SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) The efficiency of heating, ventilation, and air conditioning equipment (HVAC) is highly dependent on the quality of its installation. A report by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission found that 85 percent of replacement HVAC systems are installed incorrectly, resulting in a 20 to 30 percent increase in energy use.
(b) California’s Building Energy Efficiency Standards codified in Part 6 (commencing with Section 100) of Title 24 of the California Code of Regulations (California Energy Code)
establish requirements for installation and acceptance test documentation to verify that HVAC and other building construction that impact building energy efficiency are installed and are performing correctly.
(c) Compliance rates for the requirements on installation and acceptance test documentation in the California Energy Code are low. Local building departments or officials are often unable to effectively enforce or verify compliance with those requirements due to the complexity of the California Energy Code and a lack of adequate resources.
(d) A single, accessible electronic state compliance document data registry would significantly improve enforcement and compliance by providing a building official the ability to go to one registry to confirm that all
compliance documentation requirements have been met.
(e) A central data registry is also a critical first step in creating an equipment tracking system to address the pervasive problem of underground construction work performed without permits and without complying with acceptance test requirements in the California Energy Code.
(f) If California is going to meet its energy efficiency and greenhouse gas reduction goals, it needs to take concrete steps to improve permit compliance.
(g) Reports by the State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission and by the Public Utilities Commission have found that permits are obtained for HVAC replacements as little as 10 percent of the time, and that
contractors comply with the California Energy Code’s quality installation requirements as little as 15 percent of the time. It is estimated that by correcting these problems, peak energy demand could be decreased by 400 megawatts.
(h) The 2015 Existing Building Energy Efficiency Action Plan Update states that “[a]ddressing the application, compliance and enforcement of building standards in existing buildings is a high priority” and calls for improving retrofit compliance with permitting and code requirements to 90 percent by 2020.
(i) To meet this compliance goal, the 2016 Existing Building Energy Efficiency Action Plan recommends development of an HVAC equipment sale registry that can be used to track HVAC sales to ensure that permit requirements are being followed for all HVAC
installations.
(j) An HVAC equipment sale registry would address numerous California Energy Code compliance issues, including permit noncompliance, noncompliance with the California Energy Code compliance documentation requirements, noncompliance with the Home Energy Rating System testing and acceptance testing requirements, unlicensed contractors, enforcement limitations on the Contractors State License Board and local building departments, and unfair competition from
contractors who do not follow the law.
(k) The lack of compliance and enforcement hurts contractors that comply with the California Energy Code who must bid against contractors that can cut costs by ignoring these requirements altogether.
(l) The State Energy Resources Conservation and Development Commission has adopted compliance data registry requirements in the 2008 California Energy Code and, in 2013, the commission added authorization for a compliance document repository. It has reiterated these requirements in every code update since. However, no compliance document repository or central data registry has been developed or implemented.
(m) Recent proposals for a State Energy Resources Conservation and
Development Commission’s compliance document repository would not be accessible by local building officials, would require the use of duplicative and potentially expensive private data registries, and would not provide an easily accessible, single source for determining if a construction project has complied with the compliance documentation requirements set forth in the California Energy Code. It would also not be compatible with efforts to increase permit compliance through tracking HVAC equipment serial numbers from sale to the completion of the compliance documentation required by the California Energy Code.