15950.5.
The Legislature makes the following findings regarding the State of California’s commitment to provide equitable transportation services, including an effective and coherent network of transportation services for older Californians and people with disabilities and the right of that population to receive those services pursuant to this part:(a) Since the enactment of the Social Service Transportation Improvement Act, the number of Californians requiring services under this part has substantially increased without a corresponding increase in services or funding to meet expanding needs.
(b) Despite planning efforts by the state in 2003, 2004, 2005, 2007, and 2021 to improve these transportation services
for this population, there has been no notable progress. The state is stuck in a cycle of study and stagnate. While whole other segments of the transportation system benefit from progress, this underserved population languishes with substandard transportation options.
(c) The aging tsunami brought about by changing demographics has long been forecasted to increase the demand for expanded transportation services for seniors and persons with disabilities. This is a well-documented issue. The Master Plan for Aging indicates that by 2030, senior age groups will increase from 70 percent up to 274 percent. These age groups have cognitive and physical characteristics that either require public transportation services or result in the loss of ability to drive themselves, or both.
(d) Despite the increased demand for services and evolution in the methods for providing those services,
services for seniors and persons with disabilities have remained stagnant while other sectors of the transportation system have thrived under improved policies and increased funding. It is clear that the funding mechanism, value statements, and principles contained in this part must be updated.
(e) It is the intent of the Legislature that the Department of Transportation and the California Health and Human Services Agency actively monitor the planning for and provision of social service transportation, as defined by the coordinated public transit human services transportation plan, as described in Section 5310 of Title 49 of the United States Code, to ensure the orderly and systematic completion of improvements.
(f) The Legislature is aware that the public transit industry is consumed with other obligations as a result of climate change legislation, socioeconomic pressures,
paradigm shifts in technology, regulatory obligations, and Federal Americans with Disabilities Act of 1990 paratransit requirements, and thus does not have the organizational, operational, or financial capacity to serve this vulnerable population adequately.
(g) The Legislature is aware of a well-documented cyclical legacy of the state studying this issue, identifying solutions, and failing to implement those solutions. The amendments to the Social Service Transportation Improvement Act in the act that added this section are intended to address that legacy by improving accessible transportation as quickly as possible and by ensuring that, in the future, seniors and persons with disabilities will no longer be segregated from the benefits of any state transportation funding program.
(h) It is the Legislature’s belief that the stagnation found in this service area is multifactorial
and is a result of lack of funding, political friction as defined in Report 91 of the Transit Cooperative Research Program, organic and haphazard rather than systemic development and funding of accessible transportation systems, and decisionmaking and authority assigned to inappropriate agencies and levels of government, among other reasons.
(i) While the state has made substantial commitments to transportation funding for different modes, these investments have largely excluded services for older persons and those with disabilities, which is incompatible with the growing demand for these services due to demographic and other pressures.
(j) The Governor’s 2021 Master Plan for Aging described the growing population of older Californians as a “seismic shift,” with one out of every four qualifying as “older,” and despite this, the Master Plan included no substantive transportation
improvements for the target population.
(k) Victims of wildfires are often disproportionately seniors and persons with disabilities. These tragic outcomes can be related to limited access to quality transportation. Any planning effort intended to improve emergency response for this population requires a significantly improved baseline for accessible transportation services and for an accessible transportation system.