SECTION 1.
The Legislature finds and declares all of the following:(a) California has experienced dozens of disastrous earthquakes, which have caused loss of life, injury, and economic loss. One of the most significant earthquakes in California’s history is the 1994 Northridge earthquake, which, at a magnitude of 6.7, claimed the lives of 60 people and caused direct economic losses of $42,000,000,000.
(b) The third Uniform California Earthquake Rupture Forecast (UCERF3), released in 2015, predicted a 60 percent likelihood of a magnitude 6.7 or larger earthquake in the Los Angeles area in the next 30 years and a 72 percent likelihood for the San Francisco Bay area.
(c) According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST), each year hazard events lead to failures in buildings and infrastructure, as well as deaths and injuries, short- and long-term displacement of the affected population, adverse health effects, and disruption to the social order related to the impaired functioning of schools, government, and businesses.
(d) The primary, long-standing goal of building codes is to establish the minimum requirements to safeguard the public health, safety, and general welfare. However, a recent study by the Federal Emergency Management Agency (FEMA) suggests that 20 to 40 percent of modern code-conforming buildings in an affected region would be unfit for occupancy following a large earthquake, taking months or years to repair, and 15 to 20 percent would be economically unrepairable, taking many years to replace.
(e) California and its communities would benefit if owners and residents could expect and rely on buildings to maintain their structural integrity and continue to function after a seismic event. Buildings that are able to do so would make it possible to avoid lengthy and costly repairs or rebuilding and related disruptions. Consistent with the stated intent of building codes to safeguard health, safety, and welfare, California should update its building codes to not just provide adequate safety but also provide for timely recovery.
(f) The United States Congress enacted a reauthorization and amendment to the National Earthquake Hazards Reduction Program (NEHRP) on December 11, 2018. According to the Congressional Research Service, the language of the NEHRP reauthorization and amendment “highlights one of the changes in overall NEHRP program direction to enhance the aspect of earthquake resilience, meaning building structures that would allow for continued use and reoccupancy following an earthquake.”
(g) In 2019, as mandated by the NEHRP reauthorization, the Director of NIST and the Administrator of FEMA jointly convened a committee of experts from federal agencies, nongovernmental organizations, private sector entities, disaster management professional associations, engineering professional associations, and professional construction and homebuilding industry associations to assess and recommend options for improving the built environment and critical infrastructure to reflect performance goals stated in terms of post-earthquake reoccupancy and functional recovery time.
(h) In 2020, as mandated by the NEHRP reauthorization, the committee completed its report: NIST-FEMA Special Publication FEMA P-2090 / NIST SP-1254 “Recommended Options for Improving the Built Environment for Post-Earthquake Reoccupancy and Functional Recovery Time” which was submitted to Congress in January 2021. The report contains recommendations for state and local jurisdictions to improve the earthquake preparedness and recovery time of their communities, including modifications to building codes to incorporate functional recovery standards. Additional publications are available to support the development of such standards.