject only to the filing, reporting, monitoring, and survey requirements for the Medi-Cal managed care program for designated subjects. The bill would require the
department and the State Department of Health Care Services to develop a joint filing and review process for medical quality surveys.
(3) Existing law requires health care service plans that provide prescription drug benefits and maintain one or more drug formularies to provide members of the public, upon request, with a copy of the most current list of prescription drugs on the plan formulary, as specified.
This bill would require a health care service plan providing prescription drug benefits and maintaining a drug formulary to, commencing on or before January 1, 2010, make the most current formularies available electronically to prescribers and pharmacies.
(4) Under existing law, a willful violation of the Knox-Keene Health Care Service Plan Act of 1975 is a crime.
Because a willful violation
of the requirements described above relative to health care services plans would be a crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(5) Existing law provides for the licensure and regulation of health facilities by the State Department of Public Health. Existing law requires a noncontracting hospital to contact an enrollee’s health care service plan to obtain the enrollee’s medical record information prior to admitting the enrollee for inpatient poststabilization care, as defined, or prior to transferring the enrollee, if certain conditions apply. Existing law prohibits the hospital from billing the enrollee for poststabilization care if it is required to, and fails to, contact the enrollee’s health care services plan. Under existing law, a violation of any of these provisions is punishable as a misdemeanor.
This bill would prohibit a noncontracting hospital, as defined, from billing a
covered patient for nonemergency health care services and poststabilizing care except for applicable copayments and cost shares. By changing the definition of an existing crime, this bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(6) Existing law imposes various responsibilities and duties on the State Department of Public Health relating to tobacco use and prevention programs, including administering funding for programs relating to smoking cessation, such as the California Smokers’ Helpline.
This bill would require the department, to the extent that funds are available and appropriated for this purpose, to increase the capacity of effective smoking cessation services available from, and expand the awareness of services available through, the California Smokers’ Helpline, as prescribed. The bill would require the department, in consultation with the Department of Managed Health Care, the State
Department of Health Care Services, the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, and the Department of Insurance, to annually identify the 10 largest providers of health care coverage in the state, to ascertain and summarize the smoking cessation benefits provided by those coverage providers, to publish the benefit summary on the department’s Web site, to include the benefit summary as part of its preventive health education against tobacco use campaign, and to evaluate any changes in connection with the smoking cessation benefits provided by the coverage providers, as provided.
The bill would also create the Community Makeover Grant program that would be administered by the department and would require it to award grants to local health departments in cities and counties, which would serve as the local lead agencies in administering the program, for the purpose of developing new programs or improving existing programs that promote active living and healthy eating. The
bill would require the department to issue guidelines and to specify data reporting requirements for local lead agencies to comply with various requirements relating to the administration of the program. The bill would also require the department to develop a sustained media campaign to educate the public about the importance of obesity prevention.
(7) Existing law establishes the Healthy Families Program, administered by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, to arrange for the provision of health, dental, and vision services to eligible children. Existing law provides for the Healthy Families Fund, which is continuously appropriated to the board for the purposes of funding the Healthy Families Program. Eligibility requirements for the program include being a child in a family with a household income equal to or less than 200% of the federal poverty level. Existing law also requires applicants applying to the purchasing pool to agree to pay
family contributions, unless the applicant has a family contribution sponsor. Existing law further requires the board to determine eligibility for the Healthy Families Program, and prohibits a child who is a qualified alien, as defined under federal law, from being determined ineligible for the Healthy Families Program solely on the basis of his or her date of entry into the United States.
This bill would, on July 1, 2010, revise the contribution amounts required to be paid under the Healthy Families Program. To the extent the bill would increase amounts deposited in a continuously appropriated fund, it would make an appropriation. Commencing on July 1, 2010, this bill would also expand coverage under the Healthy Families Program to include a child in a family with a household income that is equal to or less than 300% of the federal poverty level. This bill would, on July 1, 2010, notwithstanding any other provision of law, prohibit a child who is otherwise eligible
for services under the Healthy Families Program from being determined ineligible solely on the basis of his or her immigration status.
