(1) Existing law, until January 1, 2003, establishes the Educational Telecommunication Fund in order for the governing board of the County Office Fiscal Crisis and Management Assistance Team to carry out its responsibilities regarding the establishment of telecommunications standards to support the efficient sharing of school business and administrative information.
This bill would change the date upon which the Educational Telecommunication Fund becomes inoperative to January 1, 2004.
(2) Existing law requires, for the 1990–91 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, that moneys to be applied by the state for the support of school districts and community college districts be distributed in accordance with certain calculations. This provision does not apply to the fiscal years between the 1992–93 fiscal year and the 2001–02 fiscal year, inclusive.
This bill would, instead, make this provision inapplicable to the fiscal years between the 1992–93 fiscal year and the 2002–03 fiscal year, inclusive.
(3) Existing law requires the county superintendent of schools to adjust the total revenue limit for each school district in the jurisdiction of the county superintendent of schools by the amount of increased or decreased employer contributions to the Public Employees’ Retirement System (PERS) and sets forth a method for calculating that amount for the 1995–96 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter. Existing law provides that funding appropriated in the Budget Act of 2001, or legislation amending that act, for the purpose of limiting reductions to revenue limits for the 2001–02 fiscal year is to be allocated on a one-time basis. Existing law appropriates $35,000,000 from the General Fund to Section A of the State School Fund for purposes of limiting the reductions to revenue limits for the 2003–04 fiscal year and limits reductions to revenue limits for the 2004–05 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter to $35,000,000 increased annually by cost-of-living adjustments, as specified.
This bill would provide that funding appropriated in the Budget Act of 2002 for the purpose of limiting reductions to revenue limits for the 2002–03 fiscal year is to be allocated on a one-time basis and that total allocations for this purpose may not exceed $36,000,000.
(4) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to compute an equalization adjustment for the 2001–02 fiscal year for each school district, so that no district’s prior year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance is less than the prior year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance above which fall not more than 10% of the total statewide units of average daily attendance for the appropriate size and type of district.
This bill would require the superintendent also to compute an equalization adjustment for the 2002–03 fiscal year, so that no district’s prior year adjusted base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance is less than the prior year adjusted base revenue limit above which fall not more than 10% of the total statewide units of average daily attendance for the appropriate size and type of district.
(5) Existing law, the Fairness in Education Funding Act, requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction to compute an equalization adjustment for the 2003–04 fiscal year for each school district, so that no district’s prior year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance is less than the prior year base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance above which fall not more than 10% of the total statewide units of average daily attendance for the appropriate size and type of district.
This bill would require the superintendent to also compute an equalization adjustment for the 2003–04 fiscal year, so that no district’s prior year adjusted base revenue limit per unit of average daily attendance is less than the prior year adjusted base revenue limit above which fall not more than 8.25% of the total statewide units of average daily attendance for the appropriate size and type of district. The bill would provide a formula for calculating the adjusted base revenue limit and would require the average daily attendance of a charter school to be included in calculating the size of, and target amounts for, a school district that is a chartering agency.
(6) This bill would provide that if the appropriations made for purposes of the equalization adjustments are insufficient to provide funding equal to the amounts computed by the equalization formulas, the amounts appropriated shall be allocated to school districts on a pro rata basis.
(7) This bill would appropriate $406,000,000 from the General Fund to the Superintendent of Public Instruction for the 2003–04 fiscal year, pursuant to a schedule, for purposes of the equalization adjustments, to be allocated to school districts on a pro rata basis.
The bill would require the appropriation to be included in the amounts appropriated by the state in the 2003–04 fiscal year for purposes of meeting the state’s minimum funding obligation to school districts and community college districts under Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution for that fiscal year.
(8) Existing law authorizes the governing board of a school district to terminate the services of certificated employees during the time period between 5 days after the enactment of the Budget Act and August 15 of the fiscal year to which the Budget Act applies, according to a schedule of notice and hearing adopted by the governing board, if the district determines that its revenue limit has not increased by 2% more and it is necessary, therefore, to decrease the district’s permanent employees.
This bill would make this provision inoperative from July 1, 2002, to July 1, 2003, inclusive.
(9) Existing law establishes, until July 1, 2006, the Principal Training Program to provide incentive funding to provide schoolsite administrators with instruction and training and requires1/3 of a local education agency’s schoolsite administrators be trained in each of the 3 years of program implementation.
