156.9.
(a) The department, in conjunction with the State Water Resources Control Board, shall develop a programmatic environmental review process to prevent 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone from entering salmon and steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state. To the extent practicable, the State Water Resources Control Board and the department shall seek the assistance and expertise of the States of Washington and Oregon in the development of the programmatic environmental review process. Through consultation, the State Water Resources Control Board shall determine all of the following for the department’s programmatic environmental review process:(1) The frequency and timing for sampling a qualified storm event, as defined by the State Water Resources Control Board.
(2) The monitoring and reporting protocols.
(3) The specific project location for each county.
(4) All other information and data deemed necessary to inform future stormwater permit reissuances.
(b) The department’s 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone programmatic environmental review process shall include all of the following:
(1) Five pilot projects, as described in subdivision (c), to study the water quality control effectiveness and cost effectiveness of installing and maintaining bioretention and biofiltration along department rights-of-way to eliminate the discharge of 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone into surface waters of the state.
(2) A map of all locations where the department is likely to discharge stormwater into salmon or steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state. The map shall include an overlay of salmon and steelhead fishery information, areas of high vehicle miles traveled, and specific drainage outlets or other likely discharge points for each location.
(3) (A) A strategy to eliminate, by December 31, 2037, the discharge of 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone by the department into salmon and steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state. The strategy shall be posted on the department’s internet website on or before December 31, 2027, and shall include, but not be limited to, consideration of cost savings through the implementation of existing total daily maximum load projects and planned projects where biofiltration or bioretention could effectively be implemented to control 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone.
(B) In developing the strategy required by subparagraph (A), the department may consult with the Department of Toxic Substances Control and consider how the department’s strategy, in combination with efforts by the Department of Toxic Substances Control to regulate the use of 6PPD in the manufacture of motor vehicle tires, will further reduce the presence of 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone in salmon and steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state.
(c) No later than December 31, 2026, the department shall construct five pilot projects, one each in the Counties of San Mateo, Contra Costa, Sonoma, Humboldt, and Nevada, to study the highest performance and most cost-effective methods to install bioretention and biofiltration comparatively as a method to eliminate 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone from entering salmon and steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state. The study shall also measure the effectiveness of bioretention and biofiltration to control the discharge of microplastics, including tire wear particles, and other pollutants as deemed appropriate by the State Water Resources Control Board, from state highways into surface waters of the state.
(d) The department shall provide consultation on a government-to-government basis with tribal communities, as appropriate, in order to allow tribal officials the opportunity to provide meaningful and timely input in the development of the department’s strategy to eliminate 6PPD and 6PPD-quinone from all salmon and steelhead trout bearing surface waters of the state.
(e) All information provided by the department to the State Water Resources Control Board pursuant to this section shall be made publicly available through the State Water Resources Control Board’s stormwater data collection system.