Bill Text

Bill Information


Add To My Favorites | print page

SB-314 Energy resources.(1993-1994)

SHARE THIS: share this bill in Facebook share this bill in Twitter
SB314:v95#DOCUMENT

Senate Bill No. 314
CHAPTER 1159

An act to add and repeal Section 18032.5 to the Health and Safety Code, to add Chapter 10.7 (commencing with Section 25920) to Division 15 of the Public Resources Code, to add Section 740.6 to the Public Utilities Code, and to add Section 257 to, and to add and repeal Section 5062 of, the Vehicle Code, relating to energy resources, and making an appropriation therefor.

[ Filed with Secretary of State  October 11, 1993. Approved by Governor  October 11, 1993. ]

LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 314, McCorquodale. Energy resources.
(1)  Existing law, known as the Mobilehomes-Manufactured Homes Act of 1980, generally regulates, among other things, standards for the construction and maintenance of mobilehomes and manufactured homes, as defined. Existing federal law, known as the Energy Policy Act of 1992, authorizes the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to adopt regulations establishing thermal insulation and energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing, as defined. Federal law also provides that, if the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development has not, on or before October 24, 1993, adopted final regulations that establish these standards and that take effect before January 1, 1995, then states may establish specified energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing.
This bill would make specified findings and declarations of the Legislature with respect to energy efficiency standards for residential buildings.
The bill would require the Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with the Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, to develop and implement cost-effective energy efficiency standards, as specified, for manufactured housing, to take effect before January 1, 1995. The department would be required to enforce those standards. This provision would become operative only if the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development has not, on or before October 24, 1993, issued regulations establishing standards for that housing, and would be repealed if the secretary issues those regulations.
(2)  Existing law requires the California Housing Finance Agency, cities, and counties, in specified instances, to give priority to processing construction loans or mortgage loans that incorporate innovative and energy efficient techniques to reduce costs. Existing federal law, the Energy Policy Act of 1992, requires the establishment of an energy efficient mortgage pilot program in 5 states.
This bill would require the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to develop and implement a pilot program to promote the use of energy efficient mortgages, as specified, and to report to the Governor and the Legislature regarding the pilot program.
(3)  Existing law prescribes the duties and responsibilities of the Public Utilities Commission.
This bill would permit the Public Utilities Commission to authorize investor-owned gas and electric utilities to match specified grants provided to nonprofit agencies and local governments, and would limit the amount of matching funds to a statewide total of $300,000. The expenditures for those purposes would be recoverable in rates.
Because a violation of the orders, decisions, rules, or other requirements of the Public Utilities Commission is a misdemeanor, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program by creating a new crime.
(4)  Existing law authorizes the Department of Motor Vehicles to issue special commemorative license plates to qualified applicants and personalized environmental license plates for additional fees, as specified.
This bill would authorize CALSTART, a nonprofit organization, to participate, with the approval of the department, in a special interest license plate program, to be known as the Rosenthal Blue Sky License Plate Program, and would require the department to issue special interest license plates containing the distinctive design or decal of CALSTART, to any person who applies for the plates through CALSTART, to be displayed in lieu of regular license plates. The bill would require CALSTART to collect and hold applications for the plates until it has received at least 5,000 applications, and then submit the applications along with the necessary fees to the department not later than November 1, 1996. The bill would require CALSTART to refund to all applicants any fees or deposits which have been collected if 5,000 applications have not been received by that date and to notify the department.
The bill would require the department to deduct its costs to develop and administer special interest license plate programs and would specify instances in which persons may retain a special interest license plate.
The bill would provide for the repeal of the program if the requisite number of applications are not received.
(5)  Under existing law, funds in the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account, as defined in federal law, consisting of federal oil overcharge funds, have been disbursed to this state by the federal government and deposited in the Federal Trust Fund.
This bill would, to the extent permitted by federal law, appropriate $17,775,000 of those funds from the Federal Trust Fund to specified entities for specified purposes relating to energy resources.
(6)  The bill would authorize the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, for the 1993–94 fiscal year only, to make prescribed grants from existing resources for specified projects. If sufficient resources are not available, up to a specified amount of the funds appropriated by (5) above would be appropriated for those grants.
(7)  Existing law establishes the Katz Safe Schoolbus Clean Fuel Efficiency Demonstration Program, and declares the Legislature’s intent to appropriate, for implementation of that program, 1/2 of each future disbursement of federal oil overcharge funds received by the state.
This bill would require that those funds that are available for appropriation in the 1993–94 fiscal year, be used, upon appropriation, in accordance with the Legislature’s declared intent. (8)  The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Appropriation: YES  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 Section 18032.5 is added to the Health and Safety Code, to read:

