Existing law authorizes the management of a mobilehome park to require that a purchaser of a mobilehome which will remain in the park comply with any rule or regulation limiting residents to adults only.
This bill would instead authorize the management of a mobilehome park to require that a prospective purchaser comply with these rules and regulations if consistent with specified provisions of federal law and implementing regulations relating to housing for older persons.
The existing California Fair Employment and Housing Act (FEHA) makes it unlawful to discriminate against any person in any housing accommodation on the basis of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, national origin, or ancestry. It permits the Department of Fair Employment and Housing to engage in affirmative actions to prevent and provide for effective remedies against housing discrimination.
This bill would additionally make it unlawful to discriminate in any housing accommodation on the basis of familial status or disability, as defined, and would expand the definition of housing discrimination to include the refusal to reasonably accommodate a disabled person in a rental agreement or housing accommodation, as specified. It would prohibit any person, organization, or entity whose business involves real estate transactions from discriminating against any person in the terms or conditions of a transaction on the basis of familial status or disability. It would make it unlawful to deny a person access to, or membership or participation in, a multiple listing service real estate broker organization, or other service because of race, color, religion, sex, marital status, ancestry, disability, familial status, or national origin.
Existing law permits the department to provide assistance to communities and persons therein in resolving disputes, disagreements, or difficulties relating to discriminatory practices based on race, religious creed, color, national origin, ancestry, physical handicap, medical condition, marital status, sex, or age, that impair the rights of these persons and communities under federal or state law.
This bill would additionally permit the department to provide assistance to communities and persons therein in resolving disputes, disagreements, or difficulties relating to discriminatory practices based on familial status and disability, and would, for purposes of these provisions, substitute the term “disability” for “physical handicap.”
This bill would provide that the FEHA shall not prohibit religious and related societies and organizations from engaging in enumerated activities related to the provision of housing and lodging, as specified.
This bill would further provide that nothing in the FEHA shall be construed to interfere with the rights and remedies afforded to any class of persons under specified provisions of federal law and implementing regulations, that FEHA may be construed to afford greater rights and remedies to aggrieved persons than those afforded by federal law, and that FEHA shall not be construed to abrogate or limit the holding in a specified court decision.
This bill would extend the time for filing a verified complaint alleging housing discrimination under the FEHA from 60 days to one year from the date the alleged violation occurred or terminated, and would require the department to commence proceedings within 30 days of filing of the complaint. It would require the department to complete its investigation of the complaint within 100 days, unless it is impracticable to do so, at which time, the department would be required to notify the complainant and respondent of its reasons for not completing a timely investigation. It would provide that all agreements reached in settlement of any housing discrimination complaint filed pursuant to a specified statute be made public, unless the complainant and respondent otherwise agree, and the department determines that disclosure is not required to further the purposes of the FEHA. It would require the department, upon the conclusion of each investigation, to prepare a final investigative report containing specified information.
Existing law authorizes the director in the name of the department to issue, as specified, a written accusation in cases of failure to eliminate an alleged violation of the FEHA in certain circumstances, except that any accusation alleging an unfair housing practice shall be issued within 150 days after the filing of a complaint.
This bill would instead require the director to cause to be issued a written accusation in the name of the department alleging an unfair housing practice within 100 days after the filing of a complaint, and make final administrative disposition of a complaint within one year, unless it is impracticable to do so, at which time, the department would be required to notify the complainant and respondent of its reasons for not making a timely administrative disposition. It would permit the respondent to answer the charges contained in the complaint at an administrative hearing or civil trial, as elected by the parties to the complaint. It would authorize any aggrieved person to intervene as a party in the proceeding. It would further require the department, if it determines that an allegation concerns the legality of any zoning or other land use law or ordinance, to refer the case to the Attorney General for appropriate action, in lieu of issuing an accusation.
Existing law requires the department to cause to be served upon or mailed to a housing owner a copy of the verified complaint within 45 days.
This bill would instead require the department to cause to be served that verified complaint within 10 days and would require the department to advise in writing a respondent of his or her procedural rights and obligations. It would also permit that respondent to file an answer to the complaint.
Existing law provides that if the department does not issue a written accusation alleging a housing violation within 150 days after the filing of a complaint, the aggrieved person may elect to bring a civil action in an appropriate court.
This bill would provide that, if an accusation is issued, a complainant, a respondent, or an aggrieved person on whose behalf a complaint is filed may elect, within a specified period of time and in lieu of an administrative proceeding, to have the claims asserted in the charge adjudicated in a civil action. It would further provide that if either party serves a notice of election upon the department, as prescribed, the department shall, within 30 days after service of the election, dismiss the accusation. It would require the department itself, or at its election through the Attorney General, within 30 days of receipt of the notice of election, to file a civil action with the proper municipal or superior court of competent jurisdiction, as specified, in its name or on behalf of the aggrieved person as a real party in interest. It would authorize any person aggrieved with respect to the issues to be determined in a civil action filed under this part to intervene as a matter of right in that civil action.
This bill would further permit an aggrieved person to commence a civil action in an appropriate court not later than 2 years after the occurrence or termination of an alleged discriminatory housing practice, or the breach of a conciliation agreement, whichever occurs last, and would establish procedures for the computation of the 2-year period, as specified.
This bill would, with respect to civil action pursuant to the foregoing authorizations, authorize a court, where that court finds that a discriminatory housing practice has occurred or is about to occur, to award the plaintiff or complainant actual and punitive damages, other relief, as provided, to prevent unlawful practices, and attorney’s fees and costs. It would provide that none of the above relief shall affect a consummated contract, sale, encumbrance, or lease, as provided, without notice of the filing of a complaint or civil action.
Existing law permits the department, after a hearing on a housing discrimination complaint in which the department finds that the respondent has engaged in a practice prohibited by the FEHA, to serve an order on the respondent requiring that one or more specified actions be taken, including affirmative or prospective relief.
This bill would additionally require the department, where it has reasonable cause to believe that a respondent has breached a conciliation agreement, to refer the matter to the Attorney General with a recommendation that a civil action be filed for the enforcement of the agreement.
This bill would, in addition, permit the commission to require the payment to the complainant of a civil penalty against any named respondent, not to exceed $10,000, unless, in a separate accusation, the respondent has been judged to have, with intent, committed a prior violation of the FEHA’s housing discrimination provisions, in which case the amount that may be assessed is dependent upon the amount of time that has elapsed between the current violation and the prior violation that the respondent was found to have committed. It would also permit the commission to award actual damages, and injunctive or other equitable remedies as part of affirmative or prospective relief, and to award the prevailing party, other than the government, reasonable attorney’s fees and costs.
This bill would require the Attorney General to commence a civil action with respect to discriminatory housing practices, and patterns or practices of denying rights with respect to fair housing. It would require the Attorney General to enforce a subpoena issued pursuant to housing discrimination provisions. It would authorize a court, in a civil action commenced pursuant to the above authorization, to award preventive relief, other appropriate relief, as specified, a civil penalty, as specified, and reasonable attorney’s fees and costs, as specified. It would also authorize an aggrieved person or party to a conciliation agreement to intervene in a civil action commenced pursuant to the above authorization.