(1) Existing provisions of the California Constitution require the Governor to submit annually to the Legislature, and prescribe procedures for the Legislature to enact and send to the Governor, a Budget Bill for each fiscal year.
This measure would provide that if, following the enactment of the annual Budget Bill, the Governor determines that General Fund revenues are anticipated to decline substantially below the estimate of General Fund revenues upon which the Budget Bill was based, as described below, or that General Fund expenditures are anticipated to increase substantially above that estimate of General Fund revenues, or both, the Governor may issue a proclamation declaring a fiscal emergency, which would identify the nature of the fiscal emergency and be accompanied by proposed legislation to address the fiscal emergency. It would provide that if the Legislature fails to pass and send to the Governor a bill or bills to address the fiscal emergency by the 45th day following the issuance of the proclamation, the Legislature may not act on any other bills, nor may the Legislature adjourn for a joint recess, until that bill or those bills have been passed and sent to the Governor. It would specify that a bill addressing the fiscal emergency shall be passed by a majority vote and take effect immediately, notwithstanding constitutional provisions that otherwise require a 2/3 vote for the enactment of an urgency statute or of a statute making certain appropriations from the General Fund.
(2) Existing provisions of the California Constitution require the Governor to submit to the Legislature a budget, as specified.
This measure would prohibit the Legislature from sending to the Governor for consideration, and the Governor from signing into law, a Budget Bill that would appropriate from the General Fund, for that fiscal year, a total amount that, combined with all appropriations from the General Fund for that fiscal year made as of the date of the Budget Bill’s passage, exceeds the estimate of General Fund revenues, as specified, for that fiscal year.
(3) Existing provisions of the California Constitution require the Legislature to establish a prudent state reserve fund in an amount the Legislature deems reasonable and necessary.
This measure would, in addition, establish the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund in the State Treasury and would require the Controller, commencing on July 15 of each fiscal year, to transfer from the General Fund to the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund a specified amount of any excess General Fund revenues, as defined, for that fiscal year. The measure would prohibit the Legislature, except as specified, from appropriating moneys from the Budget Stabilization Reserve Fund in a fiscal year for which there are excess revenues in the General Fund, except to pay the principal, interest, or both, on bonded indebtedness incurred under the measure described below, or to address a fiscal imbalance, as described, that is declared by the Governor.
(4) Existing provisions of the California Constitution prohibit the creation by the Legislature of debts in excess of $300,000 except for a single object or work specified in a law creating the debt, which is approved by a2/3 vote of the members of each house of the Legislature and approved by the people by a majority of the votes cast at a general or direct primary election.
This measure would, for the purposes of those provisions, define a “single object or work,” for which the Legislature may create a debt or liability in excess of $300,000 subject to those requirements, to include the funding of an accumulated state budget deficit, as defined, and to the extent, and in the amount, that funding is authorized in a specified measure submitted to the voters at the March 2, 2004, statewide primary election. The measure would dedicate specified sales and use tax revenues to the repayment of that bonded indebtedness, and provide that those revenues are not General Fund moneys for purposes of the constitutional requirements of funding for school districts and community college districts.
(5) This measure would provide that its provisions would become operative only if the specified measure authorizing debt issuance is submitted to and approved by the voters at the March 2, 2004, statewide primary election.