18032.5.
 (a)  The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:
(1)  California’s energy efficiency standards for new residential buildings have provided significant savings to homeowners and renters.
(2)  As a result of past federal preemption of the field and the exemption of manufactured homes from building standards under California law, California’s energy efficiency residential building standards have not been applied to manufactured housing.
(3)  The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-486) authorizes the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development to adopt regulations establishing thermal insulation and energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing. If the secretary has not issued, within one year after October 24, 1992, the date of the enactment of the act, final regulations that establish standards that take effect before January 1, 1995, states may establish specified energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing.
(4)  The 1992–93 California Energy Plan, endorsed by the Governor, recommends that the federal government adopt significantly more stringent, cost-effective energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing, or, in the alternative, allow states to adopt these standards.
(5)  It is in the interest of this state to participate in any federal rulemaking proceeding establishing energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing, and, in the absence of timely final federal regulations, it is in the interest of this state to adopt its own energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing as authorized under federal law.
(b)  The Department of Housing and Community Development, in consultation with the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, shall develop and implement cost-effective energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing, to take effect before January 1, 1995. These standards shall include, but are not limited to, lighting, insulation, climate control systems, and other design and construction features that increase efficiency in energy use for manufactured housing. The standards shall be cost-effective when taken in their entirety, and when amortized over the economic life of the structure. The department shall have responsibility for enforcing the standards. The standards shall be developed in consultation with members of the manufactured housing industry.
(c)  This section shall become operative only if the Secretary of the United States Department of Housing and Urban Development does not issue, on or before October 24, 1993, final regulations that establish thermal insulation and energy efficiency standards for manufactured housing that take effect before January 1, 1995. If the secretary does issue those final regulations, this section shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1995, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1995, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 2.

 Chapter 10.7 (commencing with Section 25920) is added to Division 15 of the Public Resources Code, to read:
CHAPTER  10.7. Energy Efficient Mortgages

25920.
 The Legislature hereby finds and declares all of the following:
(a)  The Energy Policy Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-486) directs the federal government to establish an energy efficient mortgage pilot program in five states to promote the purchase of existing energy efficient residential buildings and the installation of cost-effective improvements in existing residential buildings. The act also establishes a training program regarding the benefits of energy efficient mortgages and the operation of a pilot program, and authorizes the appropriation of federal funds to carry out those pilot programs and training programs.
(b)  The high cost of housing is a critical problem in California, as less than one-half of California households can afford to buy a median-priced home.
(c)  Reducing a home’s monthly energy costs through energy efficiency improvements can make the home more affordable by increasing the homeowner’s disposable income, which allows the homeowner to qualify for a higher mortgage and increases the number of Californians that can afford to buy a home.
(d)  More than 60 percent of California homes were built before energy standards were adopted for new homes in the mid-1970s. These older homes are disproportionate energy consumers. The average home built in 1968 consumes twice the energy of a home built after 1983.
(e)  A wide range of cost-effective energy efficiency improvements can be made to homes, resulting in lower energy use, lower utility energy bills, reduced societal demand for new energy sources, and reduced environmental degradation related to the generation of energy.
(f)  Energy efficient mortgages provide money to fund energy efficiency improvements in residential homes, resulting in lower energy costs to the homeowner. Energy efficient mortgages also increase the number of Californians, particularly of low- and moderate-income, who can qualify for home financing, because the incremental increase in monthly mortgage cost is more than offset by lower monthly energy bills.
(g)  Although energy efficient mortgages have been available for a number of years, they are rarely used because borrowers are unaware of their existence or of the benefits that they can provide, and most lenders and real estate licensees are unaware of, or unfamiliar with, the energy efficient mortgage.
(h)  The 1992–93 California Energy Plan, endorsed by the Governor, recommends that the state support the marketing of mortgages that account for energy efficiency.

