Today's Law As Amended


PDF |Add To My Favorites | print page

SB-131 Damages: childhood sexual abuse: statute of limitations.(2013-2014)



As Amends the Law Today


SECTION 1.

 Section 340.1 of the Code of Civil Procedure is amended to read:

340.1.
 (a) In an action for recovery of damages suffered as a result of childhood sexual assault, abuse,  the time for commencement of the action shall be within 22 eight  years of the date the plaintiff attains the age of majority or within five three  years of the date the plaintiff discovers or reasonably should have discovered that psychological injury or illness occurring after the age of majority was caused by the sexual assault, abuse,  whichever period expires later, for any of the following actions:
(1) An action against any person for committing an act of childhood sexual assault. abuse. 
(2) An action for liability against any person or entity who owed a duty of care to the plaintiff, if where  a wrongful or negligent act by that person or entity was a legal cause of the childhood sexual assault abuse  that resulted in the injury to the plaintiff.
(3) An action for liability against any person or entity if where  an intentional act by that person or entity was a legal cause of the childhood sexual assault abuse  that resulted in the injury to the plaintiff.
(b) (1) In an  No  action described in subdivision (a), a person who is sexually assaulted and proves it was as the result of a cover up may recover up to treble damages against a defendant who is found to have covered up the sexual assault of a minor, unless prohibited by another law. paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) may be commenced on or after the plaintiff’s 26th birthday. 
(2) For purposes of this subdivision, a “cover up” is a concerted effort to hide evidence relating to childhood sexual assault.
(c) (2)  An action described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) shall not be commenced on or after the plaintiff’s 40th birthday unless the  This subdivision does not apply if the  person or entity knew or had reason to know, or was otherwise on notice, of any misconduct that creates a risk of childhood sexual assault unlawful sexual conduct  by an employee, volunteer, representative, or agent, or the person or entity  and  failed to take reasonable steps or steps, and  to implement reasonable safeguards safeguards,  to avoid acts of childhood sexual assault.  unlawful sexual conduct in the future by that person, including, but not limited to, preventing or avoiding placement of that person in a function or environment in which contact with children is an inherent part of that function or environment.  For purposes of this subdivision, providing or requiring counseling is not sufficient, in and of itself, to constitute a reasonable step or reasonable safeguard. Nothing in this subdivision shall be construed to constitute a substantive change in negligence law. 
(3) Notwithstanding any other provision of law, a party shall be entitled to conduct discovery before the court may rule on a motion challenging the sufficiency of the plaintiff’s showing under paragraph (2).
(c) The time limits for commencement of actions described in subdivisions (a) and (b) shall be applied retroactively to any claim that has not been adjudicated to finality on the merits as of January 1, 2014. Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any cause of action for damages described in paragraph (2) or (3) of subdivision (a) that would otherwise be barred solely by the statute of limitations as of January 1, 2014, is revived, and, in that case, a cause of action may be commenced within one year of January 1, 2014, provided that the plaintiff’s 26th birthday was before January 1, 2003, and the plaintiff discovered the cause of his or her injuries on or after January 1, 2004. Paragraph (3) of subdivision (b) shall not apply to a cause of action revived pursuant to this subdivision.
(d) Subdivision (c) does not apply to either of the following:
(1) Any claim that has been litigated to finality on the merits in any court of competent jurisdiction prior to January 1, 2014. Termination of a prior action on the basis of the statute of limitations does not constitute a claim that has been litigated to finality on the merits.
(2) Any written, compromised settlement agreement that has been entered into between a plaintiff and a defendant where the plaintiff was represented by an attorney who was admitted to practice law in this state at the time of the settlement, and the plaintiff signed the agreement.
