(a)The bureau shall not approve, verify the exemption from this chapter of, or contract for the complaint handling of an institution not previously either approved to operate by the bureau or verified by the Attorney General either as a nonprofit corporation or as a public institution of higher education until both of the following requirements occur:
(1)The bureau provides the public with notice of the application or request for approval, exemption, or complaint handling. The notice shall be posted on the bureau’s internet website and included as an item listed on the agenda prepared for an advisory meeting of the bureau.
(2)The Attorney General determines that the institution meets the definition of a nonprofit corporation or of a public institution of higher education. However, an institution shall not meet the definition of a nonprofit corporation if any of the following applies:
(A)
The Attorney General determines the institution has engaged in an activity in which the net earnings of the institution benefit any person. The Attorney General shall presume the institution has engaged in such an activity if it has engaged in a reportable incident, unless the Attorney General determines otherwise. A reportable
incident is the reporting of any item under the following categories on United States Internal Revenue Service Form 990, Return of Organization Exempt from Income Tax, or a successor form:
(i)
An excess benefit transaction.
(ii)
A transaction with a disqualified individual.
(iii)
A
prohibited shelter transaction.
(iv)
An equity-based compensation arrangement.
(v)
Compensation based on revenues.
(B)
94874.1.
(a) The bureau shall not verify the exemption from this chapter of, or contract for the complaint handling for, a nonprofit institution that operated as a for-profit institution during any period on or after January 1, 2010,
unless the Attorney General determines all of the following:
(1) The institution acquired the institution’s assets for no more than the value of the assets.
(2) The institution has not executed agreements for goods or services exceeding the value of the goods or services.
(3) All core functions of the institution are conducted by, under the control of, or subject to significant direction by the institution, rather than a person or entity that a public institution of higher education or a nonprofit
corporation.
(4) The institution has not committed a substantial share of the institution’s assets to a joint venture with a person or entity, unless the joint venture is with an entity that is a public institution of higher education or nonprofit corporation, and all core functions of the venture are conducted by, under the control of, or subject to significant direction from that entity.
(b) The institution has either acquired assets from another entity or has previously operated as a for-profit institution, and the Attorney General
determines that the assets, or a significant portion of the assets, were acquired for more than the value of the assets. Value, “Value,” which shall include includes the value of any ongoing relationship, including any contract, agreement, lease, or other arrangement between the acquiring institution and the acquired institution or asset, as described in Section 180.905 of Title 2 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as it read on January 1, 2020, or between the procuring institution and the procured goods or services, shall be demonstrated through one of the following:
(i)
(1) A third-party valuation. appraisal based on comparable assets acquired by, or goods or services procured by, nonprofit corporations.
(ii)
(2) Independent financing of the acquisition or procurement based upon
the asset acquired. acquired or goods or services procured.
(iii)
(3) Full and open competition in the procurement of services or assets,
competition, as defined in Section 2.101(b) of Title 48 of the Code of Federal Regulations, as it read on January 1, 2020. 2020, in the acquisition of the assets or procurement of the goods or services.
(C)One or more of the core functions of the institution are conducted by, under the control of, or subject to significant direction from, a person or entity that is not a public institution of higher education and is not a nonprofit corporation. For these purposes, there shall be a conclusive presumption that a person or entity exercises significant direction if one or more of its employees or owners serves as an officer, member of the board, or person holding similar authority for the institution.
(D)A substantial share of the assets of the institution are committed to a joint venture with a person or entity that is not a public institution of higher education and is not a nonprofit corporation, and the core functions of the venture are
conducted by, under the control of, or subject to significant direction from that person or entity.
(b)For the purposes of determining tax exempt status for this chapter, the bureau and the Attorney General may consider the tax exempt status of an institution of higher education as determined pursuant to Section 501(c)(3) of the Internal Revenue Code. However, that status shall not be the sole factor for determining whether an entity is a nonprofit corporation.