25921.
 The Legislature further finds and declares all of the following:
(a)  It is in the interest of the people of this state that energy efficient mortgages be marketed and made available statewide, to increase awareness of their availability and their benefits.
(b)  It is also in the interest of the state to seek to participate in federal government programs in this area, including energy efficient mortgage pilot and related training programs, and to seek federal funding to promote the use of energy efficient mortgages.

25922.
 The commission shall develop and implement a pilot program to determine how best to inform homeowners and potential homeowners of the availability, methods, and benefits of obtaining an energy efficient mortgage.

25923.
 The pilot program shall be designed to do all of the following:
(a)  Meet the eligibility requirements of the energy efficient mortgage pilot program and training program established by the federal government pursuant to the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-486) if this state is chosen to participate in the federal government’s pilot program.
(b)  Familiarize mortgage lenders, real estate licensees, home appraisers, home inspectors, energy utilities, energy service providers, and other participants with the features of the energy efficient mortgage and the benefits that can result from its use.
(c)  Identify and implement effective methods of informing the public of the availability and benefits of the energy efficient mortgage.
(d)  Develop methods of incorporating the use of the energy efficient mortgage into the regular business practices of mortgage lenders, real estate licensees, home appraisers, home inspectors, and other persons involved in the sale, refinancing, and remodeling of residential real estate.
(e)  Encourage the use of a home energy rating analysis as a precondition to qualification for an energy efficient mortgage.
(f)  Identify obstacles to the use of energy efficient mortgages and recommend ways to mitigate or eliminate the obstacles.

25924.
 (a)  The commission shall convene one or more workshops with mortgage lenders, real estate licensees, home appraisers, home inspectors, energy utilities, energy service providers, and other appropriate parties to solicit recommendations on the implementation of the pilot program. The commission shall encourage those parties to participate in the pilot program.
(b)  The commission shall consult, as needed, with the State Banking Department, the Department of Savings and Loan, the Department of Real Estate, and the Department of Housing and Community Development in carrying out this chapter.

25925.
 The commission shall report to the Governor and the Legislature upon the completion of the pilot program. Copies of the report shall also be sent to the appropriate policy committees of the Legislature, including the housing committees of the Senate and the Assembly. The report shall include all of the following:
(a)  Results of the pilot program, including, but not limited to, the number of energy efficient mortgages used and the number of people who qualified for home financing as a result of using an energy efficient mortgage.
(b)  Obstacles to the use of energy efficient mortgages.
(c)  Recommendations on how to improve the use and effectiveness of energy efficient mortgages.

SEC. 3.

 Section 740.6 is added to the Public Utilities Code, to read:

740.6.
 (a)  The commission may authorize investor-owned gas and electric utilities to match grants provided to nonprofit agencies and local governments to participate in the Department of Economic Opportunity’s pilot program to identify and counsel low-income individuals and group facilities that are eligible to receive rate discounts and weatherization benefits offered by those utilities. The amount of utility matching funds for the pilot program shall be limited to a statewide total of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000). The commission shall require that utility expenditures for those purposes be recoverable in rates.
(b)  If federal funds become available for low-income energy assistance or weatherization programs that may be secured with matching funds from states or utilities, the commission may authorize investor-owned gas and electric utilities to match those federal funds, and shall require that utility expenditures for those purposes be recoverable in rates.

SEC. 4.

 Section 257 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

257.
 A “clean fuel vehicle” means any passenger or commercial vehicle or pickup truck that is fueled by alternative fuels, as defined in Section 301 of the Energy Policy Act of 1992 (P.L. 102-486), and produces emissions which do not exceed whichever of the following standards, as defined by regulations of the State Air Resources Board in effect on January 1, 1994, is applicable to the model year of the vehicle:
(a)  For a vehicle of the 1994 to 1996, inclusive, model year, the emission standard applicable to a transitional low-emission vehicle.
(b)  For a vehicle of the 1997 model year, the emission standard applicable to a low-emission vehicle.
(c)  For a vehicle of the 1998 to 2000, inclusive, model year, the emission standard applicable to an ultra low-emission vehicle.

