SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) The Los Angeles River has a complex ecological and political history. The river originally ran freely along an alluvial flood plain, which today is the City of Los Angeles. In the 1930s, destructive flooding led the United States Army Corps of Engineers to design and build facilities to minimize the impacts of future floods, a process that included lining most of the river with concrete. Since then, the
city, county, and federal government have all played a role in restoring the Los Angeles River, including the county’s 1996 adoption of a master plan for developing and restoring the entire Los Angeles River. The City of Los Angeles developed a “revitalization plan” to restore the Upper Los Angeles River, which lies within the city’s boundaries. Most recently, the Corps of Engineers approved “Alternative 20,” a substantial restoration and infrastructure project along the Upper Los Angeles River.
(b) The City of Los Angeles was given responsibility for managing the river’s resources through a charter by the King of Spain at the end of the 18th century. After serious floods in the
1930s, the federal government, through the United States Army Corps of Engineers, stepped in to take responsibility for building and managing infrastructure projects to reduce the risk and damage from flooding, with the county as the local partner. The county also works with the city in managing the Upper Los Angeles River, where court decisions have held that the King of Spain’s charter gives the city “pueblo” water rights with authority to manage the Upper Los Angeles River’s resources. The courts have not given the city authority over the Lower Los Angeles River.
(c) The State of California retains its sovereign authority to manage the rivers within its boundaries, including the Los Angeles River. Historically, however, it has not exercised that authority, due to the dominance of the
United States Army Corps of Engineers in partnership with the county. The county’s master plan addresses the entire river but is close to two decades old, and would benefit from renewed attention to resources and development, especially on the lower river. The Lower Los Angeles River passes through many cities, but not one of these cities has the responsibility and the resources to invest in restoration of that part of the Los Angeles River. There is therefore opportunity and need for the state to aid in the development and implementation of the county’s Master Plan, especially for the Lower Los Angeles River.
(d) In 2014, California
voters approved the Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014, which included $60 million for the Los Angeles River, authorizing funding for both the Santa Monica Mountains Conservancy, which has responsibility for the Upper Los Angeles River, and the San Gabriel and Lower Los Angeles Rivers and Mountains Conservancy, which has responsibility for the Lower Los Angeles River. The Water Quality, Supply, and Infrastructure Improvement Act of 2014 allocated $30 million to each conservancy for the purpose of multibenefit water quality, water supply, and watershed protection and restoration projects for the watersheds.