(1) The existing California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act requires a distributor of specified beverage containers to pay a redemption payment of 2¢ to the Department of Conservation, for each beverage container, as defined, sold or transferred, for deposit in the California Beverage Container Recycling Fund and provides for an increase in that payment, as specified. The money in the fund is continuously appropriated to the department to pay refund values, processing payments, and for other purposes. “Beverage” is defined, for purposes of the act, to include beer and other malt beverages, wine and distilled spirit coolers, carbonated mineral and soda waters, and similar carbonated soft drinks in liquid form that are intended for human consumption, but excludes from that definition 100% fruit juice to which carbonation has been added.
A violation of the act is a crime and the penalties for violations of the act are deposited in the fund.
Existing law requires each glass container manufacturer to use a 35% minimum percentage of California postfilled glass in the manufacturing of glass food, drink, or beverage containers. A manufacturer is authorized to seek a reduction or waiver of this requirement from the department.
This bill would additionally include as beverages, for purposes of the act, carbonated and noncarbonated water, noncarbonated soft drinks and sport drinks, specified noncarbonated fruit drinks, coffee and tea drinks, and carbonated fruit drinks if those products are sold in plastic, glass, bimetal, or aluminum containers in liquid, ready-to-drink form and intended for human consumption. The bill would exempt any beverage container included within the coverage of the act on January 1, 2000, from specified labeling requirements, until January 1, 2001.
This bill would revise the definitions of the terms “handling fee,” and “PET container” and would define the terms “nonprofit convenience zone recycler,” “recycler” and “rural region recycler.”
This bill would reduce the minimum percentage of postfilled glass to 25% if the glass container manufacturer makes a specified demonstration to the department with regard to its use of mixed color cullet, as defined.
This bill would revise the procedure for determining the commingled rate paid for containers to repeal requirements regarding the holding of a public hearing and providing information before the effective date of a new rate, would repeal the existing procedure on January 1, 2001, and would establish a new procedure, effective January 1, 2001, for the calculation of a new commingled rate that includes the requirements for a prior public hearing and providing information.
The bill would increase the amount of the redemption payment paid by distributors to 2.5¢.
(2) Existing law defines “convenience zone” for the purposes of the act and requires that every convenience zone is to be served by at least one certified recycling center, with specified operating hours. The Director of Conservation is authorized to grant an exemption from these convenience zone requirements based on specified factors, including that the nearest certified recycling center is within a reasonable distance of the convenience zone being considered for the exemption.
This bill would revise the requirements regarding the operating hours for a recycling center in a rural region and would additionally include, as a factor to be considered in issuing an exemption from convenience zone requirements, that the convenience zone has redeemed less than 60,000 containers per month in the prior 12 months and a certified recycling center is located within one mile of the convenience zone that is the subject of the exemption.
(3) Existing law requires the department to pay to a processor for every empty beverage container received by the processor from a certified recycling center or other program, the sum of the refund value, 1 3/4% of the refund value for administrative costs, and a processing payment. Existing law requires the processor to pay a certified recycling center or other program the refund value, 1/2 of 1% of the refund value for administrative costs, and the processing payment. Existing law also requires a distributor of beverage containers to pay a redemption payment to the department, less1/2 of 1% for the distributor’s administrative costs. The redemption payment made to the department by a distributor of beer and other malt beverages is required to be made not later than the first day of the second month following the sale.
This bill would increase the amount of administrative costs paid to the processor to 2 1/2% of the refund value, and the administrative costs paid to the recycling center to 3/4 of 1% and would increase the administrative costs retained by the distributor to 1% of those administrative costs. The bill would increase the time when the redemption payment by beer and malt beverage distributors is required to be made to not later than the last day of the third month following the sale.
(4) Under the act, the department is required to calculate a processing fee for each beverage container with a specified scrap value, which is required to be paid by beverage manufacturers for each beverage container sold or transferred to a dealer. Until January 1, 2000, a processing fee is required to be imposed annually only if the scrap value for the material is less than the cost of recycling, and, after that date, a processing fee is required to be established pursuant to different criteria. Under the law in effect until January 1, 2000, the processing fee is reduced in an amount equal to 25% of the redemption payments projected to be paid by distributors of beverages sold in that container type for the previous calendar year.
This bill would revise the method of calculating the processing payment and would require the processing payment, to equal the difference between the scrap value offered to recyclers by willing purchasers and the cost of recycling containers and a reasonable financial return. The bill would require the department to use specified cost data for the January 1, 2000, processing payment calculation. The bill would require the actual processing fee to equal 65% of the processing payment, but the department would be required to adjust the amount of the processing fee, based upon the availability of funds in the processing fee account for that beverage material type so the amount of the processing fee equals 25% of the processing payment.
(5) Existing law requires the department to report specified data with respect to its responsibilities under the act within 70 days of each reporting period.
