(1) Existing law provides that a school district is eligible to receive an apportionment for modernization of permanent school buildings over 25 years old or portable classrooms that are at least 20 years old and sets forth the manner in which the amount of funding a school district is eligible for is calculated.
This bill would allow an additional apportionment to be made for the modernization of permanent school facilities every 25 years following the date of the previous apportionment and, in the case of portable classrooms, every 20 years after the previous apportionment is made.
This bill would require the board, for a portable classroom that is eligible for a second modernization, to require a school district to use the modernization funds to replace the portable classroom and to certify that the existing eligible portable classroom will be removed from any classroom use, unless the school district is able to document that modernizing the portable classroom is a better use of public resources.
(2) Existing law authorizes the board to provide a grant to fund joint-use projects to construct a facility on a schoolsite if the school district demonstrates that the project meets specified criteria, including that the joint-use project is part of an application for new construction funding.
This bill would, instead, provide that joint-use funding may be provided to a joint-use project to either reconfigure existing school buildings or construct new school buildings, or both, to improve pupil achievement, only if the plans for the facility were accepted for review and approval by the department prior to January 1, 2004.
(3) Existing law conditions eligibility for a joint-use grant on, among other things, demonstration by a school district that it has a joint-use partner that has agreed to provide matching funds for 50% of the eligible costs, as specified.
This bill would require the joint-use agreement to specify the contribution to be made by the school district and the joint-use partner toward the local share and would require the contribution of the joint-use partner to be no less than 25% of the eligible project costs.
(4) Existing law establishes a pilot program to determine the optimum method for providing school facilities funding for charter schools.
This bill would delete the reference to those provisions as being a pilot program.
(5) Existing law further requires the California School Finance Authority, in consultation with the State Allocation Board, to establish a process to be used for the release of funds for that program.
This bill would instead require the State Allocation Board to establish that process.
(6) Existing law provides for submission to the voters of the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Acts of 2002 and 2004 which would, in part, authorize the issuance of bonds for the purpose of funding K-12 school facilities, including, but not limited to, charter school facilities pursuant to the Leroy F. Greene School Facilities Act of 1998 (Greene Act). Existing law also sets forth the manner of funding charter school facilities under the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2002 including, among other provisions, that the State Allocation Board and the California School Finance Authority provide funding for charter school facilities pursuant to that act.
This bill would set forth the manner of funding charter school facilities under the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, including, among other provisions, the authority for the State Allocation Board and the California School Finance Authority to provide funding for charter school facilities projects.
(7) Existing law requires the board, in consultation with the authority, to approve projects and make preliminary apportionments only to financially sound applicants, as specified.
This bill would require the board to maximize the number of projects that may be approved by adopting total per project funding caps and would require the board to adopt other funding limits including, but not limited to, limits on the amount of acreage and construction funding for each project. The bill would require the construction funding limits to include, but not be limited to, consideration of savings due to retrofitting existing buildings, joint-use projects, or other factors.
(8) Existing law requires the board, in consultation with the authority, to adopt regulations to implement the funding requirements for charter school facilities.
This bill would permit the board to adopt, amend, or repeal rules and regulations pursuant to this chapter as emergency regulations and would state that until July 1, 2004, the adoption, amendment, or repeal of these regulations is conclusively presumed to be necessary for the immediate preservation of the public peace, health, safety, or general welfare, as specified. The bill would further require the State Allocation Board and the California School Finance Authority to jointly report to the Legislature by July 1, 2005, regarding the implementation of the charter schools facilities funding program, including, but not limited to, a description of the projects funded pursuant to the law governing charter schools from the Kindergarten-University Public Education Facilities Bond Act of 2004, a description of the process whereby the board provides funding for charter school facilities under provisions of the Greene Act, other than those governing charter schools, and recommendations, if any, regarding statutory changes needed to facilitate and streamline this process.
(9) This bill would make technical and conforming changes.