Bill Text

Bill Information

PDF |Add To My Favorites |Track Bill | print page

SB-822 Communications: broadband Internet access service.(2017-2018)

SHARE THIS:share this bill in Facebookshare this bill in Twitter
Date Published: 06/25/2018 09:00 PM
SB822:v94#DOCUMENT

Amended  IN  Assembly  June 25, 2018
Amended  IN  Assembly  June 11, 2018
Amended  IN  Senate  May 01, 2018
Amended  IN  Senate  April 19, 2018
Amended  IN  Senate  March 13, 2018

CALIFORNIA LEGISLATURE— 2017–2018 REGULAR SESSION

Senate Bill No. 822


Introduced by Senator Wiener
(Principal coauthors: Senators Allen, Dodd, Hill, McGuire, Monning, and Skinner)
(Principal coauthors: Assembly Members Bloom, Bonta, Chiu, Friedman, Kalra, and Mullin)
(Coauthor: Senator Leyva)
(Coauthor: Assembly Member Ting)

January 03, 2018


An act to add Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 1775) to Title 1.5 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, and to add Article 2 (commencing with Section 3020) to Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, relating to communications.


LEGISLATIVE COUNSEL'S DIGEST


SB 822, as amended, Wiener. Communications: broadband Internet access service.

Existing

(1) Existing law, the Consumers Legal Remedies Act, makes unlawful certain unfair methods of competition and unfair or deceptive acts or practices undertaken by any person in a transaction intended to result or which results in the sale or lease of goods or services to any consumer. Existing law authorizes any consumer who suffers damages as a result of the use or employment by any person of a method, act, or practice declared to be unlawful, as described above, to bring an action against that person to recover or obtain damages, restitution, an order enjoining the methods, acts, or practice, or any other relief the court deems proper.
This bill would revise the act to prohibit specified actions by an Internet service provider, as defined, that provides broadband Internet access service, as specified. The bill would prohibit an Internet service provider from offering different levels of quality of service to end users as part of broadband Internet access service unless specified conditions are met. The bill would make the consumer remedies and procedures of the act applicable to enforce those prohibitions. This bill would prohibit a public entity, as defined, from purchasing, or providing funding for the purchase of, any fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services that violate these prohibitions. The bill would require an Internet service provider that provides fixed or mobile broadband Internet access service purchased or funded by a public entity to publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access service that is sufficient to enable end users of those purchased or funded services, including a public entity, to fully and accurately ascertain if the service violates these prohibitions. defined, and make a violation of those prohibitions subject to the remedies available pursuant to the act.
(2) Existing law generally governs the state procurement of materials, supplies, equipment, and services, and the acquisition of electronic data-processing and telecommunications goods and services.
This bill would prohibit a state agency from contracting with an Internet service provider for the provision of broadband Internet access service unless that provider certifies under penalty of perjury that it is in full compliance with the requirements that this bill adds to the Consumers Legal Remedies Act. Because the bill would expand the crime of perjury, the bill would impose a state-mandated local program.
(3) This bill would include legislative findings and declarations and be known as the California Internet Consumer Protection and Net Neutrality Act of 2018.
(4) The California Constitution requires the state to reimburse local agencies and school districts for certain costs mandated by the state. Statutory provisions establish procedures for making that reimbursement.
This bill would provide that no reimbursement is required by this act for a specified reason.
Vote: MAJORITY   Appropriation: NO   Fiscal Committee: YES   Local Program: NOYES  

The people of the State of California do enact as follows:


SECTION 1.

 (a) The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:

(a)

(1) This bill is adopted pursuant to the police power inherent in the State of California to protect and promote the safety, life, public health, public convenience, general prosperity, and well-being of society, and the welfare of the state’s population and economy, that are increasingly dependent on an open and neutral Internet.

(b)

(2) Almost every sector of California’s economy, democracy, and society is dependent on the open and neutral Internet that supports vital functions regulated under the police power of the state, including, but not limited to, each of the following:

(1)

(A) Police and emergency services.

(2)

(B) Health and safety services and infrastructure.

(3)

(C) Utility services and infrastructure.