This bill would instead require that 50% of the schoolsite administrators be trained in each of the 2002–03 and 2003–04 fiscal years.
(10) Existing law requires the Director of Finance to make certain computations annually regarding charter school block grant funding and to provide that information as part of the May revision to the Governor’s Budget.
This bill would instead require the Director of Finance to make that computation, as specified, and provide that information to the Superintendent of Public Instruction within 30 days of the enactment of the annual Budget Act.
(11) Existing law establishes the Kindergarten Readiness Pilot Program, to be implemented in the 2002–03 school year, and requires a participating school district to offer admission to 1st grade at the beginning of the school year, or at a later time in the same school year, only to children who will have their 6th birthday on or before September 1 of that school year.
This bill would delay the implementation of that program until the 2003–04 school year and make conforming changes.
(12) Existing law establishes the Digital High School Education Technology Grant Program to provide one-time installation grants and ongoing technology support and staff training grants to school districts and county offices of education for projects at high schools. Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, commencing in the second fiscal year following the year in which a high school receives a technology installation grant and upon certification of completion of the installation project, to allocate to each high school an annual technology support and staff training grant.
This bill would specify that technology support and staff training grants would not be provided to school districts and county offices of education for the 2002–03 fiscal year and would prohibit the Superintendent of Public Instruction from allocating those grants for the 2002–03 fiscal year. The bill would state the intent of the Legislature that the funding that would otherwise have been provided for the 2002–03 fiscal year be provided in the 2003–04 fiscal year.
(13) Existing law requires the Secretary for Education to contract for development and establishment of a public involvement campaign to inform Californians that promoting reading in the public schools as a key to success in life is the responsibility of all Californians.
This bill would make the provision subject to funding being appropriated in the annual Budget Act for this purpose.
(14) Existing law establishes the Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant Program and requires the amount of a school district’s grant to be adjusted for inflation.
This bill would provide that commencing with the 2001–02 fiscal year, and each fiscal year thereafter, the total amount a school district shall receive in any fiscal year is at a minimum the same total amount it received in the 2000–01 fiscal year adjusted annually for inflation.
(15) Existing law combines the funding for court-ordered desegregation programs and for voluntary integration programs in the Targeted Instructional Improvement Grant Program and calculates a per pupil amount of funding for school districts based on the amounts received in the 2000–01 fiscal year for court-ordered desegregation and voluntary integration claims.
This bill would require the Superintendent of Public Instruction, commencing with the 2001–02 fiscal year, to calculate an apportionment of state funds for a basic aid district that was entitled to reimbursement pursuant to repealed provisions regarding court-ordered voluntary pupil transfer programs and that received an apportionment under the repealed provisions because a court order directs pupils to transfer to that district as part of the court-ordered voluntary pupil transfer program. The amount of the apportionment would be 70% of the district revenue limit that would have been apportioned to the school district from which the pupils were transferred.
(16) Existing law requires the Superintendent of Public Instruction, for purposes of calculating funding for each special education local plan area, to determine the statewide total average daily attendance for the 2000–01 fiscal year, to increase the amount per unit of average daily attendance for the 2001–02 fiscal year by a specified quotient, and to increase the statewide target per unit of average daily attendance for the 2001–02 fiscal year, as provided.
This bill would require that determination and those increases also to be made for the 2001–02 and 2002–03 fiscal years, respectively, and would make conforming changes.
(17) Existing law establishes the Governor’s Teaching Fellowships Program and provides, beginning in the 2001–02 fiscal year, for 1,000 nonrenewable graduate teaching fellowships to be awarded annually in the amount of $20,000 each.
This bill would provide that commencing with the 2002–03 fiscal year and each fiscal year thereafter, the number of fellowships awarded shall be determined pursuant to an appropriation in the annual Budget Act for this purpose.
(18) Existing law establishes, until July 1, 2005, the Mathematics and Reading Professional Development Program, under which a local education agency, as defined, receives incentive funding to provide training in mathematics and reading to teachers and also to provide training to instructional aides and paraprofessionals, as defined, who directly assist with classroom instruction in mathematics and reading, through professional development programs conducted by institutions of higher education or an approved provider of training.
This bill would extend the program until July 1, 2006, and would reduce the number of teachers, instructional aides, and paraprofessionals for whom a local education agency may receive an incentive award.
(19) Under existing law, a local agency may not be required to implement or give effect to any statute or executive order during any fiscal year and for the period immediately following that fiscal year for which the Budget Act has not been enacted for the subsequent fiscal year if specified conditions are met. Existing law excepts from that provision, any state-mandated local program for which reimbursement funding counts toward the minimum General Fund requirements of Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution.