This bill would also, upon implementation of a specified provision, authorize each county department that is required to make eligibility determinations for the Medi-Cal program to also make the eligibility determinations for the Healthy Families Program and for the subsidized coverage made available in the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program.
In addition, this bill would establish confidentiality procedures applicable to information concerning applicants, subscribers, and household members made or kept in connection with the administration of the Healthy Families Program and would require the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board to develop documentation procedures for certain program applicants.
(8) Existing law
provides for the Medi-Cal program, which is administered by the State Department of Health Care Services, and under which qualified low-income persons receive health care benefits. Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to exercise its option under federal law to expand Medi-Cal eligibility by establishing the amount of countable resources individuals and families are allowed to retain at the same amount medically needy individuals and families, as defined, are allowed to retain, as specified.
This bill would require the department to exercise its federal option as necessary to simplify Medi-Cal eligibility by exempting all resources for applicants and recipients, commencing July 1, 2010. The bill would provide Medi-Cal benefits to, among others, individuals under 19 years of age who would be eligible for full-scope benefits without a share of cost, but for their immigration status, as specified. The bill would also expand eligibility
under the Medi-Cal program, commencing July 1, 2010, by, among other things, requiring the department to provide Medi-Cal benefits to specified populations, including parents and caretaker relatives, and individuals 19 and 20 years of age who meet designated eligibility requirements. The bill would require certain of these individuals to receive their benefits in the form of a benchmark package, which would be the subsidized benefit package or packages established under the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program. The bill would provide for the benchmark benefits to be administered by the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, pursuant to a cooperative agreement with the department. The bill would exempt designated categories of beneficiaries from mandatory enrollment in the benchmark package. The bill would make these provisions subject to federal financial participation and approval, as specified.
Because each county is required to determine eligibility for
the Medi-Cal program, this bill would, by expanding program eligibility, impose a state-mandated local program.
In addition, the bill would create the Local Coverage Options program and authorize the Director of Health Care Services to contract with specified counties to provide the benchmark package benefits discussed above to county residents who, among other requirements, have a family income at or below 100% of the federal poverty level and are not eligible for Medi-Cal. The bill would require the department to request for applications from those counties, would specify the information required to be included in the applications, and would enact other related provisions. The bill would make implementation of these provisions contingent on the establishment of certain requirements under which counties pay a share of cost for persons enrolled in the Medi-Cal program or the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program, as specified.
(9) Existing law requires the State Department of Health Care Services to implement a requirement for beneficiaries of the Medi-Cal program to file semiannual status reports, as specified.
This bill would instead require the department, commencing July 1, 2010, to implement a requirement for any beneficiary who is not required to make premium payments to file a semiannual address verification report. The bill would exempt certain beneficiaries from this requirement, and would suspend operation of the semiannual status report requirement during the implementation of the address verification report requirement. The bill would also make various conforming changes.
(10) Existing law requires that funds for the administration of the Medi-Cal program be advanced to the counties for the costs of administering the program, and provides that such
advances may be made to counties for the costs of care under the program.
This bill would declare the Legislature’s findings that counties would benefit from the bill’s provisions and should contribute to the cost of providing health care coverage to persons who were without private coverage and ineligible for state coverage. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to establish a mechanism through which counties are required to contribute to the cost of providing health care coverage to individuals currently relying on counties for medical services.
(11) Existing law authorizes the California Medical Assistance Commission to negotiate selective provider contracts with eligible hospitals to provide inpatient hospital services to Medi-Cal beneficiaries. Under existing law, the Medi-Cal Hospital/Uninsured Care Demonstration Project Act, specified hospital reimbursement methodologies are
applied in order to maximize the use of federal funds consistent with federal Medicaid law and stabilize the distribution of funding for hospitals that provide care to Medi-Cal beneficiaries and uninsured patients. Funding for the demonstration project comes from, in part, the Health Care Support Fund, which is a continuously appropriated fund in the State Treasury consisting of federal safety net care pool funds, as defined, that are claimed and received by the department.