(4)

(D) Transportation infrastructure and services, and the expansion of zero- and low-emission transportation options.

(5)

(E) Government services, voting, and democratic decisionmaking processes.

(6)

(F) Education.

(7)

(G) Business and economic activity.

(8)

(H) Environmental monitoring and protection, and achievement of state environmental goals.

(9)

(I) Land use regulation.
(3) The Federal Communications Commission has repealed net neutrality rules intended to protect consumers and to ensure fair and reasonable access to the Internet.
(b) It is the intent of this act to ensure that corporations do not impede competition or engage in deceptive consumer practices, and that they offer service to residential broadband Internet customers on a nondiscriminatory basis.
(c) It is the intent of this act to protect and promote the Internet as an open platform enabling consumers choice, freedom of expression, end-user control, competition, and the freedom to innovate without permission, and thereby to encourage the deployment of advanced telecommunications capability and remove barriers to infrastructure investment.
(d) This act shall be known, and may be cited, as the California Internet Consumer Protection and Net Neutrality Act of 2018.

SEC. 2.

 Chapter 3.5 (commencing with Section 1775) is added to Title 1.5 of Part 4 of Division 3 of the Civil Code, to read:
CHAPTER  3.5. Internet Neutrality

1775.
 For purposes of this chapter, the following definitions apply:

(a)“Application-agnostic” means not differentiating on the basis of source, destination, Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device.

(b)“Application-specific differential pricing” means charging different prices for Internet traffic to customers on the basis of Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device, but does not include zero-rating.

(c)

(a) “Broadband Internet access service” means a mass-market retail service by wire or radio provided to customers in California that provides the capability to transmit data to, and receive data from, all or substantially all Internet endpoints, including any capabilities that are incidental to and enable the operation of the communications service, but excluding dial-up Internet access service. “Broadband Internet access service” also encompasses any service provided to customers in California that provides a functional equivalent of that service or that is used to evade the protections set forth in this chapter.

(d)“Class of Internet content, application, service, or device” means Internet content, or a group of Internet applications, services, or devices, sharing a common characteristic, including, but not limited to, sharing the same source or destination, belonging to the same type of content, application, service, or device, using the same application- or transport-layer protocol, or having similar technical characteristics, including, but not limited to, the size, sequencing, or timing of packets, or sensitivity to delay.

(e)“Content, applications, or services” means all Internet traffic transmitted to or from end users of a broadband Internet access service, including traffic that may not fit clearly into any of these categories.

(f)

(b) “Edge provider” means any individual or entity that provides any content, application, or service over the Internet, and any individual or entity that provides a device used for accessing any content, application, or service over the Internet.

(g)

(c) “End user” means any individual or entity that uses a broadband Internet access service.

(h)“Enterprise service offering” means an offering to larger organizations through customized or individually negotiated arrangements or special access services.

(i)

(d) “Internet service provider” means a business that provides broadband Internet access service to an individual, corporation, government, or other customer in California.

(j)“ISP traffic exchange” means the exchange of Internet traffic destined for, or originating from, an Internet service provider’s end users between the Internet service provider’s network and another individual or entity, including, but not limited to, an edge provider, content delivery network, or other network operator.

(k)“Mass market” means a service marketed and sold on a standardized basis to residential customers, small businesses, and other end-user customers, including, but not limited to, schools, institutions of higher learning, and libraries. “Mass market” also includes broadband Internet access services purchased with support of the E-rate and Rural Health Care programs and similar programs at the federal and state level, regardless of whether they are customized or individually negotiated, as well as any broadband Internet access service offered using networks supported by the Connect America Fund or similar programs at the federal and state level. “Mass market” does not include enterprise service offerings.

(l)“Network management practice” means a practice that has a primarily technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices.

(m)“Reasonable network management practice” means a network management practice that is primarily used for, and tailored to, achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband Internet access service, and that is as application-agnostic as possible.

(n)“Third-party paid

(e) “Paid prioritization” means the management of an Internet service provider’s network to directly or indirectly favor some traffic over other traffic, including through the use of techniques such as traffic shaping, prioritization, resource reservation, or other forms of preferential traffic management, either (1) in exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, from a third party, or (2) to benefit an affiliated entity.

