SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) California’s civic, economic, and cultural future requires educational options that prepare every pupil and student for a worthwhile role in our vibrant state.
(b) For years, opponents have tried to undermine efforts to help struggling California pupils and students by stating that adjusting public funds to give pupils and students the best educational chance was wrong. Instead of lifting families out of poverty and inspiring the next generation of entrepreneurs, scientists, and leaders, we have trapped children into a one-size-fits-all system that encourages failure rather than success. Parents watch their children struggle, and our “democratically governed public schools” have stopped investing in our children’s futures and are leaving the most marginalized pupils and students behind.
(c) Educators are forced to “teach to the test,” instead of identifying and cultivating their pupils’ and students’ potential. And yet California has been ranked significantly lower than the national average at least since 2000 and the latest reports show this state once again is not meeting the minimal education standards.
(d) Throughout the years, research has consistently shown that private school students tend to perform better on standardized tests. For example, grade 8 private school students averaged about 20 points higher than public school pupils on the reading assessment in 2022, and grade 4 students had nearly the same advantage in average scores. The most recent National Assessment of Educational Progress data shows that private school students score better in almost all subjects as well.
(e) Pupils, students, parents, and educators increasingly want a learning environment where each pupil and student is uniquely known and valued, with customized learning experiences focused on children’s interests and aptitudes, and trust and respect for the parents’ role in developing and educating their children.
(f) For special education in California, school districts must work with private schools and parents to create the most inclusive and thoughtful services for pupils in special education programs. School districts must spend a proportionate share of federal dollars for these programs, but there are no laws prohibiting school districts from spending additional state funds to help these pupils and parents.
(g) Even though private schools are not obligated to create an individualized education program (IEP), once a student with a disability is enrolled in a religious or other private school, the school district must conduct meetings to develop, review, and revise services that will benefit the child and the plan must go through the same process and procedures required in the development of an IEP.
(h) Yet financial barriers have many parents feeling that they have no options but to send their children to neighborhood schools. Private schools, charter schools, and home schools are achieving better educational results, but these options are unaffordable or unavailable for most pupils and students. ZIP Codes and lotteries determine the educational options available for most low- and middle-income pupils and students.
(i) Before the COVID-19 pandemic, approximately 10 percent of pupils and students in California were using alternative education options, but the pandemic required families to try alternatives. In 2023, a survey of 3,820 parents of schoolage children showed that more than one-half of them either considered or are considering a new school. In that study, a majority of Hispanic, Latino, and Black parents, approximately 65 percent, said they were looking into or thinking about a new learning environment for their kids.
(j) California now spends approximately $24,000 per year for each child in public school, including approximately $18,000 from state funds. Spending more on the current and outdated system has not created better results, and many low- to middle-class taxpaying families are not given a choice but to send their pupils to a school in this system. Allowing parents to decide the school that offers the best options and learning experiences for their pupil or student is a better use of education funds. The increasing demand for alternatives will create a range of exciting educational opportunities that all pupils and students can enjoy.
(k) California is the fifth largest economy in the world and needs to offer a world-class, individualized, and customized education to every K–12 pupil or student in our state in order to continue providing for a sustainable and vibrant economy. As such, the state needs to innovate its education system to encourage our children to discover their unique talents, turn those talents into skills, and use those skills to create value for themselves and for others.
(l) Therefore, the people hereby enact the School Choice Flex Account Act of 2025. The act includes the following provisions:
(1) During the 2027–28 school year, $8,000 will be available to each pupil and each student, and $16,000 will be available to each pupil and each student with exceptional needs, to be used toward tuition and education expenses at an accredited private school of their choice. The annual amount shall be adjusted each year. A School Choice Flex Account or Special Education Flex Account will be established at the request of the pupil’s or student’s parent or legal guardian.
(2) The School Choice Flex Account and Special Education Flex Account will be available to the lowest income families for the first two years after the act becomes operative, low- and middle- income families for the two following years, and all families beginning four years after the act is operative.
(3) All of this will be achieved at no additional cost to taxpayers.