This bill would enact the Medi-Cal Hospital Rate Stabilization Act, which would revise the methodology by which safety net care pool funds are paid to designated public hospitals. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to determine new methods and standards for payments for outpatient services, as defined, and to determine an inpatient base rate, as defined. The bill would authorize a designated public hospital, or governmental entity with which it is affiliated, that
operates a nonhospital clinic or that provides other health care services other than hospital services, to receive from the Health Care Support Fund, to the extent funds are available, an amount equal to the federal funds derived from the certification of all or a portion of the hospital’s or entity’s uncompensated costs for providing services to the uninsured. If, for any fiscal year, the amount payable from the Health Care Support Fund pursuant to the act’s provisions is insufficient, this bill would require each designated public hospital or governmental entity to receive a pro rata share of these funds, as determined in accordance with a specified formula. The bill would also, commencing July 1, 2010, establish specified reimbursement rate methodologies under the Medi-Cal program for hospital services, as defined, that are rendered by designated public hospitals, as specified. The bill would specify, for the 2010–11 fiscal year, that the nonfederal share of payments for inpatient hospital services be
made from appropriations in the annual Budget Act and would also specify, for the 2011–12 fiscal year and thereafter, the computation methodology for those payments. The bill would make implementation of these provisions contingent on the establishment of certain requirements under which counties pay a share of cost for persons enrolled in the Medi-Cal program or the Health Care Security and Cost Reduction Program, as specified, and the imposition of a 4% fee on the net patient revenue of acute care hospitals.
This bill would also enact the Medi-Cal Physician Services Rate Increase Act, which would establish, with respect to services rendered to Medi-Cal beneficiaries on and after July 1, 2010, increased reimbursements for physicians, physician groups, podiatrists, and nonphysician medical practitioners, as defined, that are enrolled Medi-Cal providers eligible to receive payments for Medi-Cal services. The bill would permit some of these rate increases to be linked
to specified performance measures, and would provide that these rate increases would only be implemented to the extent that state funds are appropriated for the nonfederal share of these increases. The bill would require the Director of Health Care Services to seek federal approval of the rate methodology set forth in the act and would prohibit the methodology from being implemented if federal approval is not obtained.
(12) Existing law specifies certain covered benefits under the Medi-Cal program.
This bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to establish a Healthy Action Incentives and Rewards Program, as specified, to be provided as a covered benefit under the Medi-Cal program to the extent allowed under federal law and to the extent that federal financial participation is provided for that purpose.
The bill would also establish, as a
Medi-Cal benefit, the Comprehensive Diabetes Services Program to provide, to the extent allowed under federal law and to the extent federal participation is available and obtained for this purpose, comprehensive diabetes prevention and management services to individuals that meet specified eligibility criteria. The bill would require the State Department of Health Care Services to develop and implement incentives for fee-for-service eligible beneficiaries and providers who participate in the program, as provided.
The bill would require the department, in consultation with the California Diabetes Program, which this bill would also create within the State Department of Public Health, to contract with an independent organization to evaluate and report health outcomes and cost savings in connection to the Comprehensive Diabetes Services Program. The bill would require the California Diabetes Program to provide information on diabetes prevention to the public and
technical assistance to the Medi-Cal program and the State Department of Health Care Services provided that funds are appropriated for those purposes, as specified.
(13) Under existing federal law, a cafeteria plan is a written plan through which employees choose among 2 or more benefits consisting of cash and qualified benefits. Existing federal law provides that, except as specified, no amount is included in the gross income of a participant in a cafeteria plan solely because the participant may choose among the benefits of the plan.
This bill would, beginning January 1, 2010, require an employer, as defined, of 2 or more full-time equivalent employees in the state to adopt and maintain a cafeteria plan to allow employees to pay premiums for health care coverage to the extent amounts for that coverage are excludable from the gross income of the employee, as specified. The bill would require an
employer who fails to establish or maintain a cafeteria plan to pay a penalty of $100 or $500 per employee, as specified.
