Bill Text

Bill Information


Add To My Favorites | print page

AB-2329 Health facilities: plans of correction.(2001-2002)

SHARE THIS: share this bill in Facebook share this bill in Twitter
AB2329:v98#DOCUMENT

Amended  IN  Assembly  May 09, 2002

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2001–2002 REGULAR SESSION

Assembly Bill
No. 2329


Introduced  by  Assembly Member Florez

February 21, 2002


An act to amend Section 1280 of the Health and Safety Code, relating to health facilities.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


AB 2329, as amended, Florez. Health facilities: plans of correction.
Existing law provides that the State Department of Health Services may provide consulting services upon request to a health facility to assist in the identification or correction of deficiencies or the upgrading of the quality of the care provided by the health facility.
Existing law also requires that the department notify the health facility of all deficiencies in its compliance with specified requirements and that the department and the health facility prepare a plan of correction for fixing these deficiencies. If the health facility fails to implement a plan of correction that has been agreed upon by both the health facility and the department within a reasonable time, the department may order implementation of the plan of correction.
Existing law bars the introduction as evidence in a legal action or administrative proceeding the act of providing a plan of correction, the content of the plan of correction, or the execution of a plan of correction to prove an admission by the health facility, its licensee, or personnel of the violation that led the plan to be developed.
This bill would limit the health facilities to which the above, and related provisions apply. The bill would provide that the plan is admissible in a legal action or administrative proceeding if it is probative on an issue other than as an admission by the health facility, its licensee, or personnel of the violation that led the plan to be developed.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NO  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 1280 of the Health and Safety Code is amended to read:

1280.
 (a) (1) The state department may provide consulting services upon request to any health facility listed in paragraph (2) to assist in the identification or correction of deficiencies or the upgrading of the quality of care provided by the health facility.
(2) For purposes of this section, “health facility” means any of the following:
(A) Skilled nursing facilities, as defined in subdivision (c) of Section 1250.
(B) Intermediate care facilities, as defined in subdivision (d) of Section 1250.
(C) Intermediate care facilities/developmentally disabled habilitative, as defined in subdivision (e) of Section 1250.
(D) Intermediate care facilities/developmentally disabled, as defined in subdivision (g) of Section 1250.
(E) Intermediate care facilities/developmentally disabled—nursing, as defined in subdivision (h) of Section 1250.
(F) Home health agencies, as defined in subdivision (a) of Section 1727.
(b) The state department shall notify the health facility of all deficiencies in its compliance with this chapter and the rules and regulations adopted hereunder, and the health facility shall agree with the state department upon a plan of correction that shall give the health facility a reasonable time to correct these deficiencies. If at the end of the allotted time, as revealed by inspection, the health facility has failed to correct the deficiencies, the director may take action to revoke or suspend the license.

(c)(1)In addition to subdivision (a), if the health facility is licensed under subdivision (a), (b), or (f) of Section 1250, and if the

(c) (1) In addition to subdivision (a), if the health facility fails to implement a plan of correction that has been agreed upon by both the facility and the state department within a reasonable time, the state department may order implementation of the plan of correction previously agreed upon by the facility and the state department. If the facility and the state department fail to agree upon a plan of correction within a reasonable time and if the deficiency poses an immediate and substantial hazard to the health or safety of patients, then the director may take action to order implementation of a plan of correction devised by the state department. The order shall be in writing and shall contain a statement of the reasons for the order. If the facility does not agree that the deficiency poses an immediate and substantial hazard to the health or safety of patients or if the facility believes that the plan of correction will not correct the hazard, or if the facility proposes a more efficient or effective means of remedying the deficiency, the facility may, within 10 days of receiving the plan of correction from the department, appeal the order to the director. The director shall review information provided by the facility, the department, and other affected parties and within a reasonable time render a decision in writing that shall include a statement of reasons for the order. During the period which the director is reviewing the appeal, the order to implement the plan of correction shall be stayed. The opportunity for appeal provided pursuant to this subdivision shall not be deemed to be an adjudicative hearing and is not required to comply with Section 100171.

(2)If any condition within a health facility licensed under subdivision (a), (b), or (f) of Section 1250 poses an immediate and

(2) If any condition within a health facility poses an immediate substantial hazard to the health or safety of patients, the state department may order either of the following until the hazardous condition is corrected:
(A) Reduction in the number of patients.
(B) Closure of the unit or units within the facility that pose the risk. If the unit to be closed is an emergency room in a designated facility, as defined in Section 1797.67, the state department shall notify and coordinate with the local emergency medical services agency.
(3) The facility may appeal an order pursuant to paragraph (2) by appealing to the superior court of the county in which the facility is located.
(4) Paragraph (2) shall not apply to a deficiency for which the facility was cited prior to January 1, 1994.
(d) Reports on the results of each inspection of a health facility shall be prepared by the inspector or inspector team and shall be kept on file in the state department along with the plan of correction and health facility comments. The inspection report may include a recommendation for reinspection. Inspection reports of an intermediate care facility/developmentally disabled habilitative or an intermediate care facility/developmentally disabled—nursing shall be provided by the state department to the appropriate regional center pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 4620) of Division 4.5 of the Welfare and Institutions Code.
(e) All inspection reports and lists of deficiencies shall be open to public inspection when the state department has received verification that the health facility has received the report from the state department. All plans of correction shall be open to public inspection upon receipt by the state department.
(f) In no event shall the act of providing a plan of correction, the content of the plan of correction, or the execution of a plan of correction, be used in any legal action or administrative proceeding as an admission within the meaning of Sections 1220 to 1227, inclusive, of the Evidence Code against the health facility, its licensee, or its personnel. However, a plan of correction shall be admissible in any legal action or administrative proceeding if the plan is probative on an issue other than as an admission by the health facility, its licensee, or its personnel, of the violation that led the plan of correction to be developed. The court, in circumstances that it deems appropriate, shall make appropriate limiting instructions to the trier of fact that the admission of a plan of correction cannot be used to prove the violation that led the plan to be developed.