(o)“Zero-rating” means exempting some Internet traffic from a customer’s data limitation.

(f) “Reasonable network management” means a network management practice that primarily has a technical network management justification, but does not include other business practices. A network management practice is reasonable if it is primarily used for, and tailored to, achieving a legitimate network management purpose, taking into account the particular network architecture and technology of the broadband Internet access service.

1776.
 (a) It shall be unlawful for an Internet service provider, insofar as the provider is engaged in providing broadband Internet access service, to engage in any of the following activities:

(a)

(1) Blocking lawful content, applications, services, or nonharmful devices, subject to reasonable network management practices.

(b)Speeding up, slowing down, altering, restricting, interfering with, or otherwise directly or indirectly favoring, disadvantaging, or discriminating between lawful Internet traffic on the basis of source, destination, Internet content, application, or service, or use of a nonharmful device, or of class of Internet content, application, service, or nonharmful device, subject to reasonable network management practices.

(c)Requiring consideration from edge providers, monetary or otherwise, in exchange for access to the Internet service provider’s end users, including, but not limited to, requiring consideration for either of the following:

(1)Transmitting Internet traffic to and from the Internet service provider’s end users.

(2)Refraining from the activities prohibited in subdivisions (a) and (b).

(2) Impairing or degrading lawful Internet traffic on the basis of Internet content, application, or service, or use of a nonharmful device, subject to reasonable network management practices.

(d)

(3) Engaging in third-party paid prioritization.

(e)Engaging in application-specific differential pricing or zero-rating in exchange for consideration, monetary or otherwise, by third parties.

(f)Zero-rating some Internet content, applications, services, or devices in a category of Internet content, applications, services, or devices, but not the entire category.

(g)Engaging in application-specific differential pricing.

(h)

(4) Unreasonably interfering with, or unreasonably disadvantaging, either an end user’s ability to select, access, and use broadband Internet access service or the lawful Internet content, applications, services, or devices of the end user’s choice, or an edge provider’s ability to make lawful content, applications, services, or devices available to an end user, subject to reasonable network management practices. end users. Reasonable network management shall not be a violation of this paragraph.

(i)Engaging in practices with respect to, related to, or in connection with, ISP traffic exchange that have the purpose or effect of circumventing or undermining the effectiveness of this section.

(j)Engaging in deceptive or misleading marketing practices that misrepresent the treatment of Internet traffic, content, applications, services, or devices by the Internet service provider, or that misrepresent the performance characteristics or commercial terms of the broadband Internet access service to its customers.

(k)Advertising, offering for sale, or selling broadband Internet access service without prominently disclosing with specificity all aspects of the service advertised, offered for sale, or sold.

(l)

(5) Failing to publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access services sufficient for consumers to make informed choices regarding use of those services and for content, application, service, and device providers to develop, market, and maintain Internet offerings.
(b) (1) Nothing in this section supersedes any obligation or authorization a provider of broadband Internet Access service may have to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law, or limits the provider’s ability to do so.
(2) Nothing in this section prohibits reasonable efforts by an Internet service provider of broadband Internet access service to address copyright infringement or other unlawful activity.

1776.5.

It shall be unlawful for an Internet service provider to offer or provide services other than broadband Internet access service that are delivered over the same last-mile connection as the broadband Internet access service, if those services satisfy any of the following conditions:

(a)They are marketed, provide, or can be used as a functional equivalent of broadband Internet access service.

(b)They have the purpose or effect of circumventing or undermining the effectiveness of Section 1776.

(c)They negatively affect the performance of broadband Internet access service.

1777.

(a)(1)An Internet service provider may offer different levels of quality of service to end users as part of its broadband Internet access service, without violating Section 1776, only if all of the following conditions exist:

(A)The different levels of quality of service are equally available to all Internet content, applications, services, and devices, and all classes of Internet content, applications, services, and devices, and the Internet service provider does not discriminate in the provision of the different levels of quality of service on the basis of Internet content, application, service, or device, or class of Internet content, application, service, or device.