(14) Existing law, the Personal Income Tax Law, authorizes various deductions in computing income that is subject to tax under that law and also authorizes various credits against the taxes imposed by that law.
This bill would, for taxable years beginning on or after January 1, 2010, allow a deduction in connection with health savings accounts in conformity with federal law. In general, the deduction would be an amount equal to the aggregate amount paid in cash during the taxable year by or on behalf of an eligible individual, as defined, to a health savings account of that individual, as provided. This bill would provide related conformity to federal law with respect to treatment of the account as a tax-exempt trust, the allowance of rollovers from the Archer Medical Savings
Accounts to a health savings account, and penalties in connection therewith. The bill would also declare the intent of the Legislature to establish a tax credit to enhance the affordability of health care coverage for persons and families not eligible for enrollment in publicly subsidized coverage, as specified, and would set forth the intended structure of that tax credit.
(15) Existing law provides for the certification and regulation of nurses, including nurse practitioners and nurse-midwives, by the Board of Registered Nursing and for the licensure and regulation of physician assistants by the Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board of California. Existing law provides that a medical assistant may administer medication upon the specific authorization and supervision of a licensed physician and surgeon or licensed podiatrist or, in specified clinic settings, upon the specific authorization and supervision of a nurse practitioner,
nurse-midwife, or physician assistant.
This bill would remove the requirement that a medical assistant’s administration of medication upon the specific authorization and supervision of a nurse practitioner, nurse-midwife, or physician assistant occur in specified clinic settings, and would make related changes.
(16) Existing law, the Nursing Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of nurse practitioners by the Board of Registered Nursing which is within the Department of Consumer Affairs. Under existing law, a physician and surgeon is prohibited from supervising more than 4 nurse practitioners at one time.
This bill would instead prohibit a physician and surgeon from supervising more than 6 nurse practitioners at one time. The bill would create the Task Force on Nurse Practitioner Scope of Practice that would consist of specified members
appointed by the Governor, the Speaker of the Assembly, and the Senate Committee on Rules. The bill would make the task force responsible for developing a recommended scope of practice for nurse practitioners and would require the task force to report the recommended scope of practice to the Governor and the Legislature on or before June 30, 2009. The bill would require the Director of Consumer Affairs, on or before July 1, 2010, to promulgate regulations that adopt the recommended scope of practice. The bill would require the aforementioned boards to pay the state administrative costs of implementing these provisions.
(17) Existing law, the Physician Assistant Practice Act, provides for the licensure and regulation of physician assistants by the Physician Assistant Committee of the Medical Board of California. Existing law prohibits a physician from supervising more than 2 physician assistants at one time, except as specified.
This bill would instead prohibit a physician and surgeon from supervising more than 6 physician assistants at one time.
(18) Existing law relative to insurance fraud makes it a crime for healing arts practitioners to receive money or other consideration for, or to engage in various related activities with respect to, the referral of patients, clients, or customers to any person. Existing law exempts from this provision specified entities that receive nonmonetary remuneration necessary and used solely to receive and transmit electronic prescription information, with regard to specified drugs.
This bill would include all drugs covered by the Medi-Cal program as drugs eligible for the exemptions, and would exempt from the prohibition pharmacists or pharmacies participating in the network of a Medi-Cal managed care organization and health care professionals receiving
such remuneration from Medi-Cal managed care organizations.
The bill would also define electronic prescribing, and would require electronic prescribing and electronic prescribing systems to meet specified standards and requirements, including the sharing of specified information. The bill would require a prescriber or prescriber’s authorized agent to give patients a written receipt containing specified information, including the patient’s name and the drug prescribed, and would require the State Department of Health Care Services to develop a pilot program to foster the adoption and use of electronic prescribing by health care providers that contract with Medi-Cal, as specified. The bill would require every licensed prescriber, or prescriber’s authorized agent, or pharmacy operating in California to, on or before January 1, 2010, have the ability to transmit and receive prescriptions by electronic data transmission.
