Status


Bill PDF |Add To My Favorites | print page

AB-2616 Workers’ compensation: hospital employers: compensation.(2013-2014)

Senate
Assembly
Int
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto
Senate
Assembly
Int
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
1st
Cmt
2nd
3rd
Pass
Pass
Veto

Bill Status
AB-2616
Skinner (A)
-
-
Workers’ compensation: hospital employers: compensation.
03/25/14
An act to amend Section 4663 of, and to add Section 3212.13 to, the Labor Code, relating to workers’ compensation.
Assembly
08/26/14
08/18/14

Type of Measure
Inactive Bill - Vetoed
Majority Vote Required
Non-Appropriation
Fiscal Committee
Non-State-Mandated Local Program
Non-Urgency
Non-Tax levy
Last 5 History Actions
Date Action
09/29/14 Vetoed by Governor.
09/05/14 Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 3:30 p.m.
08/22/14 Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 24. Page 6325.).
08/20/14 In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 22 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77.
08/20/14 Read third time. Passed. Ordered to the Assembly. (Ayes 24. Noes 9. Page 4653.).
Governor's Message
To the Members of the California State Assembly:

I am returning Assembly Bill 2616 without my signature.

This bill would create a first of its kind private employer workers' compensation presumption for a specific staph infection -- methicillin-resistant Staphylococcus aureus (MRSA) -- for certain hospital employees.

California's no-fault system of worker's compensation insurance requires that claims must be "liberally construed" to extend benefits to injured workers whenever possible. The determination that an illness is work-related should be decided by the rules of that system and on the specific facts of each employee's situation. While I am aware that statutory presumptions have steadily expanded for certain public employees, I am not inclined to further this trend or to introduce it into the private sector.

Some have reported that hospitals have intimidated nurses from filing valid worker's compensation claims for a work-related MRSA infection. Any such conduct would be reprehensible. I am therefore directing the Department of Industrial Relations to investigate and take whatever action is needed.

Sincerely,



Edmund G. Brown Jr.