This bill would extend this period to 130 days.
(6) Existing law requires the department to transfer an amount equal to 25% of the redemption payments, and all processing fees, made for glass, PET, and bimetal beverage containers to, respectively, the Glass Processing Fee Account, the PET Processing Fee Account, and the Bimetal Processing Fee Account, for making processing payments for, and reducing processing fees paid for, these container types. After setting aside funds needed for the payment to refund values and administrative fees, and for these expenditures, the department is authorized to expend $18,500,000 of the moneys in the fund, until January 1, 2001, for the payment of handling fees, and $5,000,000, for payments for curbside programs, until January 1, 2001, to expend $7,000,000 annually for grants to community conservation corps, and to expend $2,000,000 for grants to nonprofit organizations or government programs.
This bill would increase these amounts to $23,500,000 for the payment of handling fees, $15,000,000 for payment for curbside programs, and $15,000,000 for grants to community conservation corps. The bill would authorize the expenditure of $10,500,000 annually for payments to cities and counties for beverage container recycling and litter cleanup activities, and $500,000 for grants for beverage recycling and litter reduction programs, and would require the payment of $6,840,000 to the City of San Diego, for a curbside recycling pilot program that would be terminated on January 1, 2004. The bill would extend the authorization to expend these funds for handling fees indefinitely and for curbside programs until an unspecified date, thereby making an appropriation. The bill would require the director to register the operators of curbside programs, and to adopt a procedure for registration of these programs. The bill would include neighborhood dropoff programs, as defined, as being eligible for those payments for curbside programs. The bill would authorize the department to pay each curbside recycling program a quality glass incentive payment for color-sorted glass collected by the curbside recycling program, in a total of not more than $3,000,000 per calendar year until an unspecified date.
The bill would delete the requirement that the department transfer 25% of the redemption values to those accounts. The bill would instead require the department to establish separate processing fee accounts in the fund for each beverage material type, and would require the department to transfer funds equal to 75% of the processing payments and all of the processing fees to those accounts. The bill would continuously appropriate the money in those accounts to the department to make processing payments and reduce processing fees, thereby making an appropriation.
The bill would require the department to expend $10,000,000 annually, between January 1, 2000, and January 1, 2002, to undertake a statewide public education and information campaign and to provide a report to the Legislature, by January 1, 2002, on the impact of the campaign.
The bill would require the department to annually expend $300,000 until January 1, 2003, pursuant to a cooperative agreement with Keep California Beautiful, to conduct a statewide public education campaign.
The bill would specify a procedure for the proportionate reduction of certain expenditures pursuant to the act and would require the department to convene a specified advisory group before making expenditures for the statewide public education and information campaign.
The bill would create the Penalty Account in the fund, would require all civil penalties and fines collected by the department to be deposited in that account, and would require the department to transfer the existing fines and civil penalties in the fund to that account. The revenues in the account would be available to the department, only upon appropriation by the Legislature, to carry out the act. The bill would make conforming changes.
(7) Existing law requires the department to adopt guidelines and methods for paying handling fees to supermarket sites, until January 1, 2001. Existing law requires the department to convene a hearing to ensure that handling fees paid to supermarket site recycling centers are not used for the purpose of engaging in unfair and predatory pricing. Existing law provides that, if the department determines there is clear and convincing evidence that a handling fee recipient has engaged in unfair and predatory pricing, the respondent is not eligible to receive handling fees for 3 months.
This bill would additionally make nonprofit convenience zone recyclers and rural region recyclers eligible to receive handling fees and would delete the repeal of the provisions governing the payment of handling fees, thereby extending those provisions indefinitely.
This bill would define the term “unfair and predatory pricing” for purposes of a new hearing procedure that this bill would establish, and would make a supermarket site that the department determines has engaged in unfair and predatory pricing, ineligible to receive handling fees after the date of that determination.
The bill would require the department to conduct an audit, by January 1, 2001, of the handling fees paid to supermarket sites.
(8) The existing California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989, which is administered by the California Integrated Waste Management Board, establishes an integrated waste management program, including providing for recycling to reduce solid waste disposal.
This bill would require the board, in consultation with the department, not later than December 1, 2000, to prepare and submit to the Legislature a report, as prescribed, that identifies any duplication or overlap between the California Integrated Waste Management Act of 1989 and the California Beverage Container Recycling and Litter Reduction Act with respect to programs pertaining to public information and education, local government review and assistance, and recycled materials market development.
(9) Under existing law, it is unlawful for any person to weigh, measure, or count any commodity unless the person is licensed as a weighmaster. Existing law exempts recycling centers established for the redemption of empty beverage containers from the laws relating to weighmasters.
This bill would additionally exempt, from those laws, certified recycling centers that purchase empty beverage containers from the public for recycling.
(10) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
Since a violation of the requirements imposed by the bill would be a crime, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating new crimes.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.