(19) Existing law, the Public Employees’ Medical and Hospital Care Act, authorizes the Board of Administration of the Public Employees’ Retirement System to contract with carriers of health benefit plans and major medical plans for employees and annuitants, as defined, and approve other specified plans.
This bill would require the board to provide or arrange for the provision of a Healthy Action Incentives and Rewards Program, as specified, to all enrollees. The bill would also authorize the Public Employees’ Retirement System, the Medi-Cal program, and the Healthy Families Program to provide or arrange for the provision of an electronic personal health record meeting specified requirements for enrollees receiving health care benefits, to the extent that funds are appropriated for that purpose. The bill would require that system or software that pertains to the personal health record to adhere to accepted
national standards for interoperability, privacy, and data exchange, or be certified by a nationally recognized certifying body, and comply with applicable state and federal confidentiality and data security requirements.
(20) Existing law provides for the Office of Statewide Health Planning and Development, which has specified powers and duties. Existing law requires the office to publish specified reports.
This bill would require the office to publish risk-adjusted outcome reports for percutaneous coronary interventions, commencing January 1, 2010, and would require the office to establish a clinical data collection program to collect data on percutaneous coronary interventions and establish by regulation the data to be reported by each hospital.
This bill would also create the Health Care Cost and Quality Transparency Committee to be composed of 7 members
to be appointed by the Governor, the Senate Committee on Rules, and the Speaker of the Assembly, as specified. The bill would require the committee to meet at least monthly and to, within one year of its first meeting, develop and present to the Secretary of California Health and Human Services a health care cost quality and transparency plan consisting of specified strategies in order to, among other things, assist in efforts to reduce health care costs in the health care system. The bill would provide for the abolition of the committee on January 1, 2011.
The bill would also require that a lead agency, as defined, provide administrative support to the committee. The bill would specify the authority and responsibilities of the lead agency, including, but not limited to, the responsibility to determine the data to be collected and the authority to appoint advisory committees and to contract with a qualified agency or public academic institution, as specified. The
bill would require the lead agency to provide the Secretary of California Health and Human Services with a proposal that would identify possible financial resources to implement these provisions.
(21) Existing law requires the governing board of any school district to make rules for the physical examination of pupils that will ensure proper care of the pupils and proper secrecy with regard to any defects noted.
This bill would authorize each school district, on and after January 1, 2010, to provide an information sheet developed by the State Department of Education, in consultation with the State Department of Health Care Services and the Managed Risk Medical Insurance Board, to the parent or legal guardian of specified pupils. The information sheet would be required to include, among other information, an explanation of the minimum health care coverage requirements imposed by this act, as
specified.
(22) This bill would give the Director of Health Care Services, in consultation with the Department of Finance, authority to take various actions as necessary to implement the bill, including promoting flexibility of implementation and maximizing federal financial participation. The bill would require the director to notify the Chair of the Joint Legislative Budget Committee prior to exercising this flexibility. The bill would declare the intent of the Legislature to implement the bill to harmonize and best effectuate the purposes and intent of the bill.
(23) The bill would make its provisions operative upon the date that the Director of Finance files a finding with the Secretary of State that, among other circumstances, sufficient state resources will exist to implement those provisions. The bill would also require the director to transmit that finding to the Chief
Clerk of the Assembly, the Secretary of the Senate, and the chairs of the appropriate committees of the Legislature at least 90 days prior to implementation of its provisions. The bill would express the Legislature’s intent that the act’s provisions be financed by contributions from public and private sources, including fees paid by acute care hospitals and by employers.
(24) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that with regard to certain mandates no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
With regard to any other mandates, this bill would provide that, if the Commission on State Mandates determines that the bill contains costs
so mandated by the state, reimbursement for those costs shall be made pursuant to the statutory provisions noted above.