Amended
IN
Assembly
August 14, 2006 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
August 22, 2005 |
Amended
IN
Assembly
July 12, 2005 |
Amended
IN
Senate
May 03, 2005 |
Amended
IN
Senate
April 04, 2005 |
Introduced by
Senator
Soto |
February 17, 2005 |
(1)Under existing law, the Public Utilities Commission has regulatory authority over public utilities, including electrical corporations. Existing law authorizes the commission to fix the rates and charges for every public utility, and requires that those rates and charges be just and reasonable. Existing law requires electrical corporations furnishing electricity to an agricultural producer to prepare and file tariffs providing for optional off-peak demand service, including the availability of time-differentiating meters or other measurement devices.
This bill would, with certain exceptions, prohibit the commission from
requiring the installation of advanced metering infrastructure, as defined, for any building constructed prior to January 1, 2006, and occupied by a customer with average annual electricity usage of less than 1,000 kilowatthours per month, unless the commission first evaluates certain factors, as specified.
(2)Under existing law, a violation of the Public Utilities Act or an order or direction of the commission is a crime.
Because the provisions of this bill would be a part of the act and a violation of any of those provisions would be a crime, the
bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.
(3)The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:
(a)The Public Utilities Commission is currently considering authorizing or requiring electrical corporations to install advanced metering infrastructure (AMI) for their customers, including all existing residential and small commercial customers, regardless of their size or location.
(b)Electrical corporations have already requested over one hundred twenty million dollars ($120,000,000) to spend in 2005 in order to prepare to install AMI in early 2006.
(c)The entire statewide cost of AMI installation is estimated at several billion dollars.
(d)The commission has not conducted any evidentiary hearings to determine whether universal installation of AMI for small customers will be cost effective for those customers.
(a)For purposes of this section, “advanced metering infrastructure” means interval data recording meters, along with two‑way communications and any other equipment necessary for the installation and operation of the meters.
(b)Except as provided in Sections 353.3 and 393, the commission shall not require the installation of advanced metering infrastructure for any building constructed prior to January 1, 2006, and occupied by a customer with annual average usage of less than 1,000 kilowatthours per month, unless it first evaluates the following:
(1)The effect on average annual electricity rates for residential and small commercial customer classes for every year of repayment for the AMI investment.
(2)The bill impacts of any proposed mandatory time‑differentiated rates on residential customers in hot climate zones.
(3)The amount of peak load reduction contrasted with other demand reduction program alternatives.
(4)The feasibility and cost effectiveness of partial deployment in selected zones contrasted with deployment throughout an entire service territory of an electrical corporation.