(B)The Internet service provider’s end users are able to choose whether, when, and for which Internet content, applications, services, or devices, or classes of Internet content, applications, services, or devices, to use each type of technical treatment.

(C)The Internet service provider charges only its own broadband Internet access service customers for the use of the different level of quality of service.

(D)The provision of the different levels of quality of service does not degrade the quality of the basic default service that Internet traffic receives if the customer does not choose another level of quality of service.

(b)An Internet service provider may zero-rate Internet traffic in application-agnostic ways, without violating Section 1776 or 1776.5, provided that no consideration, monetary or otherwise, is provided by any third party in exchange for the provider’s decision to zero-rate or to not zero-rate traffic.

1778.

Nothing in this chapter supersedes or limits any obligation or authorization an Internet service provider may have, or limits the ability of an Internet service provider, to address the needs of emergency communications or law enforcement, public safety, or national security authorities, consistent with or as permitted by applicable law.

1779.

Violations of Section 1776, 1776.5, or 1777 shall be subject to the remedies and procedures established pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1780).

1777.
 A violation of this chapter shall be subject to the remedies and procedures established pursuant to Chapter 4 (commencing with Section 1780).

SEC. 3.

 Article 2 (commencing with Section 3020) is added to Chapter 3 of Part 1 of Division 2 of the Public Contract Code, to read:
Article  2. Internet Neutrality

3020.
 (a)For purposes of this article, “broadband Internet access service,” service” and “Internet service provider,” “network management practice,” and “reasonable network management practice” provider” have the same meanings as defined in Section 1775 of the Civil Code.

(b)For purposes of this article, “public entity” has the meaning as defined in Section 1100.

3021.

(a)A public entity shall not purchase any fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services from an Internet service provider that is in violation of Section 1776, 1776.5, or 1777 of the Civil Code.

(b)A public entity shall not provide funding for the purchase of any fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services from an Internet service provider that is in violation of Section 1776, 1776.5, or 1777 of the Civil Code.

3022.

(a)Every contract between a public entity and an Internet service provider for broadband Internet access service shall require that the service be rendered consistent with the requirements of Sections 1776, 1776.5, and 1777 of the Civil Code.

(b)If, after execution of a contract for broadband Internet access service, a governmental entity determines that the Internet service provider has violated Section 1776, 1776.5, or 1777 of the Civil Code in providing service to the public entity, the public entity may declare the contract void from the time it was entered into and require repayment of any payments made to the Internet service provider pursuant to the contract. The remedies available pursuant to this section are in addition to any remedy available pursuant to Chapter 5 (commencing with Section 17200) of Part 2 of Division 7 of the Business and Professions Code.

3023.

It shall not be a violation of this article for a public entity to purchase or fund fixed or mobile broadband Internet access services in a geographical area where Internet access services are only available from a single broadband Internet access service provider.

3024.

An Internet service provider that provides fixed or mobile broadband Internet access service purchased or funded by a public entity shall publicly disclose accurate information regarding the network management practices, performance, and commercial terms of its broadband Internet access service that is sufficient to enable end users of those purchased or funded services, including a public entity, to fully and accurately ascertain if the service is conducted in a lawful manner pursuant to Sections 1776, 1776.5, and 1777 of the Civil Code.

3021.
 No state agency may contract with an Internet service provider for the provision of broadband Internet access service unless that provider certifies, under penalty of perjury, that it is in full compliance with Section 1776 of the Civil Code.

SEC. 4.

 The provisions of this act are severable. If any provision of this act or its application is held invalid, that invalidity shall not affect other provisions or applications that can be given effect without the invalid provision or application.

SEC. 5.

 No reimbursement is required by this act pursuant to Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution because the only costs that may be incurred by a local agency or school district will be incurred because this act creates a new crime or infraction, eliminates a crime or infraction, or changes the penalty for a crime or infraction, within the meaning of Section 17556 of the Government Code, or changes the definition of a crime within the meaning of Section 6 of Article XIII B of the California Constitution.