SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) There is a fundamental right to a verbatim record of any court proceeding because without an accurate record, litigants may not understand what the judge has ordered.
(b) The lack of a verbatim record of court proceedings may result in attorneys declining to take cases on appeal or may result in law enforcement being unable to enforce, among others, active restraining orders or child custody and visitation orders.
(c) Many Californians, regardless of income, are
navigating critical civil legal issues without legal representation or meaningful legal assistance. Nearly 90 percent of people facing eviction are unrepresented, and one or both parties are unrepresented in 70 percent of family law cases. The problem is worse for low-income Californians, particularly communities of color, tribal communities, rural Californians, those with disabilities, those who are limited English proficient, seniors, and people who have experienced domestic violence or sexual assault.
(d) Under existing law, the verbatim record may only be captured and transcribed by a certified shorthand reporter (CSR) in California courts, however, since 2013, an exception has been made to allow electronic recording in eviction cases, small claims court, traffic court, and misdemeanor criminal cases.
(e) A CSR is required to be provided in felony criminal cases and juvenile justice and dependency cases. In all other types of cases, the court is not required to provide a CSR, except upon the request of an indigent litigant. Parties may arrange for the services of a court reporter in all other cases, at an average cost of $3,300 per day.
(f) California courts currently employ about 1,200 full-time court reporters. To provide CSRs in mandated cases, courts estimate they will need to hire approximately 650 new court reporters. Over 50 percent of California courts have reported that they do not have CSRs to routinely cover nonmandated cases, including civil, family law, and probate cases, and over 30 percent can never provide CSRs in those cases. Currently, 74.5 percent of courts
are actively recruiting official court reporters to fill vacancies throughout California, with 102 court reporter vacancies for the Los Angeles County Superior Court alone.
(g) Although indigent litigants are entitled to a CSR free of charge, courts are increasingly unable to fulfill those requests. Instead, indigent litigants, including those seeking domestic violence restraining orders, emergency custody orders, and elder abuse and civil harassment protection orders, are forced to choose whether to proceed with their matter without a verbatim record or to return to court at a later date when a CSR may be available.
(h) In 2022, the Legislature appropriated $32,000,000 for courts to recruit, hire, and retain CSRs. These funds are meant for courts to offer salary raises, bonuses, and
educational benefits to incentivize becoming a court reporter. According to the preliminary fiscal year 2022–23 Schedule 7A, court-employed reporters’ median total salary and benefits is are an estimated $184,184. This is significantly lower than the cost to hire a court reporter through a private company at $2,580 per day for a deposition and $3,300 per day for a trial, on average. Additionally, transcripts must be purchased from court reporters. In 2021, the Legislature increased the statutory transcript fees by approximately 30 percent. In the 2021–22 fiscal year, California courts spent $18,400,000 on transcripts.
(i) Courts must compete with the private market for
CSR services and these services are required, on a daily basis, for thousands of non-court proceedings, including depositions, administrative hearings, arbitration hearings, and cases being heard by private judges.
(j) In 2022, there were 5,605 active CSRs of whom 4,829 listed an address in California. The number of licensed CSRs has been steadily dropping from 8,004 in 2000, to 7,503 in 2010, to 6,085 in 2020, representing a 30-percent decline since 2000.
(k) According to the National Court Reporters Association, the average court reporter is 55 years of age. In California, 44 percent of all licenses were issued 30 years ago or more.
(l) Applications to take the CSR licensing exam have declined, and the
passage rate is low. In 2018, 369 individuals took the licensing exam, and in 2021, only 175 individuals took the exam. Of those, only 40 individuals passed. In 2015, 96 licenses were issued, and in 2021, only 39 licenses were issued. Currently, only 8 court reporter training programs remain in California, down from 16 programs in 2011.
(m) In January and February of 2023 alone, the Los Angeles County Superior Court was unable to provide a CSR in 52,000 nonmandated civil, family, and probate cases. According to calculations by the court, this will result in over 300,000 cases going without a record this year.
(n) Where electronic recording is permitted, California has implemented stringent technical standards to ensure the recordings are of high quality and can be transcribed for
use to craft orders, provide meaningful access to an appeal, and for use in future proceedings to enforce or modify a court’s prior orders.
(o) Electronic recordings are subject to the same privacy, protection protection, and storage requirements as all other digital records held by California courts, and all California courts are required to maintain digital court files.
(p) The Court Reporters Board of California should allocate funding toward recruitment and retention by publicizing the profession to high schools, vocational schools, and higher education institutions.
(q) Courts are encouraged to provide senior CSRs as mentors to provisionally licensed CSRs until the expiration of the provisional license and ensure that courts continue to recruit, hire, and retain CSRs to the fullest extent possible.