Amended
IN
Senate
May 01, 2007 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 11, 2007 |
Introduced by
Senator
Correa |
February 23, 2007 |
Existing
NOTICE OF AIRPORT IN VICINITY | |
---|---|
This property is presently located in the vicinity of an airport, within what is known as an airport influence area. For that reason, the property may be subject to some of the annoyances or inconveniences associated with proximity to airport operations (for example: noise, vibration, or odors). Individual sensitivities to those annoyances can vary from person to person. You may wish to consider what airport annoyances, if any, are associated with the property before you complete your purchase and determine whether they are acceptable to you. |
(17)
The Legislature finds and declares the following:
(a)Transfer fees based on a percentage of the sales price of a home are increasingly being imposed by developers on home buyers. Often, the imposition of these fees is used to settle disputes between builders and parties who are opposed to a development or, in the alternative, by builders to avoid proactively a lawsuit by these opponents or to smooth development negotiations with the local government. Typically, in return for an agreement by the opponents to the development to not pursue a lawsuit based on one of the state’s environmental protection acts, the builder agrees to the imposition of one or more fees through a covenant that remains in effect through each sale of a home.
(b)Fees totaling 1.75 percent of a home’s sales price have been seen; however, there is no upper limit on the percentage of a home’s sales price at which a transfer fee can be established.
(c)Purchasing a home is increasingly beyond the reach of many Californians and these fees make housing even less affordable. Today, less than a quarter of all first-time home buyers can afford a median priced home in California.
(d)These transfer fees can be imposed for an unlimited period. Generally, the duration of these transfer fees ranges from 20 to 25 years, however many fees are imposed in perpetuity. Consequently, future generations will be saddled with paying fees established decades earlier by developers.
(e)The funds generated by these transfer fees can be
used to pay for projects that do not directly benefit the development or the immediately surrounding community. As a result, the homeowners that pay these fees do not receive any benefit whatsoever in return.
(f)The number of transfer fees that can be imposed is unlimited. Multiple fees have been imposed by developers on each home in a development with each fee funding a different purported benefit. Future homeowners will be required to pay these fees without any say as to whether the recipients of the funds should continue to benefit from this revenue source.
(g)The requirements for disclosing the existence of a transfer fee are limited. In addition, the requirement for payment of the fee can be masked by it not applying to the first buyer but only to subsequent buyers. Consequently, many home buyers may be surprised to learn of the additional thousands of dollars that they
will be required to pay upon the close of escrow.
(h)The organizations or developers that receive the transfer fee funds are not required to account to any independent oversight entity. Therefore, the public has no assurances that these organizations will work to achieve the goals with which they have been entrusted.
(i)The transfer fees threaten a number of established public policies, namely:
(1)The prohibition on the restraint of alienation. The fees will make it more difficult for homeowners to sell their homes because home buyers will likely balk at paying the fees.
(2)The taxing and spending authority reserved to local governments. The imposition of these fees by developers arguably usurps functions that properly belong exclusively to local
government. Moreover, no public vote is required to impose or extend the fee.
(j)Based on the foregoing, The Legislature finds that the imposition of transfer fees shall be prohibited.
(a)Conditions restraining alienation, when repugnant to the interest created, are void.
(b)Except as provided in subdivision (c), a condition restraining alienation that is repugnant to the interest created includes, but is not limited to, a covenant, restriction, or condition contained in any deed, contract, security instrument, or other instrument affecting the transfer or sale of, or any interest in, real property that contains a requirement that any transferee pay a fee upon transfer of the real property, unless the requirement was in effect on or before December 31, 2007.
(c)Subdivision (b) does not apply to any of the following:
(1)Fees or taxes imposed by a governmental entity.
(2)Mechanics’ liens.
(3)Court ordered transfers, payments, or judgments.
(4)Property agreements in connection with a legal separation or dissolution of marriage.
(5)Fees, charges, or payments in connection with the administration of estates or trusts pursuant to Division 7 (commencing with Section 7000), Division 8 (commencing with Section 13000), or Division 9
(commencing with Section 15000) of the Probate Code.
(6)Fees, charges, or payments imposed by lenders or purchasers of loans, as these entities are described in subdivision (c) of Section 10232 of the Business and Professions Code.
(7)Any assessment, penalty, or fee authorized by the Davis-Stirling Common Interest Development Act (Title
6 (commencing with Section 1350) of Part 4).