This bill would specify that a school district may not be required to implement or give effect to the School Bus Safety II mandate statutes and the School Crimes Reporting II mandate statutes if certain conditions are met.
(20) Existing law, the Bronzan-McCorquodale Act, organizes and finances community mental health services for the mentally disordered in every county through locally administered and locally controlled community mental health programs and states the intent of the Legislature that certain funding provisions related to financing community mental health services not affect the responsibilities to fund psychotherapy and other mental health services for handicapped and disabled pupils that are required by law.
This bill would prohibit the funding provisions related to financing community mental health services from affecting the responsibility of the state to fund psychotherapy and other mental health services for handicapped and disabled pupils required by law and would require the state to reimburse counties for all allowable costs incurred by counties in providing those services to handicapped and disabled pupils. The bill would require the state to provide reimbursement for those services through an appropriation included in either the annual Budget Act or other statute. The bill would provide that counties are not required to provide any share of those costs or to fund the cost of any part of these services with money received from the Local Revenue Fund for reimbursement claims for services delivered in the 2001–02 fiscal year and thereafter to handicapped and disabled pupils.
The bill would provide that county reimbursement claims submitted to the Controller for reimbursement for services associated with providing allowable mental health treatment services required by an individualized education program in fiscal years up to and including the 2000–01 fiscal year are not subject to dispute by the Controller’s office regarding the percentage of reimbursement claimed by any county. The bill would prohibit a county that previously submitted a reimbursement claim for services delivered in the 2000–01 fiscal year or prior for less than 100% of the allowable mental health treatment services to special education pupils from amending its claim for a higher percentage of those same allowable costs.
(21) This bill would set the cost-of-living adjustment for certain items contained in the Budget Act of 2002 and for revenue limit determinations at 2%.
(22) This bill would require the Commission on State Mandates, to amend the parameters and guidelines of the School Bus Safety II mandate to specify that costs associated with implementation of transportation plans are not reimbursable claims and would require the amended parameters and guidelines to be applied retroactively as well as prospectively.
(23) The Budget Act of 2002 makes various appropriations for the support of the public elementary and secondary schools for the 2002–03 fiscal year.
This bill would revise the Budget Act of 2002 by augmenting certain appropriations, by reducing certain appropriations, and by making a new appropriation, as provided.
(24) This bill would appropriate $681,000,000 from the General Fund in the 2003–04 fiscal year to the State Department of Education pursuant to a schedule for specified school improvement programs, for home to school transportation, for targeted instructional improvement grants, and for other supplemental grants, as specified. The funds appropriated by this bill would be applied toward the minimum funding requirements for school districts and community college districts imposed by Section 8 of Article XVI of the California Constitution for the 2003–04 fiscal year.
(25) Existing law requires the Controller to draw warrants on the State Treasury from the State School Fund in favor of the county treasurer of each county in each month in certain amounts determined pursuant to specified calculations. Existing law requires warrants in the months of September to November, inclusive, to include one-tenth of the estimated total amounts of the special purpose apportionment. Under existing law, warrants in December are required to include one-tenth of the amounts certified by the Superintendent of Public Instruction as the special purpose apportionment, as adjusted, if necessary, to correct excesses or deficiencies in the estimates made for purposes of the warrants issued in September to November, inclusive. Existing law requires an additional one-tenth apportionment to be included in the warrants for January to June, inclusive.
This bill would apply that formula for purposes of apportioning funds from the State School Fund for economic impact aid programs as part of the special purpose apportionment in the 2002–03 fiscal year. The bill would apply a revised formula, based on a one-seventh apportionment, for purposes of apportioning funds from the State School Fund for home to school transportation programs as part of the special purpose apportionment in the 2002–03 fiscal year.
(26) The California Constitution requires that the amount appropriated by the Legislature for the support of school districts, as defined, and community college districts in any fiscal year be not less than a specified amount and authorizes the suspension of this minimum funding obligation for one year.
This bill would require the state’s minimum funding obligation for the support of school districts, as defined, and community college districts to be increased, as specified, for the 2003–04 fiscal year. If the state’s minimum funding obligation for the support of school districts, as defined, and community college districts is suspended, the bill would require the amount of the maintenance factor to be computed in a manner that includes this increase.
(27) This bill would declare that it is to take effect immediately as an urgency statute.