| Type of Measure |
|---|
| Inactive Bill - Vetoed |
| Majority Vote Required |
| Non-Appropriation |
| Non-Fiscal Committee |
| Non-State-Mandated Local Program |
| Non-Urgency |
| Non-Tax levy |
| Last 5 History Actions | |
|---|---|
| Date | Action |
| 09/28/14 | Vetoed by Governor. |
| 09/10/14 | Enrolled and presented to the Governor at 4 p.m. |
| 08/29/14 | Senate amendments concurred in. To Engrossing and Enrolling. (Ayes 47. Noes 28. Page 6693.). |
| 08/29/14 | Assembly Rule 77 suspended. (Ayes 51. Noes 23. Page 6692.) |
| 08/28/14 | In Assembly. Concurrence in Senate amendments pending. May be considered on or after August 30 pursuant to Assembly Rule 77. |
| Governor's Veto Message |
|---|
| To the Members of the California State Assembly: I am returning Assembly Bill 885 without my signature. AB 885 would allow a court to instruct the jury to consider intentional or knowing prosecutorial discovery violations in determining whether reasonable doubt exists in a criminal case. Prosecutorial misconduct should never be tolerated. This bill, however, would be a sharp departure from current practice that looks to the judiciary to decide how juries should be instructed. Under current law, judges have an array of remedies at their disposal if a discovery violation comes to light during trial. Sincerely, Edmund G. Brown Jr. |