(d) (e)  “Childhood sexual assault” abuse”  as used in this section includes any act committed against the plaintiff that occurred when the plaintiff was under the age of  18 years of age  and that would have been proscribed by Section 266j of the Penal Code; Section 285 of the Penal Code; paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (b), or of subdivision (c), of Section 286 of the Penal Code; subdivision (a) or (b) of Section 288 of the Penal Code; paragraph (1) or (2) of subdivision (b), or of subdivision (c), of Section 287 or of former Section  288a of the Penal Code; subdivision (h), (i), or (j) of Section 289 of the Penal Code; any sexual conduct as defined in paragraph (1) of subdivision (d) of Section 311.4 of the Penal Code; Section  Section  647.6 of the Penal Code; or any prior laws of this state of similar effect at the time the act was committed. This subdivision does not limit Nothing in this subdivision limits  the availability of causes of action permitted under subdivision (a), including causes of action against persons or entities other than the alleged perpetrator of the abuse.
(e) (f)  This  Nothing in this  section shall not  be construed to alter the otherwise applicable burden of proof, as defined in Section 115 of the Evidence Code, that a plaintiff has in a civil action subject to this section.
(f) (g)  Every plaintiff 40 26  years of age or older at the time the action is filed shall file certificates of merit as specified in subdivision (g). (h). 
(g) (h)  Certificates of merit shall be executed by the attorney for the plaintiff and by a licensed mental health practitioner selected by the plaintiff declaring, respectively, as follows, setting forth the facts which that  support the declaration:
(1) That the attorney has reviewed the facts of the case, that the attorney has  consulted with at least one mental health practitioner who is licensed to practice and practices in this state and who  the attorney reasonably believes is knowledgeable of the relevant facts and issues involved in the particular action, and that the attorney has  concluded on the basis of that review and consultation that there is reasonable and meritorious cause for the filing of the action. The person consulted may not be a party to the litigation. 
(2) That the mental health practitioner consulted is licensed to practice and practices in this state and is not a party to the action, that the practitioner is not treating and has not treated the plaintiff, and that the practitioner has interviewed the plaintiff and is knowledgeable of the relevant facts and issues involved in the particular action, and has concluded, on the basis of the practitioner’s  his or her  knowledge of the facts and issues, that in the practitioner’s  his or her  professional opinion there is a reasonable basis to believe that the plaintiff had been subject to childhood sexual abuse.
(3) That the attorney was unable to obtain the consultation required by paragraph (1) because a statute of limitations would impair the action and that the certificates required by paragraphs (1) and (2) could not be obtained before the impairment of the action. If a certificate is executed pursuant to this paragraph, the certificates required by paragraphs (1) and (2) shall be filed within 60 days after filing the complaint.
(h) (i)  If Where  certificates are required pursuant to subdivision (f), (g),  the attorney for the plaintiff shall execute a separate certificate of merit for each defendant named in the complaint.
(i) (j)  In any action subject to subdivision (f), a defendant shall not  (g), no defendant may  be served, and the duty to serve a defendant with process does not attach, until the court has reviewed the certificates of merit filed pursuant to subdivision (g) (h)  with respect to that defendant, and has found, in camera, based solely on those certificates of merit, that there is reasonable and meritorious cause for the filing of the action against that defendant. At that time, the duty to serve that defendant with process shall attach.
(j) (k)  A violation of this section may constitute unprofessional conduct and may be the grounds for discipline against the attorney.
(k) ( l)  The failure to file certificates in accordance with this section shall be grounds for a demurrer pursuant to Section 430.10 or a motion to strike pursuant to Section 435.
( (m) 
l
)  In any action subject to subdivision (f), a (g), no  defendant shall may  be named except  by “Doe” designation in any pleadings or papers filed in the action until there has been a showing of corroborative fact as to the charging allegations against that defendant.
(m) (n)  At any time after the action is filed, the plaintiff may apply to the court for permission to amend the complaint to substitute the name of the defendant or defendants for the fictitious designation, as follows:
(1) The application shall be accompanied by a certificate of corroborative fact executed by the attorney for the plaintiff. The certificate shall declare that the attorney has discovered one or more facts corroborative of one or more of the charging allegations against a defendant or defendants, and shall set forth in clear and concise terms the nature and substance of the corroborative fact. If the corroborative fact is evidenced by the statement of a witness or the contents of a document, the certificate shall declare that the attorney has personal knowledge of the statement of the witness or of the contents of the document, and the identity and location of the witness or document shall be included in the certificate. For purposes of this section, a fact is corroborative of an allegation if it confirms or supports the allegation. The opinion of any mental health practitioner concerning the plaintiff shall not constitute a corroborative fact for purposes of this section.