SEC. 5.

 Section 5062 is added to the Vehicle Code, to read:

5062.
 (a)  This section shall be known, and may be cited, as the Rosenthal Blue Sky License Plate Program.
(b)  The Legislature hereby finds and declares that CALSTART is a California nonprofit consortium dedicated to the development and commercialization of advanced transportation technologies, including clean fuel vehicles, and that CALSTART should be authorized to undertake a special environmental “Blue Sky” license plate program to facilitate the purchase and use of clean fuel vehicles in the state.
(c)  CALSTART may, with the approval of the department, participate in this special interest license plate program.
(d)  CALSTART may, with the approval of the department, develop a distinctive design, in conformance with Section 5060, for inclusion on a special interest license plate. The license plate shall be known as the Blue Sky license plate and shall signify that the vehicle to which it is assigned is a clean fuel vehicle.
(e)  Any person who owns or leases a clean fuel vehicle, as defined in Section 257, and who applies for an original or renewal registration of that vehicle, may apply, through CALSTART, for a set of Blue Sky license plates in lieu of regular license plates.
(f)  The Blue Sky license plate is subject to Sections 5106 and 5108. The revenues derived from the sale of the license plates shall be deposited in the California Environmental License Plate Fund, after the department has deducted its costs for developing and administering the program.
(g)  Notwithstanding Section 5060, a Blue Sky license plate may, upon application of the holder, be transferred to another clean fuel vehicle. If the vehicle to which transfer is sought is not a clean fuel vehicle, the plates shall be surrendered to the department.
(h)  CALSTART, in coordination with the State Air Resources Board, the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission, and the Public Utilities Commission, shall undertake efforts to publicize the availability of Blue Sky license plates.
(i)  Notwithstanding Section 5060, CALSTART shall have 12 months, commencing November 1, 1995, to receive the required applications and to notify the department that the requisite number of applications have been received. If, after that 12-month period, 5,000 applications have not been received, CALSTART shall immediately notify the department and refund to all applicants any fees or deposits which have been collected.
(j)  If, on November 1, 1996, the department has not received a notice from CALSTART pursuant to subdivision (i) or if, on or before that date CALSTART notifies the department that the requisite number of applications have not been received, the department shall provide that information to the Secretary of State, and this section shall become inoperative upon receipt of that information by the Secretary of State, and shall remain in effect only until January 1, 1997, and as of that date is repealed, unless a later enacted statute, which is enacted before January 1, 1997, deletes or extends that date.

SEC. 6.

