Existing law establishes a procedure pursuant to which backstretch employees working for a licensed trainer or horseman in the horse racing industry may join a labor organization for purposes of collective bargaining with their employers. It authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to order the parties to engage in good faith negotiations for employment agreements on an individual employer basis and to participate in mandatory mediation if no agreement is reached. If an impasse is declared the board may appoint an arbitrator to determine the issues and issue a binding order. Existing law authorizes specified disputes to be adjudicated by the stewards, who have the authority to order any remedy therefor, and authorizes the California Horse Racing Board to require the parties to submit to binding arbitration subject to judicial review.
This bill would provide a mediation procedure applicable to specified agricultural employers and a labor organization certified as the exclusive bargaining agent of a bargaining unit of agricultural employees. It would permit either party to file with the Agricultural Labor Relations Board, following a specified period, a declaration that the parties have failed to reach a collective bargaining agreement. It would require the board, upon receipt of a declaration pursuant to this procedure, to immediately issue an order directing the parties to mandatory mediation and conciliation of the issues for a specified period.
This bill would require the mediator, if the parties do not resolve the issues to their mutual satisfaction, to certify that the mediation process has been exhausted. It would require the mediator to issue a report that determines all unresolved issues and establishes the final terms of a collective bargaining agreement.
This bill would permit either party, within a specified period, to petition the board to review the mediator’s report, and would permit the board to accept for review only those portions of a petition that establish a prima facie case of grounds therefor, as specified. It would require the board, if it does not accept a petition for review, to issue an order confirming the mediator’s report and order it into immediate effect. It would require the board, if it finds grounds to grant review, to order the provisions of the report that are not the subject of the petition for review into effect as a final order of the board. If the board does not accept a petition for review the mediator’s report would become the final order of the board.
This bill would require the board to issue a decision concerning the petition and under specified conditions to issue an order requiring modification of the collective bargaining agreement in the mediator’s report. It would require the mediator to meet with the parties for an additional mediation period and, at the end of this mediation period, to prepare a 2nd report resolving any outstanding issues, and to file it with the board.
This bill would permit either party within a specified period after the issuance of the mediator’s 2nd report, to petition the board for a review of the mediator’s 2nd report. If no petition is filed, the mediator’s report would take immediate effect as a final order of the board. If a petition is filed, the board would be required to issue an order confirming the mediator’s report and order it into immediate effect, unless it finds that the report is subject to review on any of the grounds specified by this bill, in which case the board shall determine the issues and shall order the mediator’s report, as modified by the board, into immediate effect as a final order of the board. It would permit the board to set aside the mediator’s report on specified grounds.
This bill would permit either party, within a specified period after the mediator’s report takes effect, to file an action to enforce the provisions of the mediator’s report, as specified. It would also permit either party, within a specified period after the mediator’s report takes effect, to petition for a writ of review in the court of appeal or the California Supreme Court for a writ of review, and would specify the basis for review by the court.