SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) Under current law, the courts are compelled to liberally construe the workers’ compensation statutes with the purpose of extending related benefits for the protection of workers injured in the course of their employment, so long as the intent of the Legislature, as expressed in a particular statute, is not supplanted.
(b) With the enactment of Assembly Bill 338 of the 2007–08 Regular Session (AB 338), the Legislature expressly intended to ameliorate what was then the unintended consequence of unfairly penalizing an injured
employee who returned to work that resulted from the two-year limit that was placed on aggregate disability payments for certain single injuries causing temporary disability.
(c) As introduced, the clearly stated purpose of AB 338 was to alleviate the penalty to injured workers pursuant to Section 4656 of the Labor Code by increasing the maximum number of weeks of temporary disability payments for which an injured worker may be eligible, while also extending the time period of eligibility.
(d) In enacting AB 338, the Legislature adopted a consensus solution that more closely upholds the purpose of the workers’ compensation system, which, by design, encourages and supports injured workers in their efforts to return to work.
(e) Article 6 (commencing with Section 4800) and Article 7 (commencing with Section 4850) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 4 of the Labor Code, both of which govern industrially injured firefighters and other local public safety officers, provide for a leave of absence for up to one year without a loss of salary in lieu of temporary disability payments or maintenance allowance payments while the public safety officer or firefighter is recovering from a disability arising out of and in the course of his or her duties.
(f) The Legislature, in enacting AB 338, did not intend to limit or reduce the amount of payments made to a public safety officer or firefighter during his or her period of temporary disability.
(g) In January 2013, California’s Court of Appeal, First District, Division
4, issued a ruling in County of Alameda v. Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board (Knittel) (2013) 213 Cal.App.4th 278, which linked the limitations on temporary disability indemnity payments established by Section 4656 of the Labor Code and the payments provided under Article 6 (commencing with Section 4800) and Article 7 (commencing with Section 4850) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 4 of the Labor Code.
(h) Knittel starkly contradicts a longstanding, prevailing authority on this issue, including several Workers’ Compensation Appeals Board decisions, that determined that the leave of absence afforded under Article 6 (commencing with Section 4800) and Article 7 (commencing with Section 4850) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 4 of the Labor Code is not a temporary disability indemnity benefit, and, therefore does not count against an industrially
injured public safety officer’s allowable number of compensable weeks of temporary disability indemnity payments.
(i) In rendering Knittel, the court attributed this new interpretation aggregating both the temporary disability indemnity payments and the salary in lieu payments to public safety officers
(Article 6 (commencing with Section 4800) and Article 7 (commencing with Section 4850) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 4 of the Labor Code) to the subtleties of the language changes found in AB 338.
(j) This interpretation has also disenfranchised and potentially created a disability bias against the small number of public safety officers and firefighters who suffer severe industrial injuries as a matter of course and rely upon the in lieu of salary payments in addition to the temporary disability indemnity afforded to all workers under the California system.
(k) It is imperative that the Legislature abrogate the holding in Knittel and restore the Legislature’s intent to limit aggregate temporary disability indemnity payments under Section 4656 of the Labor Code
for a single injury causing temporary disability without disturbing the in-lieu payments afforded under Article 6
(commencing with Section 4800) and Article 7 (commencing with Section 4850) of Chapter 2 of Part 2 of Division 4 of the Labor Code.