 Notwithstanding Sections 13340 and 16361 of the Government Code, and to the extent permitted by federal law, the sum of seventeen million seven hundred seventy-five thousand dollars ($17,775,000) of the money in the Federal Trust Fund, created by Section 16360 of the Government Code, received by the state from federal oil overcharge funds in the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account, as defined by Section 155 of the Further Continuing Appropriations Act of 1983 (P.L. 97-377) or other federal law, and consisting of federal oil overcharge funds available pursuant to court judgments or federal agency orders, is hereby appropriated, for expenditure in the 1993–94 fiscal year as follows:
(a)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the Department of Justice for a video arraignment system for the City of Santa Ana.
(b)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the Department of Parks and Recreation for development of an energy efficient transportation and energy efficient water delivery system for the Colonel Allensworth State Historic Park.
(c)  The sum of three million one hundred fifty-three thousand dollars ($3,153,000) to the Department of Transportation for grants as follows:
(1)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) to the City of Coronado for an automatic vehicle identification system on the San Diego-Coronado Bridge.
(2)  The sum of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to the City of Torrance for a telecommuting center.
(3)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the City of Vallejo for bike lane construction.
(4)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the County of Yolo for improvement of the Russell Boulevard Bike Path.
(5)  The sum of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) to the City of Lompoc for a bikeway and pedestrian project.
(6)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the City of Buenaventura for acquisition of the Right-of-Way for the Ventura River Bike Trail.
(7)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the City of Pacifica for construction of the frontage road bypass of Highway 1.
(8)  The sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to the City of Stockton for extension of the Calaveras Bikeway.
(9)  The sum of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to the City of Santa Clarita for an intersection improvement in Bouquet Canyon.
(10)  The sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to the City of Gustine for a bike route system.
(11)  The sum of twenty-three thousand dollars ($23,000) to the City of Santa Barbara for traffic signal retiming.
(12)  The sum of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) to the County of Stanislaus for a traffic signal project in the city of Turlock.
(13)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the City of San Diego for a fuel efficient traffic management system on Clairemont Mesa Boulevard.
(14)  The sum of one hundred twenty-five thousand dollars ($125,000) to the County of San Bernardino for signal synchronization.
(15)  The sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to the City of Realto for metrolink station development.
(16)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the County of Contra Costa for planning studies for rail and bus transit access, transit connections, and transfer points to the east county area.
(17)  The sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) to the City of Sacramento for a downtown intermodal passenger terminal.
(18)  The sum of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) to the City of Vallejo for synchronization of signals on the Georgia Street corridor.
(19)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the Simi Valley Transportation Management Association for a telecommuting demonstration project.
(d)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the Department of Economic Opportunity for an energy crisis intervention program.
(e)  The sum of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) to the California Department of Housing and Community Development for energy efficient mobile homes.
(f)  The sum of thirty thousand dollars ($30,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission for energy efficient mobile homes.
(g)  (1)  The sum of three hundred thousand dollars ($300,000) to the Department of Economic Opportunity for grants to nonprofit agencies and local governments that participate in the department’s Low-Income Home Energy Assistance Program, and Weatherization Assistance Program, to be used in a pilot program to identify and counsel low-income individuals and group facilities that are eligible to receive rate discounts and weatherization benefits offered by gas and electric utilities.
(2)  Grant recipients shall coordinate their activities with the Public Utilities Commission, and gas and electric utilities, to identify low-income ratepayers and group facilities that qualify under the commission’s Low-Income Ratepayer Assistance program and Low-Income Weatherization program.
(3)  Grant recipients shall also coordinate their activities with municipal energy utilities that offer special rates or benefits to low-income ratepayers.
(4)  The department, in consultation with the Public Utilities Commission, shall report to the Legislature upon completion of the pilot program on the results of the joint efforts by the department, the commission, and gas and electric utilities to increase the number of qualified low-income ratepayers participating in utility low-income energy assistance and weatherization programs.
(5)  The money appropriated by this act shall be disbursed by the Controller, subject to approval by the Director of Finance as to which court judgment or federal agency order is the proper source of those funds.
(h)  The sum of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to support the commission’s intervenor award program, administered by the commisson’s public advisor, to provide intervenors facing financial hardship with reasonable awards to pay for the costs of participating in commission proceedings.
(i)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to develop and implement a pilot program to promote the use of energy efficient mortgages pursuant to Chapter 10.7 (commencing with Section 25920) of Division 15 of the Public Resources Code.
(j)  The sum of three million eight hundred two thousand dollars ($3,802,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission for grants as follows:
(1)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to CALSTART for clean fuels license plates pursuant to Section 5062 of the Vehicle Code.
(2)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to the Berkeley Gateway Transportation Management Agency for an intracity shuttle.
(3)  The sum of fifty-five thousand dollars ($55,000) to the City of Chula Vista for a fuel retrofit program.
(4)  The sum of fifty thousand dollars ($50,000) to the City of Chula Vista for an aluminum air battery development project.
(5)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the City of Chula Vista for a CO2 Reduction Pilot Program.
(6)  The sum of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000) to the City of Lakewood for improvement of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems at city facilities.
(7)  The sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) to Lake County for construction of pipeline for the Geyser Effluent Injection Project.
(8)  The sum of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000) to the City of Long Beach for a city hall interior lighting retrofit project.
(9)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) to CALSTART for electric and hybrid electric bus development programs.
(10)  The sum of eighty-two thousand dollars ($82,000) to the City of Santa Barbara for an electric shuttle.
(11)  The sum of eighty thousand dollars ($80,000) to the City of Oakdale for alternative fuel or electric minivans.
(12)  The sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) to the County of Mariposa for improvement of the heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning system.
(13)  The sum of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000) to the City of Garden Grove for energy efficient lighting for city facilities.
(14)  The sum of ten thousand dollars ($10,000) to the Riverside Transit Agency for conversion of service vehicles to propane fuel.
(15)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the Riverside Transit Agency for alternative fuel or electric minibuses.
(16)  The sum of forty thousand dollars ($40,000) to the Riverside Transit Agency for computer equipment for transit service planning.
(17)  The sum of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000) to the City of Woodlake for energy efficient conversion of a public pool chlorination system.
(18)  The sum of two hundred sixty-five thousand dollars ($265,000) to the City of San Jose for energy efficient lighting.
(19)  The sum of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) to the City of Long Beach for SERRF plant performance improvements.
(20)  The sum of one hundred thousand dollars ($100,000) to the County of Merced for energy efficient ballpark lights.
(21)  The sum of four hundred thousand dollars ($400,000) to the U.C. Riverside, Center for Environmental Research and Technology, for energy technology demonstration projects.
(22)  The sum of two hundred thousand dollars ($200,000) to the Alameda Congestion Management Agency for promotion of commuter alternatives and expansion of existing congestion management program.
(k)  The sum of eight million sixty thousand dollars ($8,060,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to be allocated as follows:
(1)  The sum of one million five hundred thousand dollars ($1,500,000) for the transportation energy technology advancement program.
(2)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the targeted research and development demonstration program.
(3)  The sum of one million seven hundred fifty thousand dollars ($1,750,000) for the energy technology advancement program.
(4)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the energy partnership loan program.
(5)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the heavy duty truck demonstration program.
(6)  The sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) for the light- and medium-duty electric vehicle demonstration program.
(7)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the natural gas light duty vehicle demonstration program.
(8)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for the small school district loan program.
(9)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) for alternative transportation fuels for Yosemite National Park.
(10)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for conservation inventory measurement and resources plan integration.
(11)  The sum of two hundred fifty thousand dollars ($250,000) for building efficiency monitoring and measurement.
(12)  The sum of three hundred ten thousand dollars ($310,000) for transportation demand management measures.
( l)  The sum of one million dollars ($1,000,000) to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to provide funding for the San Diego ITER project.
(m)  The sum of five hundred thousand dollars ($500,000) to the Office of Planning and Research for the small business energy assistance program.