(2) If Where  the application to name a defendant is made before  prior to  that defendant’s appearance in the action, neither the application nor the certificate of corroborative fact by the attorney shall be served on the defendant or defendants, nor on any other party or their counsel of record.
(3) If Where  the application to name a defendant is made after that defendant’s appearance in the action, the application shall be served on all parties and proof of service provided to the court, but the certificate of corroborative fact by the attorney shall not be served on any party or their counsel of record.
(n) (o)  The court shall review the application and the certificate of corroborative fact in camera and, based solely on the certificate and any reasonable inferences to be drawn from the certificate, shall, if one or more facts corroborative of one or more of the charging allegations against a defendant has been shown, order that the complaint may be amended to substitute the name of the defendant or defendants.
(o) (p)  The court shall keep under seal and confidential from the public and all parties to the litigation, other than the plaintiff, any and all certificates of corroborative fact filed pursuant to subdivision (m). (n). 
(p) (q)  Upon the favorable conclusion of the litigation with respect to any defendant for whom a certificate of merit was filed or for whom a certificate of merit should have been filed pursuant to this section, the court may, upon the motion of a party or upon the court’s own motion, verify compliance with this section by requiring the attorney for the plaintiff who was required by subdivision (g) (h)  to execute the certificate to reveal the name, address, and telephone number of the person or persons consulted with pursuant to subdivision (g) (h)  that were relied upon by the attorney in preparation of the certificate of merit. The name, address, and telephone number shall be disclosed to the trial judge in camera and in the absence of the moving party. If the court finds there has been a failure to comply with this section, the court may order a party, a party’s attorney, or both, to pay any reasonable expenses, including attorney’s fees, incurred by the defendant for whom a certificate of merit should have been filed.
(q) (r)  Notwithstanding any other provision of law, any claim for damages described in paragraphs (1) through (3), inclusive, of subdivision (a) that has not been litigated to finality and that would otherwise be barred as of January 1, 2020, because the applicable statute of limitations, claim presentation deadline, or any other time limit had expired, is revived, and these claims may be commenced within three years of January 1, 2020. A plaintiff shall have the later of the three-year time period under this subdivision or the time period under subdivision (a) as amended by the act that added this subdivision. The amendments to this section enacted at the 1990 portion of the 1989–90 Regular Session shall apply to any action commenced on or after January 1, 1991, including any action otherwise barred by the period of limitations in effect prior to January 1, 1991, thereby reviving those causes of action which had lapsed or technically expired under the law existing prior to January 1, 1991. 
(s) The Legislature declares that it is the intent of the Legislature, in enacting the amendments to this section enacted at the 1994 portion of the 1993–94 Regular Session, that the express language of revival added to this section by those amendments shall apply to any action commenced on or after January 1, 1991.
(t) Nothing in the amendments to this section enacted at the 1998 portion of the 1997–98 Regular Session is intended to create a new theory of liability.
(r) (u)  The changes made to the time period under subdivision (a) as amended by the act that amended this subdivision in 2019 apply to and revive  amendments to subdivision (a) of this section, enacted at the 1998 portion of the 1997–98 Regular Session, shall apply to  any action commenced on or after the date of enactment of that act,  January 1, 1999,  and to any action filed before the date of enactment, prior to January 1, 1999,  and still pending on that date, including any action or causes of action that which  would have been barred by the laws in effect before the date of enactment. prior to January 1, 1999. Nothing in this subdivision is intended to revive actions or causes of action as to which there has been a final adjudication prior to January 1, 1999.