SEC. 7.

 Unless there are sufficient existing resources available to the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission to make the grants specified in this section, in which case the commission shall fund those grants from those existing resources, the amount appropriated in subdivision (k) of Section 6 of this act shall be reduced by an amount equal to the difference between three hundred twenty thousand dollars ($320,000) and the amount available from those existing resources, and that amount is hereby appropriated to the commission, for the 1993–94 fiscal year only, to make the following grants:
(1)  City Hall Interior Lighting Retrofit project for the City of Long Beach in the amount of one hundred fifty thousand dollars ($150,000).
(2)  Improvements of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems for the County of Mariposa in the amount of ten thousand dollars ($10,000).
(3)  Improvements of heating, ventilation, and air-conditioning systems at city facilities for the City of Lakewood in the amount of seventy-five thousand dollars ($75,000).
(4)  Energy efficient lighting for city facilities for the City of Garden Grove in the amount of sixty thousand dollars ($60,000).
(5)  Energy efficient conversion of public pool chlorination system for the City of Woodlake in the amount of twenty-five thousand dollars ($25,000).

SEC. 8.

 Money in the Federal Trust Fund, received by the state from federal oil overcharge funds in the Petroleum Violation Escrow Account, which is available for appropriation during the 1993–94 fiscal year, shall be used, upon appropriation, in accordance with subdivision (b) of Section 4 of Chapter 1426 of the Statutes of 1988, which declared the intent of the Legislature to appropriate one-half of each future disbursement received by the state from the account to complete the implementation of a one hundred million dollar ($100,000,000) Katz Safe Schoolbus Clean Fuel Efficiency Demonstration Program (Part 10.7 (commencing with Section 17910) of the Education Code).

SEC. 9.

 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII  B of the California Constitution because the only costs which may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, changes the definition of a crime or infraction, changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, or eliminates a crime or infraction. Notwithstanding Section 17580 of the Government Code, unless otherwise specified in this act, the provisions of this act shall become operative on the same date that the act takes effect pursuant to the California Constitution.